@inproceedings{buechel-hahn-2017-readers,
title = "Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text Understanding in Emotion Annotation",
author = "Buechel, Sven and
Hahn, Udo",
editor = "Schneider, Nathan and
Xue, Nianwen",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 11th Linguistic Annotation Workshop",
month = apr,
year = "2017",
address = "Valencia, Spain",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W17-0801",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W17-0801",
pages = "1--12",
abstract = "We here examine how different perspectives of understanding written discourse, like the reader{'}s, the writer{'}s or the text{'}s point of view, affect the quality of emotion annotations. We conducted a series of annotation experiments on two corpora, a popular movie review corpus and a genre- and domain-balanced corpus of standard English. We found statistical evidence that the writer{'}s perspective yields superior annotation quality overall. However, the quality one perspective yields compared to the other(s) seems to depend on the domain the utterance originates from. Our data further suggest that the popular movie review data set suffers from an atypical bimodal distribution which may decrease model performance when used as a training resource.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="buechel-hahn-2017-readers">
<titleInfo>
<title>Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text Understanding in Emotion Annotation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sven</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Buechel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Udo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hahn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2017-04</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 11th Linguistic Annotation Workshop</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nathan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Schneider</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nianwen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xue</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Valencia, Spain</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>We here examine how different perspectives of understanding written discourse, like the reader’s, the writer’s or the text’s point of view, affect the quality of emotion annotations. We conducted a series of annotation experiments on two corpora, a popular movie review corpus and a genre- and domain-balanced corpus of standard English. We found statistical evidence that the writer’s perspective yields superior annotation quality overall. However, the quality one perspective yields compared to the other(s) seems to depend on the domain the utterance originates from. Our data further suggest that the popular movie review data set suffers from an atypical bimodal distribution which may decrease model performance when used as a training resource.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">buechel-hahn-2017-readers</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W17-0801</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W17-0801</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2017-04</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1</start>
<end>12</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text Understanding in Emotion Annotation
%A Buechel, Sven
%A Hahn, Udo
%Y Schneider, Nathan
%Y Xue, Nianwen
%S Proceedings of the 11th Linguistic Annotation Workshop
%D 2017
%8 April
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Valencia, Spain
%F buechel-hahn-2017-readers
%X We here examine how different perspectives of understanding written discourse, like the reader’s, the writer’s or the text’s point of view, affect the quality of emotion annotations. We conducted a series of annotation experiments on two corpora, a popular movie review corpus and a genre- and domain-balanced corpus of standard English. We found statistical evidence that the writer’s perspective yields superior annotation quality overall. However, the quality one perspective yields compared to the other(s) seems to depend on the domain the utterance originates from. Our data further suggest that the popular movie review data set suffers from an atypical bimodal distribution which may decrease model performance when used as a training resource.
%R 10.18653/v1/W17-0801
%U https://aclanthology.org/W17-0801
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-0801
%P 1-12
Markdown (Informal)
[Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text Understanding in Emotion Annotation](https://aclanthology.org/W17-0801) (Buechel & Hahn, LAW 2017)
ACL