@inproceedings{van-der-goot-etal-2017-normalize,
title = "To normalize, or not to normalize: The impact of normalization on Part-of-Speech tagging",
author = "van der Goot, Rob and
Plank, Barbara and
Nissim, Malvina",
editor = "Derczynski, Leon and
Xu, Wei and
Ritter, Alan and
Baldwin, Tim",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text",
month = sep,
year = "2017",
address = "Copenhagen, Denmark",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W17-4404",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W17-4404",
pages = "31--39",
abstract = "Does normalization help Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging accuracy on noisy, non-canonical data? To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the actual impact of normalization in a real-world scenario, where gold error detection is not available. We investigate the effect of automatic normalization on POS tagging of tweets. We also compare normalization to strategies that leverage large amounts of unlabeled data kept in its raw form. Our results show that normalization helps, but does not add consistently beyond just word embedding layer initialization. The latter approach yields a tagging model that is competitive with a Twitter state-of-the-art tagger.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="van-der-goot-etal-2017-normalize">
<titleInfo>
<title>To normalize, or not to normalize: The impact of normalization on Part-of-Speech tagging</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rob</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van der Goot</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Barbara</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Plank</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Malvina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Nissim</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2017-09</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Leon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Derczynski</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Wei</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ritter</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tim</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Baldwin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen, Denmark</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Does normalization help Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging accuracy on noisy, non-canonical data? To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the actual impact of normalization in a real-world scenario, where gold error detection is not available. We investigate the effect of automatic normalization on POS tagging of tweets. We also compare normalization to strategies that leverage large amounts of unlabeled data kept in its raw form. Our results show that normalization helps, but does not add consistently beyond just word embedding layer initialization. The latter approach yields a tagging model that is competitive with a Twitter state-of-the-art tagger.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">van-der-goot-etal-2017-normalize</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W17-4404</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W17-4404</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2017-09</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>31</start>
<end>39</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T To normalize, or not to normalize: The impact of normalization on Part-of-Speech tagging
%A van der Goot, Rob
%A Plank, Barbara
%A Nissim, Malvina
%Y Derczynski, Leon
%Y Xu, Wei
%Y Ritter, Alan
%Y Baldwin, Tim
%S Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text
%D 2017
%8 September
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Copenhagen, Denmark
%F van-der-goot-etal-2017-normalize
%X Does normalization help Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging accuracy on noisy, non-canonical data? To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the actual impact of normalization in a real-world scenario, where gold error detection is not available. We investigate the effect of automatic normalization on POS tagging of tweets. We also compare normalization to strategies that leverage large amounts of unlabeled data kept in its raw form. Our results show that normalization helps, but does not add consistently beyond just word embedding layer initialization. The latter approach yields a tagging model that is competitive with a Twitter state-of-the-art tagger.
%R 10.18653/v1/W17-4404
%U https://aclanthology.org/W17-4404
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-4404
%P 31-39
Markdown (Informal)
[To normalize, or not to normalize: The impact of normalization on Part-of-Speech tagging](https://aclanthology.org/W17-4404) (van der Goot et al., WNUT 2017)
ACL