This paper presents the participation of the L3IRIT team in SemEval Task 4.The team is a joint research group working on narrative extraction from historical text, led by the IRIT laboratory (University of Toulouse) and the L3i laboratory (University of La Rochelle). Our participation is grounded in the construction of a novel bilingual resource extracted from Wikipedia by automatically aligning film plots. Leveraging this dataset, we train embedding models using contrastive learning objectives to capture higher-level narrative structures more effectively. The resulting resource goes beyond surface-level lexical overlap, providing supervision for narrative similarity without manual annotation. In addition, we introduce a named-entity masking strategy designed to promote narrative abstraction and reduce superficial entity-based matching. Overall, our approach aims to support representation learning that captures structural and event-level similarities across stories in different languages more effectively.Our system ranked in 24 of the 44 scoreboards for Task A and 20 of the 27 scoreboards for Task B, achieving accuracies of 65.75 and 61.00, respectively.

Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Named Entity Linking (NEL) are core tasks in entity extraction, yet their robustness is limited when applied to noisy documents, such as those generated by Optical Character Recognition (OCR) over historical documents. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown strong zero-shot and few-shot performance on NER and NEL tasks, prior work has largely focused on using LLMs as direct predictors rather than evaluating extraction performance. In this study, we explore the feasibility of using LLMs as learned evaluators to estimate the quality of NER/NEL outputs, especially in settings where human-annotated references are unavailable at inference time. We propose supervised approaches that fine-tune LLMs to predict quality scores based on training data with gold annotations, enabling reference-free quality estimation once trained. Experiments on the HIPE-2020 benchmark across English, French, and German languages demonstrate that fine-tuned LLMs provide reliable estimates of output quality. Our findings suggest that LLM-based evaluation can support quality control and enable evaluation in noisy setting.

Extracting structured, machine-readable compliance criteria from regulatory documents remains an open challenge. Single-pass language models hallucinate structural elements, lose hierarchical relationships, and fail to resolve inter-document dependencies. We introduce RegReAct, a self-correcting multi-agent framework that decomposes regulatory information extraction into seven specialized stages, each with an Observe–Diagnose–Repair (ODR) loop that validates outputs against the source, correcting not only model hallucinations but also cross-reference errors in the regulations themselves. To ensure structural accuracy, RegReAct constructs a typed criterion graph; to ensure completeness, it resolves external dependencies by retrieving, summarizing, and embedding referenced legal content inline, producing self-contained outputs. Applying RegReAct to three EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts, we construct a dataset comprising 242 activities with over 4,800 hierarchical criteria, thresholds, and enriched source summaries. Evaluation against a GPT-4o single-pass baseline shows that RegReAct outperforms it across all structural and semantic metrics.

Dialectal machine translation remains challenging due to limited data and strong linguistic variation not captured by standard benchmarks, which often assume standardized and well–edited text. We study Polish–Silesian MT using neural and rule–based systems, evaluating on SiLTT — a new Pol–Szl testset, alongside established BOUQuET and FLORES benchmarks. Results show our rule–based system is consistently strongest on SiLTT and BOUQuET datasets and that TranslateGemma fine–tuned on a curated dataset improves over strong neural baselines but does not surpass the rule–based system in dialectal settings. We release SiLTT and our best neural model to support further research.

Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promise for historical entity linking, but preference optimization for this task is often formulated with only one negative candidate per training instance. This discards information from the remaining candidates retrieved for the same mention. We introduce multi-negative direct preference optimisation (MDPO), a reference-based pairwise objective that compares the correct entity with all valid rejected candidates associated with each mention. MDPO preserves the Bradley-Terry formulation of DPO while exploiting the complete candidate set through masked, length-normalised sequence scores. We evaluate MDPO on hipe-2020 and newseye, covering French, German, English, Swedish, and Finnish historical newspaper text. Experiments show that MDPO improves over supervised fine-tuning and single-negative DPO, with particularly strong gains for NIL mentions, semantic ambiguity, OCR noise, and historically difficult names. Further analyses disentangle candidate-generation and selection errors, showing that candidate retrieval remains a key bottleneck for end-to-end entity linking. These results demonstrate that incorporating all within-instance negative candidates is a simple and effective improvement for LLM-based historical entity linking.

