@inproceedings{huber-etal-2019-aligning,
title = "Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining",
author = "Huber, Laurine and
Toussaint, Yannick and
Roze, Charlotte and
Dargnat, Mathilde and
Braud, Chlo{\'e}",
editor = "Stein, Benno and
Wachsmuth, Henning",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining",
month = aug,
year = "2019",
address = "Florence, Italy",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-4504",
pages = "35--40",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate similarities between discourse and argumentation structures by aligning subtrees in a corpus containing both annotations. Contrary to previous works, we focus on comparing sub-structures and not only relations matches. Using data mining techniques, we show that discourse and argumentation most often align well, and the double annotation allows to derive a mapping between structures. Moreover, this approach enables the study of similarities between discourse structures and differences in their expressive power.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="huber-etal-2019-aligning">
<titleInfo>
<title>Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laurine</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Huber</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yannick</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Toussaint</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Charlotte</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Roze</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mathilde</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dargnat</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chloé</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Braud</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Benno</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stein</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henning</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wachsmuth</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Florence, Italy</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>In this paper, we investigate similarities between discourse and argumentation structures by aligning subtrees in a corpus containing both annotations. Contrary to previous works, we focus on comparing sub-structures and not only relations matches. Using data mining techniques, we show that discourse and argumentation most often align well, and the double annotation allows to derive a mapping between structures. Moreover, this approach enables the study of similarities between discourse structures and differences in their expressive power.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">huber-etal-2019-aligning</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W19-4504</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>35</start>
<end>40</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining
%A Huber, Laurine
%A Toussaint, Yannick
%A Roze, Charlotte
%A Dargnat, Mathilde
%A Braud, Chloé
%Y Stein, Benno
%Y Wachsmuth, Henning
%S Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining
%D 2019
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Florence, Italy
%F huber-etal-2019-aligning
%X In this paper, we investigate similarities between discourse and argumentation structures by aligning subtrees in a corpus containing both annotations. Contrary to previous works, we focus on comparing sub-structures and not only relations matches. Using data mining techniques, we show that discourse and argumentation most often align well, and the double annotation allows to derive a mapping between structures. Moreover, this approach enables the study of similarities between discourse structures and differences in their expressive power.
%R 10.18653/v1/W19-4504
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-4504
%P 35-40
Markdown (Informal)
[Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining](https://aclanthology.org/W19-4504) (Huber et al., ArgMining 2019)
ACL