@inproceedings{green-2017-manual,
title = "Manual Identification of Arguments with Implicit Conclusions Using Semantic Rules for Argument Mining",
author = "Green, Nancy",
editor = "Habernal, Ivan and
Gurevych, Iryna and
Ashley, Kevin and
Cardie, Claire and
Green, Nancy and
Litman, Diane and
Petasis, Georgios and
Reed, Chris and
Slonim, Noam and
Walker, Vern",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining",
month = sep,
year = "2017",
address = "Copenhagen, Denmark",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W17-5109",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W17-5109",
pages = "73--78",
abstract = "This paper describes a pilot study to evaluate human analysts{'} ability to identify the argumentation scheme and premises of an argument having an implicit conclusion. In preparation for the study, argumentation scheme definitions were crafted for genetics research articles. The schemes were defined in semantic terms, following a proposal to use semantic rules to mine arguments in that literature.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="green-2017-manual">
<titleInfo>
<title>Manual Identification of Arguments with Implicit Conclusions Using Semantic Rules for Argument Mining</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nancy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Green</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2017-09</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ivan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Habernal</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Iryna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gurevych</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kevin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ashley</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Claire</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Cardie</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nancy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Green</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Diane</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Litman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Georgios</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Petasis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chris</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Reed</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Noam</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Slonim</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vern</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Walker</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen, Denmark</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper describes a pilot study to evaluate human analysts’ ability to identify the argumentation scheme and premises of an argument having an implicit conclusion. In preparation for the study, argumentation scheme definitions were crafted for genetics research articles. The schemes were defined in semantic terms, following a proposal to use semantic rules to mine arguments in that literature.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">green-2017-manual</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W17-5109</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W17-5109</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2017-09</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>73</start>
<end>78</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Manual Identification of Arguments with Implicit Conclusions Using Semantic Rules for Argument Mining
%A Green, Nancy
%Y Habernal, Ivan
%Y Gurevych, Iryna
%Y Ashley, Kevin
%Y Cardie, Claire
%Y Green, Nancy
%Y Litman, Diane
%Y Petasis, Georgios
%Y Reed, Chris
%Y Slonim, Noam
%Y Walker, Vern
%S Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining
%D 2017
%8 September
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Copenhagen, Denmark
%F green-2017-manual
%X This paper describes a pilot study to evaluate human analysts’ ability to identify the argumentation scheme and premises of an argument having an implicit conclusion. In preparation for the study, argumentation scheme definitions were crafted for genetics research articles. The schemes were defined in semantic terms, following a proposal to use semantic rules to mine arguments in that literature.
%R 10.18653/v1/W17-5109
%U https://aclanthology.org/W17-5109
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5109
%P 73-78
Markdown (Informal)
[Manual Identification of Arguments with Implicit Conclusions Using Semantic Rules for Argument Mining](https://aclanthology.org/W17-5109) (Green, ArgMining 2017)
ACL