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as factual knowledge sources, yet reliable deployment requires not only accurate predictions but also well-calibrated confidence estimates. While prior work on temporal robustness has primarily focused on changes in factual accuracy over time, we study temporal confidence calibration: whether model confidence remains aligned with correctness across questions associated with different reference times. We evaluate multiple LLMs on temporally grounded question answering benchmarks spanning both historical and dynamically evolving facts, comparing five confidence estimation strategies using Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Brier Score computed across temporal slices. Our experiments reveal substantial temporal miscalibration: as factual accuracy varies across time, model confidence often fails to track these changes proportionally, leading to pronounced overconfidence on time-sensitive queries. Across the evaluated confidence estimators, no single method consistently dominates: P(True) and Token Probability Confidence perform best most often, while the optimal estimator varies across models and datasets. We further show that global temperature scaling improves calibration but leaves meaningful period-specific variation, indicating that standard post-hoc calibration does not fully eliminate temporal miscalibration. These findings highlight temporal calibration as an important and previously underexplored dimension of LLM reliability.

The performance of large language models (LLMs) tends to degrade for extremely low-resource languages, primarily due to the lack of labeled training data. Despite growing interest, the availability of high-quality natural language processing (NLP) datasets for these languages remains limited. This paper addresses such gap by focusing on Ladin, an endangered Romance language, specifically the Val Badia variant. Leveraging a small set of parallel Ladin–Italian sentence pairs, we create synthetic datasets for sentiment analysis and question answering by translating monolingual Italian data. To ensure linguistic quality, we apply rigorous filtering and back-translation procedures in our method. We further demonstrate that incorporating these synthetic datasets into machine translation training leads to substantial improvements over existing Italian–Ladin translation baselines. Our contributions include sentiment analysis and question answering datasets for Ladin, establishing foundational resources that support broader NLP research and downstream applications for underrepresented languages.

Information Retrieval (IR) is fundamental to many modern NLP applications. The rise of dense retrieval (DR), using neural networks to learn semantic vector representations, has significantly advanced IR performance. Central to training effective dense retrievers through contrastive learning is the selection of informative negative samples. Synthesizing 35 seminal papers, this survey provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of negative sampling techniques in dense IR. Our unique contribution is the focus on modern NLP applications and the inclusion of recent Large Language Model (LLM)-driven methods, an area absent in prior reviews. We propose a taxonomy that categorizes techniques, including random, static/dynamically mined, and synthetic datasets. We then analyze these approaches with respect to trade-offs between effectiveness, computational cost, and implementation difficulty. The survey concludes by outlining current challenges and promising future directions for the use of LLM-generated synthetic data.

In an era of rampant misinformation, generating reliable news explanations is vital, especially for underrepresented languages like Hindi. Lacking robust automated tools, Hindi faces challenges in scaling misinformation detection. To bridge this gap, we propose DeFactoX, a novel framework integrating Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with Curriculum learning to align machine-generated explanations with human reasoning. Fact-checked explanations from credible sources serve as preferred responses, while LLM outputs highlight system limitations and serve as non-preferred responses. At the core of this framework lies Hin-DPO, an enhanced variant of DPO that enriches the loss function with two novel parameters, Actuality and Finesse, enhancing explanation quality and consistency. Experiments with LLMs (Mistral, Llama, Gemma) and PLMs (mBART, mT5) confirm the framework’s effectiveness in generating coherent, contextually relevant explanations.

