Evaluation of Scientific Elements for Text Similarity in Biomedical Publications

Mariana Neves, Daniel Butzke, Barbara Grune


Abstract
Rhetorical elements from scientific publications provide a more structured view of the document and allow algorithms to focus on particular parts of the text. We surveyed the literature for previously proposed schemes for rhetorical elements and present an overview of its current state of the art. We also searched for available tools using these schemes and applied four tools for our particular task of ranking biomedical abstracts based on text similarity. Comparison of the tools with two strong baselines shows that the predictions provided by the ArguminSci tool can support our use case of mining alternative methods for animal experiments.
Anthology ID:
W19-4515
Volume:
Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining
Month:
August
Year:
2019
Address:
Florence, Italy
Editors:
Benno Stein, Henning Wachsmuth
Venue:
ArgMining
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
124–135
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/W19-4515
DOI:
10.18653/v1/W19-4515
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Mariana Neves, Daniel Butzke, and Barbara Grune. 2019. Evaluation of Scientific Elements for Text Similarity in Biomedical Publications. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining, pages 124–135, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Evaluation of Scientific Elements for Text Similarity in Biomedical Publications (Neves et al., ArgMining 2019)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/W19-4515.pdf
Code
 mariananeves/scientific-elements-text-similarity
Data
PubMed RCT