@inproceedings{van-schijndel-schuler-2016-addressing,
title = "Addressing surprisal deficiencies in reading time models",
author = "van Schijndel, Marten and
Schuler, William",
editor = "Brunato, Dominique and
Dell{'}Orletta, Felice and
Venturi, Giulia and
Fran{\c{c}}ois, Thomas and
Blache, Philippe",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity ({CL}4{LC})",
month = dec,
year = "2016",
address = "Osaka, Japan",
publisher = "The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W16-4104",
pages = "32--37",
abstract = "This study demonstrates a weakness in how n-gram and PCFG surprisal are used to predict reading times in eye-tracking data. In particular, the information conveyed by words skipped during saccades is not usually included in the surprisal measures. This study shows that correcting the surprisal calculation improves n-gram surprisal and that upcoming n-grams affect reading times, replicating previous findings of how lexical frequencies affect reading times. In contrast, the predictivity of PCFG surprisal does not benefit from the surprisal correction despite the fact that lexical sequences skipped by saccades are processed by readers, as demonstrated by the corrected n-gram measure. These results raise questions about the formulation of information-theoretic measures of syntactic processing such as PCFG surprisal and entropy reduction when applied to reading times.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="van-schijndel-schuler-2016-addressing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Addressing surprisal deficiencies in reading time models</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Marten</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van Schijndel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">William</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Schuler</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2016-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity (CL4LC)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dominique</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Brunato</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Felice</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dell’Orletta</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Giulia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Venturi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Thomas</namePart>
<namePart type="family">François</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Philippe</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Blache</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Osaka, Japan</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This study demonstrates a weakness in how n-gram and PCFG surprisal are used to predict reading times in eye-tracking data. In particular, the information conveyed by words skipped during saccades is not usually included in the surprisal measures. This study shows that correcting the surprisal calculation improves n-gram surprisal and that upcoming n-grams affect reading times, replicating previous findings of how lexical frequencies affect reading times. In contrast, the predictivity of PCFG surprisal does not benefit from the surprisal correction despite the fact that lexical sequences skipped by saccades are processed by readers, as demonstrated by the corrected n-gram measure. These results raise questions about the formulation of information-theoretic measures of syntactic processing such as PCFG surprisal and entropy reduction when applied to reading times.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">van-schijndel-schuler-2016-addressing</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W16-4104</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2016-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>32</start>
<end>37</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Addressing surprisal deficiencies in reading time models
%A van Schijndel, Marten
%A Schuler, William
%Y Brunato, Dominique
%Y Dell’Orletta, Felice
%Y Venturi, Giulia
%Y François, Thomas
%Y Blache, Philippe
%S Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity (CL4LC)
%D 2016
%8 December
%I The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee
%C Osaka, Japan
%F van-schijndel-schuler-2016-addressing
%X This study demonstrates a weakness in how n-gram and PCFG surprisal are used to predict reading times in eye-tracking data. In particular, the information conveyed by words skipped during saccades is not usually included in the surprisal measures. This study shows that correcting the surprisal calculation improves n-gram surprisal and that upcoming n-grams affect reading times, replicating previous findings of how lexical frequencies affect reading times. In contrast, the predictivity of PCFG surprisal does not benefit from the surprisal correction despite the fact that lexical sequences skipped by saccades are processed by readers, as demonstrated by the corrected n-gram measure. These results raise questions about the formulation of information-theoretic measures of syntactic processing such as PCFG surprisal and entropy reduction when applied to reading times.
%U https://aclanthology.org/W16-4104
%P 32-37
Markdown (Informal)
[Addressing surprisal deficiencies in reading time models](https://aclanthology.org/W16-4104) (van Schijndel & Schuler, CL4LC 2016)
ACL