@inproceedings{habernal-2018-computational,
title = "Computational Argumentation: A Journey Beyond Semantics, Logic, Opinions, and Easy Tasks",
author = "Habernal, Ivan",
editor = "Blanco, Eduardo and
Morante, Roser",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Semantics beyond Events and Roles",
month = jun,
year = "2018",
address = "New Orleans, Louisiana",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W18-1305",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W18-1305",
pages = "38",
abstract = "The classical view on argumentation, such that arguments are logical structures consisting of different distinguishable parts and that parties exchange arguments in a rational way, is prevalent in textbooks but nonexistent in the real world. Instead, argumentation is a multifaceted communication tool built upon humans{'} capabilities to easily use common sense, emotions, and social context. As humans, we are pretty good at it. Computational Argumentation tries to tackle these phenomena but has a long and not so easy way to go. In this talk, I would like to shed a light on several recent attempts to deal with argumentation computationally, such as addressing argument quality, understanding argument reasoning, dealing with fallacies, and how should we never ever argue online.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="habernal-2018-computational">
<titleInfo>
<title>Computational Argumentation: A Journey Beyond Semantics, Logic, Opinions, and Easy Tasks</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ivan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Habernal</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2018-06</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Semantics beyond Events and Roles</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Eduardo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Blanco</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Roser</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Morante</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">New Orleans, Louisiana</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The classical view on argumentation, such that arguments are logical structures consisting of different distinguishable parts and that parties exchange arguments in a rational way, is prevalent in textbooks but nonexistent in the real world. Instead, argumentation is a multifaceted communication tool built upon humans’ capabilities to easily use common sense, emotions, and social context. As humans, we are pretty good at it. Computational Argumentation tries to tackle these phenomena but has a long and not so easy way to go. In this talk, I would like to shed a light on several recent attempts to deal with argumentation computationally, such as addressing argument quality, understanding argument reasoning, dealing with fallacies, and how should we never ever argue online.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">habernal-2018-computational</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W18-1305</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W18-1305</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2018-06</date>
<detail type="page"><number>38</number></detail>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Computational Argumentation: A Journey Beyond Semantics, Logic, Opinions, and Easy Tasks
%A Habernal, Ivan
%Y Blanco, Eduardo
%Y Morante, Roser
%S Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Semantics beyond Events and Roles
%D 2018
%8 June
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C New Orleans, Louisiana
%F habernal-2018-computational
%X The classical view on argumentation, such that arguments are logical structures consisting of different distinguishable parts and that parties exchange arguments in a rational way, is prevalent in textbooks but nonexistent in the real world. Instead, argumentation is a multifaceted communication tool built upon humans’ capabilities to easily use common sense, emotions, and social context. As humans, we are pretty good at it. Computational Argumentation tries to tackle these phenomena but has a long and not so easy way to go. In this talk, I would like to shed a light on several recent attempts to deal with argumentation computationally, such as addressing argument quality, understanding argument reasoning, dealing with fallacies, and how should we never ever argue online.
%R 10.18653/v1/W18-1305
%U https://aclanthology.org/W18-1305
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-1305
%P 38
Markdown (Informal)
[Computational Argumentation: A Journey Beyond Semantics, Logic, Opinions, and Easy Tasks](https://aclanthology.org/W18-1305) (Habernal, SemBEaR 2018)
ACL