Existing benchmarks treat multi-turn conversation and reasoning-intensive retrieval separately, yet real-world information seeking requires both. To bridge this gap, we present a benchmark for reasoning-based conversational information retrieval comprising 707 conversations (2,971 turns) across eleven domains. To ensure quality, our Decomposition-and-Verification framework transforms complex queries into fact-grounded multi-turn dialogues through multi-level validation, where atomic facts are verified against sources and explicit retrieval reasoning is generated for each turn. Comprehensive evaluation reveals that combining conversation history with reasoning doubles retrieval performance (Baseline .236 → History+Reasoning .479 nDCG@10), while reasoning-specialized models substantially outperform dense encoders. Despite these gains, further analysis highlights that implicit reasoning remains challenging, particularly when logical connections are not explicitly stated in the text. [https://github.com/RECOR-Benchmark/RECOR]

Many production RAG systems implement retrieval abstention by thresholding raw similarity scores, implicitly treating score magnitude as a confidence signal. We demonstrate that this practice degrades systematically as queries require reasoning beyond semantic matching. Across 11 retrieval architectures and 28 datasets, neural retrievers consistently assign high similarity scores to semantically related but constraint-violating documents, causing magnitude-based thresholds to collapse toward near-random abstention performance on logical and temporal reasoning tasks—a failure we term the Magnitude Mirage. To address this without computationally expensive alternatives, we conduct a large-scale empirical study of six zero-cost Query Performance Prediction (QPP) metrics across three cognitive tiers: semantic matching (BEIR), logical reasoning (BRIGHT), and temporal reasoning (TEMPO). Our central finding is that the key improvement comes from abandoning magnitude in favor of score-distribution signals: the gain from this shift exceeds the differences among distributional alternatives by a factor of 5–10×. In particular, Score Gap (s₁ - s_k) and a practical adaptation of Score Magnitude and Variance (LSMV) improve abstention AUROC by up to 0.16 in settings where magnitude-based confidence provides little discriminative power. These methods require no additional inference, retraining, or latency, making them a practical zero-cost replacement for magnitude thresholding in deployed RAG systems.

Oblique retrieval, recently introduced by OBLIQ-Bench, asks a retriever to surface documents whose relevance is determined by a latent attribute (an implicit stance, an analogous reasoning technique, an authorial fingerprint, or a vague tip-of-the-tongue recollection) that has little or no surface expression in the document. State-of-the-art dense encoders and agentic search pipelines built around frontier language models leave a large first-stage bottleneck on these tasks, while the same language models reliably verify relevance when shown candidates. We address this with OBLIQ-IR, a single-vector dense retriever whose training mixture combines per-mechanism synthetic queries with a new form of cross-model supervision: kNN-graph distillation from a frozen authorship encoder, which transfers a style-versus-topic inductive bias into the student. A 3B retriever fine-tuned reaches 0.211 NDCG@10 on Writing-Style, 0.171 on Math, 0.177 on Twitter, and 0.281 on Congress, improving over the GPT-5.2 Multi-Hop Agent by 0.010 to 0.098 NDCG@10 and over Gemini-2-Embedding by 0.027 to 0.222 NDCG@10 on every reported task.

Financial and tabular question answering requires more than fluent reasoning: answers must be grounded in the exact facts, formulas, units, signs, and scales that support them. A single misread cell or incorrect operation can silently produce a plausible but wrong result. We introduce MOCA-Agent, a market-of-claims code agent that replaces free-form multi-agent debate with claim-level verification. The system decomposes each question into typed atomic claims, asks specialist trader agents to buy or sell those claims, clears their orders into confidence-weighted accept/reject decisions, and synthesizes an executable Python program from market-supported evidence. A code-aware verifier then checks the program for execution, structural consistency, and common financial reasoning errors, with at most one market-aware repair round. Across ten public benchmarks spanning financial numerical reasoning, general tabular reasoning, ESG question answering, and multimodal chart reasoning, MOCA-Agent achieves strong performance using a fixed Qwen3.6-27B backbone, including 78.3% on FinQA, 76.0% on FinanceMath, 71.2% on MultiHiertt, 86.9% on ESGenius, and 85.6% average on FinChart-Bench. These results show that aggregating evidence at the level of atomic claims, rather than whole answers, improves robustness in high-stakes numerical reasoning.

