@inproceedings{melnick-wasow-2019-priming,
title = "Priming vs. Inhibition of Optional Infinitival {``}to{''}",
author = "Melnick, Robin and
Wasow, Thomas",
editor = "Chersoni, Emmanuele and
Jacobs, Cassandra and
Lenci, Alessandro and
Linzen, Tal and
Pr{\'e}vot, Laurent and
Santus, Enrico",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics",
month = jun,
year = "2019",
address = "Minneapolis, Minnesota",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-2902",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-2902",
pages = "11--19",
abstract = "The word {``}to{''} that precedes verbs in English infinitives is optional in at least two environments: in what Wasow et al. (2015) previously called the {``}do-be{''} construction, and in the complement of {``}help{''}, which we explore in the present work. In the {``}do-be{''} construction, Wasow et al. found that a preceding infinitival {``}to{''} increases the use of following optional {``}to{''}, but the use of {``}to{''} in the complement of help is reduced following {``}to help{''}. We examine two hypotheses regarding why the same function word is primed by prior use in one construction and inhibited in another. We then test predictions made by the two hypotheses, finding support for one of them.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="melnick-wasow-2019-priming">
<titleInfo>
<title>Priming vs. Inhibition of Optional Infinitival “to”</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Robin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Melnick</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Thomas</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wasow</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-06</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Emmanuele</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chersoni</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Cassandra</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alessandro</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lenci</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Linzen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laurent</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Prévot</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Enrico</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Santus</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Minneapolis, Minnesota</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The word “to” that precedes verbs in English infinitives is optional in at least two environments: in what Wasow et al. (2015) previously called the “do-be” construction, and in the complement of “help”, which we explore in the present work. In the “do-be” construction, Wasow et al. found that a preceding infinitival “to” increases the use of following optional “to”, but the use of “to” in the complement of help is reduced following “to help”. We examine two hypotheses regarding why the same function word is primed by prior use in one construction and inhibited in another. We then test predictions made by the two hypotheses, finding support for one of them.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">melnick-wasow-2019-priming</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W19-2902</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-2902</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-06</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>11</start>
<end>19</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Priming vs. Inhibition of Optional Infinitival “to”
%A Melnick, Robin
%A Wasow, Thomas
%Y Chersoni, Emmanuele
%Y Jacobs, Cassandra
%Y Lenci, Alessandro
%Y Linzen, Tal
%Y Prévot, Laurent
%Y Santus, Enrico
%S Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics
%D 2019
%8 June
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Minneapolis, Minnesota
%F melnick-wasow-2019-priming
%X The word “to” that precedes verbs in English infinitives is optional in at least two environments: in what Wasow et al. (2015) previously called the “do-be” construction, and in the complement of “help”, which we explore in the present work. In the “do-be” construction, Wasow et al. found that a preceding infinitival “to” increases the use of following optional “to”, but the use of “to” in the complement of help is reduced following “to help”. We examine two hypotheses regarding why the same function word is primed by prior use in one construction and inhibited in another. We then test predictions made by the two hypotheses, finding support for one of them.
%R 10.18653/v1/W19-2902
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-2902
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-2902
%P 11-19
Markdown (Informal)
[Priming vs. Inhibition of Optional Infinitival “to”](https://aclanthology.org/W19-2902) (Melnick & Wasow, CMCL 2019)
ACL