<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="ghaly-mandel-2017-analyzing">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Analyzing Human and Machine Performance In Resolving Ambiguous Spoken Sentences</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Hussein</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Ghaly</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Michael</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Mandel</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2017-09</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech-Centric Natural Language Processing</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Nicholas</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Ruiz</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Srinivas</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Bangalore</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen, Denmark</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Written sentences can be more ambiguous than spoken sentences. We investigate this difference for two different types of ambiguity: prepositional phrase (PP) attachment and sentences where the addition of commas changes the meaning. We recorded a native English speaker saying several of each type of sentence both with and without disambiguating contextual information. These sentences were then presented either as text or audio and either with or without context to subjects who were asked to select the proper interpretation of the sentence. Results suggest that comma-ambiguous sentences are easier to disambiguate than PP-attachment-ambiguous sentences, possibly due to the presence of clear prosodic boundaries, namely silent pauses. Subject performance for sentences with PP-attachment ambiguity without context was 52% for text only while it was 72.4% for audio only, suggesting that audio has more disambiguating information than text. Using an analysis of acoustic features of two PP-attachment sentences, a simple classifier was implemented to resolve the PP-attachment ambiguity being early or late closure with a mean accuracy of 80%.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">ghaly-mandel-2017-analyzing</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W17-4603</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/W17-4603</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2017-09</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>18</start>
            <end>26</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Analyzing Human and Machine Performance In Resolving Ambiguous Spoken Sentences
%A Ghaly, Hussein
%A Mandel, Michael
%Y Ruiz, Nicholas
%Y Bangalore, Srinivas
%S Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech-Centric Natural Language Processing
%D 2017
%8 September
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Copenhagen, Denmark
%F ghaly-mandel-2017-analyzing
%X Written sentences can be more ambiguous than spoken sentences. We investigate this difference for two different types of ambiguity: prepositional phrase (PP) attachment and sentences where the addition of commas changes the meaning. We recorded a native English speaker saying several of each type of sentence both with and without disambiguating contextual information. These sentences were then presented either as text or audio and either with or without context to subjects who were asked to select the proper interpretation of the sentence. Results suggest that comma-ambiguous sentences are easier to disambiguate than PP-attachment-ambiguous sentences, possibly due to the presence of clear prosodic boundaries, namely silent pauses. Subject performance for sentences with PP-attachment ambiguity without context was 52% for text only while it was 72.4% for audio only, suggesting that audio has more disambiguating information than text. Using an analysis of acoustic features of two PP-attachment sentences, a simple classifier was implemented to resolve the PP-attachment ambiguity being early or late closure with a mean accuracy of 80%.
%R 10.18653/v1/W17-4603
%U https://aclanthology.org/W17-4603
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-4603
%P 18-26

Markdown (Informal)

[Analyzing Human and Machine Performance In Resolving Ambiguous Spoken Sentences](https://aclanthology.org/W17-4603) (Ghaly & Mandel, 2017)

• Analyzing Human and Machine Performance In Resolving Ambiguous Spoken Sentences (Ghaly & Mandel, 2017)

ACL

• Hussein Ghaly and Michael Mandel. 2017. Analyzing Human and Machine Performance In Resolving Ambiguous Spoken Sentences. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech-Centric Natural Language Processing, pages 18–26, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for Computational Linguistics.