Reasoning-intensive retrieval remains difficult for small models. Compact public ColBERTs are usually trained on general-purpose corpora and underperform reasoning-tuned 150M+ baselines on BRIGHT (CITATION) by several nDCG@10 points; no public reasoning-tuned ColBERT exists at edge scale. We introduce SmallReason-ColBERT, a 32M late-interaction retriever that closes much of this gap with three ingredients: a varied-length contrastive warmup on ReasonIR-VL, a hard-negative distillation polish on merged ReasonIR-HQ and BGE-Reasoner data, and a single-layer per-query-token importance head trained on top of the frozen base. The head is trained with an un-normalised weighted MaxSim score and evaluated with its length-normalised form. In a controlled re-training, replacing this training objective with the symmetric normalised score causes the loss to stall and costs 3.59 nDCG@10. The full recipe reaches 21.41 mean nDCG@10 on BRIGHT, within 1.21 of the 150M Reason-ModernColBERT (22.62) and above all ≤ 33M ColBERTs we evaluate. Through ablations on capacity, initialisation, and score variants, we further show that the learned head outperforms fixed IDF weighting and that simply thresholding the learned gates is harmful.

Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a standard format for evaluating large language models (LLMs), yet the popularity of answer options can confound evaluation. Modern LLMs systematically prefer popular but incorrect options over less popular correct ones, a vulnerability we call popularity bias. This pattern aligns with confidence miscalibration: model confidence remains high even as accuracy collapses for popular options. To systematically isolate this phenomenon, we introduce PopMCQ, a benchmark with six controlled strategies that vary option popularity while keeping the correct answer fixed. In our most adversarial setting, where all distractors are more popular than the correct option, models choose popular but wrong answers 66% of the time. To mitigate this bias, we propose PopDebias, a lightweight inference-time correction that estimates and removes a popularity prior from model predictions. It requires no fine-tuning, is label-free at test time (using only a small calibration split for parameter fitting), and adds negligible computational cost. Experiments on 22 open-source LLMs (0.5B to 32B parameters) show consistent improvements, with accuracy gains up to 54.1 percentage points under strong popularity pressure.

Late-interaction vision-language retrievers represent each document page as many visual token embeddings and score queries with MaxSim. In systems such as ColPali, ColQwen, ColNomic, and Nemotron ColEmbed, the document embeddings are produced without seeing the query, so the same page is represented identically for a table lookup, a chart question, and a layout-sensitive evidence request. We introduce Argus, a family of query-conditioned late-interaction retrievers built on Qwen3.5-VL. Argus adds a region-aware Mixture-of-Experts module: the query encoder produces both retrieval embeddings and a compact context vector, the document page is pooled into spatial regions, and a query-aware router selects latent experts per region before MaxSim. The output remains a multi-vector index compatible with ColPali-style retrieval, but the document representation is now dependent on the query (i.e., 𝐃(q)). All Argus models use a 1024-dimensional retrieval head, compared with the 2560-dimensional and 4096-dimensional heads of recent state-of-the-art systems, and are trained on roughly 9% of the available public supervision rather than the full pool. The 9B model reaches 92.67 NDCG@5 on ViDoRe V1 and 86.0 NDCG@5 on the combined V1+V2 leaderboard, the highest reported value for an open late-interaction model on the combined leaderboard. Wrapped in a Qwen3.6-27B agentic retrieval pipeline on ViDoRe V3, Argus-9B further improves its NDCG@10 from 60.28 to 64.80 over public tasks, showing that the same retriever serves both as a strong standalone system and as a search primitive for iterative LLM agents.

