@inproceedings{oseki-etal-2019-modeling,
title = "Modeling Hierarchical Syntactic Structures in Morphological Processing",
author = "Oseki, Yohei and
Yang, Charles and
Marantz, Alec",
editor = "Chersoni, Emmanuele and
Jacobs, Cassandra and
Lenci, Alessandro and
Linzen, Tal and
Pr{\'e}vot, Laurent and
Santus, Enrico",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics",
month = jun,
year = "2019",
address = "Minneapolis, Minnesota",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-2905",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-2905",
pages = "43--52",
abstract = "Sentences are represented as hierarchical syntactic structures, which have been successfully modeled in sentence processing. In contrast, despite the theoretical agreement on hierarchical syntactic structures within words, words have been argued to be computationally less complex than sentences and implemented by finite-state models as linear strings of morphemes, and even the psychological reality of morphemes has been denied. In this paper, extending the computational models employed in sentence processing to morphological processing, we performed a computational simulation experiment where, given incremental surprisal as a linking hypothesis, five computational models with different representational assumptions were evaluated against human reaction times in visual lexical decision experiments available from the English Lexicon Project (ELP), a {``}shared task{''} in the morphological processing literature. The simulation experiment demonstrated that (i) {``}amorphous{''} models without morpheme units underperformed relative to {``}morphous{''} models, (ii) a computational model with hierarchical syntactic structures, Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar (PCFG), most accurately explained human reaction times, and (iii) this performance was achieved on top of surface frequency effects. These results strongly suggest that morphological processing tracks morphemes incrementally from left to right and parses them into hierarchical syntactic structures, contrary to {``}amorphous{''} and finite-state models of morphological processing.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="oseki-etal-2019-modeling">
<titleInfo>
<title>Modeling Hierarchical Syntactic Structures in Morphological Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yohei</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Oseki</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Charles</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Yang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alec</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Marantz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-06</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Emmanuele</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chersoni</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Cassandra</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alessandro</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lenci</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Linzen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laurent</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Prévot</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Enrico</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Santus</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Minneapolis, Minnesota</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Sentences are represented as hierarchical syntactic structures, which have been successfully modeled in sentence processing. In contrast, despite the theoretical agreement on hierarchical syntactic structures within words, words have been argued to be computationally less complex than sentences and implemented by finite-state models as linear strings of morphemes, and even the psychological reality of morphemes has been denied. In this paper, extending the computational models employed in sentence processing to morphological processing, we performed a computational simulation experiment where, given incremental surprisal as a linking hypothesis, five computational models with different representational assumptions were evaluated against human reaction times in visual lexical decision experiments available from the English Lexicon Project (ELP), a “shared task” in the morphological processing literature. The simulation experiment demonstrated that (i) “amorphous” models without morpheme units underperformed relative to “morphous” models, (ii) a computational model with hierarchical syntactic structures, Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar (PCFG), most accurately explained human reaction times, and (iii) this performance was achieved on top of surface frequency effects. These results strongly suggest that morphological processing tracks morphemes incrementally from left to right and parses them into hierarchical syntactic structures, contrary to “amorphous” and finite-state models of morphological processing.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">oseki-etal-2019-modeling</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W19-2905</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-2905</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-06</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>43</start>
<end>52</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Modeling Hierarchical Syntactic Structures in Morphological Processing
%A Oseki, Yohei
%A Yang, Charles
%A Marantz, Alec
%Y Chersoni, Emmanuele
%Y Jacobs, Cassandra
%Y Lenci, Alessandro
%Y Linzen, Tal
%Y Prévot, Laurent
%Y Santus, Enrico
%S Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics
%D 2019
%8 June
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Minneapolis, Minnesota
%F oseki-etal-2019-modeling
%X Sentences are represented as hierarchical syntactic structures, which have been successfully modeled in sentence processing. In contrast, despite the theoretical agreement on hierarchical syntactic structures within words, words have been argued to be computationally less complex than sentences and implemented by finite-state models as linear strings of morphemes, and even the psychological reality of morphemes has been denied. In this paper, extending the computational models employed in sentence processing to morphological processing, we performed a computational simulation experiment where, given incremental surprisal as a linking hypothesis, five computational models with different representational assumptions were evaluated against human reaction times in visual lexical decision experiments available from the English Lexicon Project (ELP), a “shared task” in the morphological processing literature. The simulation experiment demonstrated that (i) “amorphous” models without morpheme units underperformed relative to “morphous” models, (ii) a computational model with hierarchical syntactic structures, Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar (PCFG), most accurately explained human reaction times, and (iii) this performance was achieved on top of surface frequency effects. These results strongly suggest that morphological processing tracks morphemes incrementally from left to right and parses them into hierarchical syntactic structures, contrary to “amorphous” and finite-state models of morphological processing.
%R 10.18653/v1/W19-2905
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-2905
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-2905
%P 43-52
Markdown (Informal)
[Modeling Hierarchical Syntactic Structures in Morphological Processing](https://aclanthology.org/W19-2905) (Oseki et al., CMCL 2019)
ACL