@inproceedings{lindahl-etal-2019-towards,
title = "Towards Assessing Argumentation Annotation - A First Step",
author = "Lindahl, Anna and
Borin, Lars and
Rouces, Jacobo",
editor = "Stein, Benno and
Wachsmuth, Henning",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining",
month = aug,
year = "2019",
address = "Florence, Italy",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-4520",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-4520",
pages = "177--186",
abstract = "This paper presents a first attempt at using Walton{'}s argumentation schemes for annotating arguments in Swedish political text and assessing the feasibility of using this particular set of schemes with two linguistically trained annotators. The texts are not pre-annotated with argumentation structure beforehand. The results show that the annotators differ both in number of annotated arguments and selection of the conclusion and premises which make up the arguments. They also differ in their labeling of the schemes, but grouping the schemes increases their agreement. The outcome from this will be used to develop guidelines for future annotations.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="lindahl-etal-2019-towards">
<titleInfo>
<title>Towards Assessing Argumentation Annotation - A First Step</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lindahl</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lars</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Borin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jacobo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rouces</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Benno</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stein</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henning</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wachsmuth</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Florence, Italy</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper presents a first attempt at using Walton’s argumentation schemes for annotating arguments in Swedish political text and assessing the feasibility of using this particular set of schemes with two linguistically trained annotators. The texts are not pre-annotated with argumentation structure beforehand. The results show that the annotators differ both in number of annotated arguments and selection of the conclusion and premises which make up the arguments. They also differ in their labeling of the schemes, but grouping the schemes increases their agreement. The outcome from this will be used to develop guidelines for future annotations.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">lindahl-etal-2019-towards</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W19-4520</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-4520</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>177</start>
<end>186</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Towards Assessing Argumentation Annotation - A First Step
%A Lindahl, Anna
%A Borin, Lars
%A Rouces, Jacobo
%Y Stein, Benno
%Y Wachsmuth, Henning
%S Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining
%D 2019
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Florence, Italy
%F lindahl-etal-2019-towards
%X This paper presents a first attempt at using Walton’s argumentation schemes for annotating arguments in Swedish political text and assessing the feasibility of using this particular set of schemes with two linguistically trained annotators. The texts are not pre-annotated with argumentation structure beforehand. The results show that the annotators differ both in number of annotated arguments and selection of the conclusion and premises which make up the arguments. They also differ in their labeling of the schemes, but grouping the schemes increases their agreement. The outcome from this will be used to develop guidelines for future annotations.
%R 10.18653/v1/W19-4520
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-4520
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-4520
%P 177-186
Markdown (Informal)
[Towards Assessing Argumentation Annotation - A First Step](https://aclanthology.org/W19-4520) (Lindahl et al., ArgMining 2019)
ACL