@inproceedings{prabhumoye-etal-2019-principled,
title = "Principled Frameworks for Evaluating Ethics in {NLP} Systems",
author = "Prabhumoye, Shrimai and
Mayfield, Elijah and
Black, Alan W",
editor = "Axelrod, Amittai and
Yang, Diyi and
Cunha, Rossana and
Shaikh, Samira and
Waseem, Zeerak",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Widening NLP",
month = aug,
year = "2019",
address = "Florence, Italy",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-3637/",
pages = "118--121",
abstract = "We critique recent work on ethics in natural language processing. Those discussions have focused on data collection, experimental design, and interventions in modeling. But we argue that we ought to first understand the frameworks of ethics that are being used to evaluate the fairness and justice of algorithmic systems. Here, we begin that discussion by outlining deontological and consequentialist ethics, and make predictions on the research agenda prioritized by each."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="prabhumoye-etal-2019-principled">
<titleInfo>
<title>Principled Frameworks for Evaluating Ethics in NLP Systems</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shrimai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Prabhumoye</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Elijah</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mayfield</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alan</namePart>
<namePart type="given">W</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Black</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Widening NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Amittai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Axelrod</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Diyi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Yang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rossana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Cunha</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Samira</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Shaikh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Zeerak</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Waseem</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Florence, Italy</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>We critique recent work on ethics in natural language processing. Those discussions have focused on data collection, experimental design, and interventions in modeling. But we argue that we ought to first understand the frameworks of ethics that are being used to evaluate the fairness and justice of algorithmic systems. Here, we begin that discussion by outlining deontological and consequentialist ethics, and make predictions on the research agenda prioritized by each.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">prabhumoye-etal-2019-principled</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-3637/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>118</start>
<end>121</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Principled Frameworks for Evaluating Ethics in NLP Systems
%A Prabhumoye, Shrimai
%A Mayfield, Elijah
%A Black, Alan W.
%Y Axelrod, Amittai
%Y Yang, Diyi
%Y Cunha, Rossana
%Y Shaikh, Samira
%Y Waseem, Zeerak
%S Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Widening NLP
%D 2019
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Florence, Italy
%F prabhumoye-etal-2019-principled
%X We critique recent work on ethics in natural language processing. Those discussions have focused on data collection, experimental design, and interventions in modeling. But we argue that we ought to first understand the frameworks of ethics that are being used to evaluate the fairness and justice of algorithmic systems. Here, we begin that discussion by outlining deontological and consequentialist ethics, and make predictions on the research agenda prioritized by each.
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-3637/
%P 118-121
Markdown (Informal)
[Principled Frameworks for Evaluating Ethics in NLP Systems](https://aclanthology.org/W19-3637/) (Prabhumoye et al., WiNLP 2019)
ACL