@inproceedings{shirai-etal-2019-annotating,
title = "Annotating with Pros and Cons of Technologies in Computer Science Papers",
author = "Shirai, Hono and
Inoue, Naoya and
Suzuki, Jun and
Inui, Kentaro",
editor = "Nastase, Vivi and
Roth, Benjamin and
Dietz, Laura and
McCallum, Andrew",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Workshop on Extracting Structured Knowledge from Scientific Publications",
month = jun,
year = "2019",
address = "Minneapolis, Minnesota",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-2605/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-2605",
pages = "37--42",
abstract = "This paper explores a task for extracting a technological expression and its pros/cons from computer science papers. We report ongoing efforts on an annotated corpus of pros/cons and an analysis of the nature of the automatic extraction task. Specifically, we show how to adapt the targeted sentiment analysis task for pros/cons extraction in computer science papers and conduct an annotation study. In order to identify the challenges of the automatic extraction task, we construct a strong baseline model and conduct an error analysis. The experiments show that pros/cons can be consistently annotated by several annotators, and that the task is challenging due to domain-specific knowledge. The annotated dataset is made publicly available for research purposes."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="shirai-etal-2019-annotating">
<titleInfo>
<title>Annotating with Pros and Cons of Technologies in Computer Science Papers</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hono</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Shirai</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Naoya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Inoue</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jun</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Suzuki</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kentaro</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Inui</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-06</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Extracting Structured Knowledge from Scientific Publications</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vivi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Nastase</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Benjamin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Roth</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laura</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dietz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McCallum</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Minneapolis, Minnesota</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper explores a task for extracting a technological expression and its pros/cons from computer science papers. We report ongoing efforts on an annotated corpus of pros/cons and an analysis of the nature of the automatic extraction task. Specifically, we show how to adapt the targeted sentiment analysis task for pros/cons extraction in computer science papers and conduct an annotation study. In order to identify the challenges of the automatic extraction task, we construct a strong baseline model and conduct an error analysis. The experiments show that pros/cons can be consistently annotated by several annotators, and that the task is challenging due to domain-specific knowledge. The annotated dataset is made publicly available for research purposes.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">shirai-etal-2019-annotating</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W19-2605</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-2605/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-06</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>37</start>
<end>42</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Annotating with Pros and Cons of Technologies in Computer Science Papers
%A Shirai, Hono
%A Inoue, Naoya
%A Suzuki, Jun
%A Inui, Kentaro
%Y Nastase, Vivi
%Y Roth, Benjamin
%Y Dietz, Laura
%Y McCallum, Andrew
%S Proceedings of the Workshop on Extracting Structured Knowledge from Scientific Publications
%D 2019
%8 June
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Minneapolis, Minnesota
%F shirai-etal-2019-annotating
%X This paper explores a task for extracting a technological expression and its pros/cons from computer science papers. We report ongoing efforts on an annotated corpus of pros/cons and an analysis of the nature of the automatic extraction task. Specifically, we show how to adapt the targeted sentiment analysis task for pros/cons extraction in computer science papers and conduct an annotation study. In order to identify the challenges of the automatic extraction task, we construct a strong baseline model and conduct an error analysis. The experiments show that pros/cons can be consistently annotated by several annotators, and that the task is challenging due to domain-specific knowledge. The annotated dataset is made publicly available for research purposes.
%R 10.18653/v1/W19-2605
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-2605/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-2605
%P 37-42
Markdown (Informal)
[Annotating with Pros and Cons of Technologies in Computer Science Papers](https://aclanthology.org/W19-2605/) (Shirai et al., NAACL 2019)
ACL