Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong Helpfulness, Harmlessness, and Honesty (3H) alignment in English-centric settings, but these gains transfer poorly to low-resource languages due to cultural mismatches. Existing multilingual 3H benchmarks rely predominantly on automated translation or LLM based synthesis, propagating source-language biases while sacrificing local relevance. To address this gap, we introduce Pak3H1, the first human-validated, culturally contextualized Urdu benchmark suite for 3H alignment, comprising PakAlpaca (helpfulness), PakBeaverTails (harmlessness), and PakTruthfulQA (honesty). Our multi-stage pipeline integrates manual cultural adaptation and dictionary-guided post editing to prioritize native speaker judgment, ensuring both semantic fidelity and contextual authenticity. Zero-shot evaluations across multiple open and proprietary LLM architectures reveal systematic cross-lingual alignment gaps: helpfulness win rates decline under localized contexts, harmlessness guardrails break down against regional safety risks, and composite honesty metrics degrade substantially due to localized factual constraints. These findings expose structural limitations in current alignment approaches, underscoring the necessity of human-guided localization for equitable multilingual evaluation.

With the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various applications, it is imperative to ensure their fairness across all user communities. However, most LLMs are trained and evaluated on Western centric data, with little attention paid to low-resource languages and regional contexts. To address this gap, we introduce PakBBQ, a culturally and regionally adapted extension of the original Bias Benchmark for Question Answering (BBQ) dataset. PakBBQ comprises over 214 templates, 17180 QA pairs across 8 categories in both English and Urdu, covering eight bias dimensions including age, disability, appearance, gender, socio-economic status, religious, regional affiliation, and language formality that are relevant in Pakistan. We evaluate multiple multilingual LLMs under both ambiguous and explicitly disambiguated contexts, as well as negative versus non negative question framings. Our experiments reveal (i) an average accuracy gain of 12% with disambiguation, (ii) consistently stronger counter bias behaviors in Urdu than in English, and (iii) marked framing effects that reduce stereotypical responses when questions are posed negatively. These findings highlight the importance of contextualized benchmarks and simple prompt engineering strategies for bias mitigation in low resource settings.