@inproceedings{jumelet-hupkes-2018-language,
title = "Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of {LSTM}s to Understand Negative Polarity Items",
author = "Jumelet, Jaap and
Hupkes, Dieuwke",
editor = "Linzen, Tal and
Chrupa{\l}a, Grzegorz and
Alishahi, Afra",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2018 {EMNLP} Workshop {B}lackbox{NLP}: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for {NLP}",
month = nov,
year = "2018",
address = "Brussels, Belgium",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W18-5424",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W18-5424",
pages = "222--231",
abstract = "In this paper, we attempt to link the inner workings of a neural language model to linguistic theory, focusing on a complex phenomenon well discussed in formal linguistics: (negative) polarity items. We briefly discuss the leading hypotheses about the licensing contexts that allow negative polarity items and evaluate to what extent a neural language model has the ability to correctly process a subset of such constructions. We show that the model finds a relation between the licensing context and the negative polarity item and appears to be aware of the \textit{scope} of this context, which we extract from a parse tree of the sentence. With this research, we hope to pave the way for other studies linking formal linguistics to deep learning.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="jumelet-hupkes-2018-language">
<titleInfo>
<title>Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Items</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jaap</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jumelet</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dieuwke</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hupkes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2018-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Linzen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Grzegorz</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chrupała</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Afra</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Alishahi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Brussels, Belgium</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>In this paper, we attempt to link the inner workings of a neural language model to linguistic theory, focusing on a complex phenomenon well discussed in formal linguistics: (negative) polarity items. We briefly discuss the leading hypotheses about the licensing contexts that allow negative polarity items and evaluate to what extent a neural language model has the ability to correctly process a subset of such constructions. We show that the model finds a relation between the licensing context and the negative polarity item and appears to be aware of the scope of this context, which we extract from a parse tree of the sentence. With this research, we hope to pave the way for other studies linking formal linguistics to deep learning.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">jumelet-hupkes-2018-language</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W18-5424</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W18-5424</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2018-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>222</start>
<end>231</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Items
%A Jumelet, Jaap
%A Hupkes, Dieuwke
%Y Linzen, Tal
%Y Chrupała, Grzegorz
%Y Alishahi, Afra
%S Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
%D 2018
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Brussels, Belgium
%F jumelet-hupkes-2018-language
%X In this paper, we attempt to link the inner workings of a neural language model to linguistic theory, focusing on a complex phenomenon well discussed in formal linguistics: (negative) polarity items. We briefly discuss the leading hypotheses about the licensing contexts that allow negative polarity items and evaluate to what extent a neural language model has the ability to correctly process a subset of such constructions. We show that the model finds a relation between the licensing context and the negative polarity item and appears to be aware of the scope of this context, which we extract from a parse tree of the sentence. With this research, we hope to pave the way for other studies linking formal linguistics to deep learning.
%R 10.18653/v1/W18-5424
%U https://aclanthology.org/W18-5424
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-5424
%P 222-231
Markdown (Informal)
[Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Items](https://aclanthology.org/W18-5424) (Jumelet & Hupkes, EMNLP 2018)
ACL