@article{welbl-etal-2018-constructing,
title = "Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents",
author = "Welbl, Johannes and
Stenetorp, Pontus and
Riedel, Sebastian",
editor = "Lee, Lillian and
Johnson, Mark and
Toutanova, Kristina and
Roark, Brian",
journal = "Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
volume = "6",
year = "2018",
address = "Cambridge, MA",
publisher = "MIT Press",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/Q18-1021",
doi = "10.1162/tacl_a_00021",
pages = "287--302",
abstract = "Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine comprehension methods, but currently no resources exist to train and test this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence {---} effectively performing multihop, alias multi-step, inference. We devise a methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However, both models struggle to select relevant information; and providing documents guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 54.5{\%} on an annotated test set, compared to human performance at 85.0{\%}, leaving ample room for improvement.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="welbl-etal-2018-constructing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Johannes</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Welbl</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pontus</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stenetorp</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sebastian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Riedel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2018</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>MIT Press</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, MA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine comprehension methods, but currently no resources exist to train and test this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence — effectively performing multihop, alias multi-step, inference. We devise a methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However, both models struggle to select relevant information; and providing documents guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 54.5% on an annotated test set, compared to human performance at 85.0%, leaving ample room for improvement.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">welbl-etal-2018-constructing</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1162/tacl_a_00021</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/Q18-1021</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2018</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>6</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>287</start>
<end>302</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents
%A Welbl, Johannes
%A Stenetorp, Pontus
%A Riedel, Sebastian
%J Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
%D 2018
%V 6
%I MIT Press
%C Cambridge, MA
%F welbl-etal-2018-constructing
%X Most Reading Comprehension methods limit themselves to queries which can be answered using a single sentence, paragraph, or document. Enabling models to combine disjoint pieces of textual evidence would extend the scope of machine comprehension methods, but currently no resources exist to train and test this capability. We propose a novel task to encourage the development of models for text understanding across multiple documents and to investigate the limits of existing methods. In our task, a model learns to seek and combine evidence — effectively performing multihop, alias multi-step, inference. We devise a methodology to produce datasets for this task, given a collection of query-answer pairs and thematically linked documents. Two datasets from different domains are induced, and we identify potential pitfalls and devise circumvention strategies. We evaluate two previously proposed competitive models and find that one can integrate information across documents. However, both models struggle to select relevant information; and providing documents guaranteed to be relevant greatly improves their performance. While the models outperform several strong baselines, their best accuracy reaches 54.5% on an annotated test set, compared to human performance at 85.0%, leaving ample room for improvement.
%R 10.1162/tacl_a_00021
%U https://aclanthology.org/Q18-1021
%U https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00021
%P 287-302
Markdown (Informal)
[Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents](https://aclanthology.org/Q18-1021) (Welbl et al., TACL 2018)
ACL