@inproceedings{castelle-2018-linguistic,
title = "The Linguistic Ideologies of Deep Abusive Language Classification",
author = "Castelle, Michael",
editor = "Fi{\v{s}}er, Darja and
Huang, Ruihong and
Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar and
Voigt, Rob and
Waseem, Zeerak and
Wernimont, Jacqueline",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online ({ALW}2)",
month = oct,
year = "2018",
address = "Brussels, Belgium",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W18-5120",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W18-5120",
pages = "160--170",
abstract = "This paper brings together theories from sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology to critically evaluate the so-called {``}language ideologies{''} {---} the set of beliefs and ways of speaking about language{---}in the practices of abusive language classification in modern machine learning-based NLP. This argument is made at both a conceptual and empirical level, as we review approaches to abusive language from different fields, and use two neural network methods to analyze three datasets developed for abusive language classification tasks (drawn from Wikipedia, Facebook, and StackOverflow). By evaluating and comparing these results, we argue for the importance of incorporating theories of pragmatics and metapragmatics into both the design of classification tasks as well as in ML architectures.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="castelle-2018-linguistic">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Linguistic Ideologies of Deep Abusive Language Classification</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Michael</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Castelle</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2018-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Darja</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Fišer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ruihong</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Huang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vinodkumar</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Prabhakaran</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rob</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Voigt</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Zeerak</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Waseem</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jacqueline</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wernimont</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Brussels, Belgium</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper brings together theories from sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology to critically evaluate the so-called “language ideologies” — the set of beliefs and ways of speaking about language—in the practices of abusive language classification in modern machine learning-based NLP. This argument is made at both a conceptual and empirical level, as we review approaches to abusive language from different fields, and use two neural network methods to analyze three datasets developed for abusive language classification tasks (drawn from Wikipedia, Facebook, and StackOverflow). By evaluating and comparing these results, we argue for the importance of incorporating theories of pragmatics and metapragmatics into both the design of classification tasks as well as in ML architectures.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">castelle-2018-linguistic</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W18-5120</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W18-5120</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2018-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>160</start>
<end>170</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T The Linguistic Ideologies of Deep Abusive Language Classification
%A Castelle, Michael
%Y Fišer, Darja
%Y Huang, Ruihong
%Y Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar
%Y Voigt, Rob
%Y Waseem, Zeerak
%Y Wernimont, Jacqueline
%S Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2)
%D 2018
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Brussels, Belgium
%F castelle-2018-linguistic
%X This paper brings together theories from sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology to critically evaluate the so-called “language ideologies” — the set of beliefs and ways of speaking about language—in the practices of abusive language classification in modern machine learning-based NLP. This argument is made at both a conceptual and empirical level, as we review approaches to abusive language from different fields, and use two neural network methods to analyze three datasets developed for abusive language classification tasks (drawn from Wikipedia, Facebook, and StackOverflow). By evaluating and comparing these results, we argue for the importance of incorporating theories of pragmatics and metapragmatics into both the design of classification tasks as well as in ML architectures.
%R 10.18653/v1/W18-5120
%U https://aclanthology.org/W18-5120
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-5120
%P 160-170
Markdown (Informal)
[The Linguistic Ideologies of Deep Abusive Language Classification](https://aclanthology.org/W18-5120) (Castelle, ALW 2018)
ACL