Existing temporal QA benchmarks focus on simple fact-seeking queries from news corpora, while reasoning-intensive retrieval benchmarks lack temporal grounding. However, real-world information needs often require reasoning about temporal evolution and synthesizing evidence across time periods. We introduce TEMPO, the first benchmark combining temporal reasoning with reasoning-intensive retrieval across 13 domains. TEMPO features: (1) 1,730 complex queries requiring deep temporal reasoning such as tracking changes, identifying trends, or comparing cross-period evidence; (2) step-wise retrieval planning with 3,976 decomposed steps and gold documents mapped to each step for multi-hop evaluation; and (3) novel temporal metrics including Temporal Coverage@k and Temporal Precision@k measuring whether results span required time periods. Evaluation of 16 retrieval systems reveals substantial challenges: the best model (DiVeR) achieves only 32.0 NDCG@10 and 71.4% Temporal Coverage@10, demonstrating difficulty in retrieving temporally complete evidence. We believe TEMPO provides a challenging benchmark for improving temporal reasoning in retrieval and RAG systems.

The growing demand for corporate sustainability transparency, particularly under new regulations like the EU Taxonomy, necessitates precise data extraction from large, unstructured corporate reports, a task for which Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems require high-quality, domain-specific question-answering datasets. To address this, we introduce SustainableQA, a novel dataset and a scalable pipeline that generates comprehensive QA pairs from corporate sustainability and annual reports by integrating semantic chunk classification, a hybrid span extraction pipeline, and a specialized table-to-paragraph transformation. To ensure high quality, the generation is followed by a novel automated assessment and refinement pipeline that systematically validates each QA pair for faithfulness and relevance, repairing or discarding low-quality entries. This results in a final, robust dataset of over 195,000 diverse factoid and non-factoid QA pairs, whose effectiveness is demonstrated by initial fine-tuning experiments where a compact 8B parameter model outperforms much larger state-of-the-art models. These results demonstrate the potential of SustainableQA as a resource for developing and benchmarking advanced knowledge assistants capable of navigating complex sustainability compliance data

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly provide direct answers to user questions, raising concerns about reduced engagement in critical thinking and problem-solving. Hint generation offers an alternative by guiding users toward answers without revealing them, while hint evaluation assesses the quality of such guidance. Research in this area is hindered by fragmented datasets, inconsistent annotation formats, and evaluation tools that are often dataset-specific or unavailable. To address these challenges, we introduce HintEval, an open-source Python library for unified hint generation and evaluation. HintEval standardizes access to diverse hint datasets, supports answer-aware and answer-agnostic generation methods, and implements multiple evaluation metrics within a shared data model. The toolkit enables reproducible experimentation, cross-dataset analysis, and multi-dimensional evaluation with minimal engineering effort. We further demonstrate its utility through human studies in which participants assess generated hints and use them to answer questions, showing that hints can effectively support users in reaching correct answers. HintEval is accompanied by comprehensive documentation, an executable Google Colab notebook for rapid experimentation, and a demonstration video. By promoting consistent evaluation practices and lowering barriers to entry, it facilitates systematic research on hint-based question answering (QA) in NLP and IR.

Estimating question difficulty is a critical component in evaluating and improving large language models (LLMs) for question answering (QA). Existing approaches often rely on readability formulas, retrieval-based signals, or popularity statistics, which may not fully capture the reasoning challenges posed to modern LLMs. In this paper, we introduce Q-DAPS (Question Difficulty based on Answer Plausibility Scores) method, a novel approach that estimates question difficulty by computing the entropy of plausibility scores over candidate answers. We systematically evaluate Q-DAPS across four prominent QA datasets—TriviaQA, NQ, MuSiQue, and QASC—demonstrating that it consistently outperforms baselines. Moreover, Q-DAPS shows strong robustness across hyperparameter variations and question types. Extensive ablation studies further show that Q-DAPS remains robust across different plausibility estimation paradigms, model sizes, and realistic settings. Human evaluations further confirm strong alignment between Q-DAPS’s difficulty estimates and human judgments of question difficulty. Overall, Q-DAPS provides an interpretable, scalable, and bias-resilient approach to question difficulty estimation in modern QA systems.

