<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="boguslavsky-2016-non">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>On the Non-canonical Valency Filling</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Igor</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Boguslavsky</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2016-12</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Grammar and Lexicon: interactions and interfaces (GramLex)</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Eva</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Hajičová</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Igor</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Boguslavsky</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Osaka, Japan</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Valency slot filling is a semantic glue, which brings together the meanings of words. As regards the position of an argument in the dependency structure with respect to its predicate, there exist three types of valency filling: active (canonical), passive, and discontinuous. Of these, the first type is studied much better than the other two. As a rule, canonical actants are unambiguously marked in the syntactic structure, and each actant corresponds to a unique syntactic position. Linguistic information on which syntactic function an actant might have (subject, direct or indirect object), what its morphological form should be and which prepositions or conjunctions it requires, can be given in the lexicon in the form of government patterns, subcategorization frames, or similar data structures. We concentrate on non-canonical cases of valency filling in Russian, which are characteristic of non-verbal parts of speech, such as adverbs, adjectives, and particles, in the first place. They are more difficult to handle than canonical ones, because the position of the actant in the tree is governed by more complicated rules. A valency may be filled by expressions occupying different syntactic positions, and a syntactic position may accept expressions filling different valencies of the same word. We show how these phenomena can be processed in a semantic analyzer.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">boguslavsky-2016-non</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/W16-3808</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2016-12</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>51</start>
            <end>60</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T On the Non-canonical Valency Filling
%A Boguslavsky, Igor
%Y Hajičová, Eva
%Y Boguslavsky, Igor
%S Proceedings of the Workshop on Grammar and Lexicon: interactions and interfaces (GramLex)
%D 2016
%8 December
%I The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee
%C Osaka, Japan
%F boguslavsky-2016-non
%X Valency slot filling is a semantic glue, which brings together the meanings of words. As regards the position of an argument in the dependency structure with respect to its predicate, there exist three types of valency filling: active (canonical), passive, and discontinuous. Of these, the first type is studied much better than the other two. As a rule, canonical actants are unambiguously marked in the syntactic structure, and each actant corresponds to a unique syntactic position. Linguistic information on which syntactic function an actant might have (subject, direct or indirect object), what its morphological form should be and which prepositions or conjunctions it requires, can be given in the lexicon in the form of government patterns, subcategorization frames, or similar data structures. We concentrate on non-canonical cases of valency filling in Russian, which are characteristic of non-verbal parts of speech, such as adverbs, adjectives, and particles, in the first place. They are more difficult to handle than canonical ones, because the position of the actant in the tree is governed by more complicated rules. A valency may be filled by expressions occupying different syntactic positions, and a syntactic position may accept expressions filling different valencies of the same word. We show how these phenomena can be processed in a semantic analyzer.
%U https://aclanthology.org/W16-3808
%P 51-60

Markdown (Informal)

[On the Non-canonical Valency Filling](https://aclanthology.org/W16-3808) (Boguslavsky, GramLex 2016)

• On the Non-canonical Valency Filling (Boguslavsky, GramLex 2016)

ACL

• Igor Boguslavsky. 2016. On the Non-canonical Valency Filling. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Grammar and Lexicon: interactions and interfaces (GramLex), pages 51–60, Osaka, Japan. The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee.