Ana Guerberof Arenas

Also published as: Ana Guerberof Arenas, Ana Guerberof-Arenas


2023

pdf bib
Migrant communities living in the Netherlands and their use of MT in healthcare settings
Susana Valdez | Ana Guerberof Arenas | Kars Ligtenberg
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation

As part of a larger project on the use of MT in healthcare settings among migrant communities, this paper investigates if, when, how and with what (potential) challenges migrants use MT based on a survey of 201 non-native speakers of Dutch currently living in the Netherlands. Three main findings stand out from our analysis. First, most migrants use MT to understand health information in Dutch and communicate with health professionals. How MT is used and received varies depending on the context and the L2 language level, as well as age, but not on the educational level. Second, some users face challenges of different kinds, including a lack of trust or perceived inaccuracies. Some of these challenges are related to comprehension, which brings us to our third point. We argue that a more nuanced understanding of medical translation is needed in expert-to-non-expert health communication. This questionnaire helped us identify several topics we hope to explore in the project’s next phase.

2022

pdf bib
CREAMT: Creativity and narrative engagement of literary texts translated by translators and NMT
Ana Guerberof Arenas | Antonio Toral
Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation

We present here the EU-funded project CREAMT that seeks to understand what is meant by creativity in different translation modalities, e.g. machine translation, post-editing or professional translation. Focusing on the textual elements that determine creativity in translated literary texts and the reader experience, CREAMT uses a novel, interdisciplinary approach to assess how effective MT is in literary translation considering creativity in translation and the ultimate user: the reader.

pdf bib
DivEMT: Neural Machine Translation Post-Editing Effort Across Typologically Diverse Languages
Gabriele Sarti | Arianna Bisazza | Ana Guerberof-Arenas | Antonio Toral
Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

We introduce DivEMT, the first publicly available post-editing study of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) over a typologically diverse set of target languages. Using a strictly controlled setup, 18 professional translators were instructed to translate or post-edit the same set of English documents into Arabic, Dutch, Italian, Turkish, Ukrainian, and Vietnamese. During the process, their edits, keystrokes, editing times and pauses were recorded, enabling an in-depth, cross-lingual evaluation of NMT quality and post-editing effectiveness. Using this new dataset, we assess the impact of two state-of-the-art NMT systems, Google Translate and the multilingual mBART-50 model, on translation productivity. We find that post-editing is consistently faster than translation from scratch. However, the magnitude of productivity gains varies widely across systems and languages, highlighting major disparities in post-editing effectiveness for languages at different degrees of typological relatedness to English, even when controlling for system architecture and training data size. We publicly release the complete dataset including all collected behavioral data, to foster new research on the translation capabilities of NMT systems for typologically diverse languages.

2019

pdf bib
What is the impact of raw MT on Japanese users of Word: preliminary results of a usability study using eye-tracking
Ana Guerberof Arenas | Joss Moorkens | Sharon O’Brien
Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XVII: Research Track

2018

pdf bib
Reading Comprehension of Machine Translation Output: What Makes for a Better Read?
Sheila Castilho | Ana Guerberof Arenas
Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation

This paper reports on a pilot experiment that compares two different machine translation (MT) paradigms in reading comprehension tests. To explore a suitable methodology, we set up a pilot experiment with a group of six users (with English, Spanish and Simplified Chinese languages) using an English Language Testing System (IELTS), and an eye-tracker. The users were asked to read three texts in their native language: either the original English text (for the English speakers) or the machine-translated text (for the Spanish and Simplified Chinese speakers). The original texts were machine-translated via two MT systems: neural (NMT) and statistical (SMT). The users were also asked to rank satisfaction statements on a 3-point scale after reading each text and answering the respective comprehension questions. After all tasks were completed, a post-task retrospective interview took place to gather qualitative data. The findings suggest that the users from the target languages completed more tasks in less time with a higher level of satisfaction when using translations from the NMT system.