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong potential for zero-shot document ranking, current listwise approaches face three critical limitations. First, context length constraints prevent processing many documents simultaneously. Second, sequential generation creates bottlenecks that cannot run in parallel. Third, ranking results depend heavily on initial document order, leading to inconsistent performance. We introduce BracketRank, a reasoning-driven competitive elimination framework that addresses these challenges through systematic group competition. Our method uses adaptive grouping to automatically optimise group sizes based on LLM context limits, reasoning-enhanced prompts that require explicit relevance explanations, and bracket-style elimination where documents compete through winner and loser brackets. This structure ensures every document has fair advancement opportunities regardless of initial positioning while allowing for parallel processing across competition stages. We evaluate BracketRank on TREC DL 19, TREC DL 20, and eight BEIR benchmark datasets. Results show that BracketRank achieves 77.90 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 19 and 75.85 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 20, outperforming RankGPT and other state-of-the-art methods. On BEIR datasets, BracketRank reaches 54.66 average NDCG@10, demonstrating robust performance across diverse domains.

Time plays a critical role in how information is generated, retrieved, and interpreted. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of Temporal Question Answering (TQA), a research area that focuses on answering questions involving temporal constraints or context. As time-stamped content from sources like news articles, web archives, and knowledge bases continues to grow, TQA systems must address challenges such as detecting temporal intent, normalizing time expressions, ordering events, and reasoning over evolving or ambiguous facts. We organize existing work through a unified perspective that captures the interaction between corpus temporality, question temporality, and model capabilities, enabling a systematic comparison of datasets, tasks, and approaches. We review recent advances in TQA enabled by neural architectures, especially transformer-based models and Large Language Models (LLMs), highlighting progress in temporal language modeling, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and temporal reasoning. We also discuss benchmark datasets and evaluation strategies designed to test temporal robustness, recency awareness, and generalization.

Building retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems often requires combining separate tools for retrieval, re-ranking, and generation, with incompatible data formats, evaluation pipelines, and deployment workflows. We present Rankify, an open-source Python toolkit that unifies these stages in a single modular framework. Rankify provides 42 benchmark datasets with pre-retrieved documents and pre-built indices, 15 retrievers (sparse, dense, and reasoning-augmented), and 24 re-ranking models spanning 41 pointwise, pairwise, and listwise variants. It also supports 6 RAG strategies across four inference backends (Hugging Face, vLLM, LiteLLM, and OpenAI), enabling consistent experimentation from local models to hosted APIs. A unified pipeline interface allows users to compose retrieve–rerank–generate workflows in a few lines of code, while an agentic assistant (RankifyAgent), aREST server (RankifyServer), and an interactive web playground support deployment and non-programmatic exploration. Across 200+ configurations on QA and BEIR/TREC benchmarks with six generator LLMs, re-ranking consistently improves downstream performance, yielding gains of 5–15 points in Exact Match and up to 8.5 points in RAGAS context precision across diverse retriever–generator combinations. Rankify is released under the Apache-2.0 License.

Digital education has gained popularity in the last decade, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. With the improving capabilities of large language models to reason and communicate with users, envisioning intelligent tutoring systems that can facilitate self-learning is not very far-fetched. One integral component to fulfill this vision is the ability to give accurate and effective feedback via hints to scaffold the learning process. In this survey article, we present a comprehensive review of prior research on hint generation, aiming to bridge the gap between research in education and cognitive science, and research in AI and Natural Language Processing. Informed by our findings, we propose a formal definition of the hint generation task, and discuss the roadmap of building an effective hint generation system aligned with the formal definition, including open challenges, future directions and ethical considerations.

Legal judgment prediction (LJP) is an essential task for legal AI, aiming at predicting judgments based on the facts of a case. Legal judgments can involve multiple law articles and charges. Although recent methods in LJP have made notable progress, most are constrained to single-task settings (e.g., only predicting charges) or single-label settings (e.g., not accommodating cases with multiple charges), diverging from the complexities of real-world scenarios. In this paper, we address the challenge of predicting relevant law articles and charges within the framework of legal judgment prediction, treating it as a multi-task and multi-label text classification problem. We introduce a knowledge-enhanced approach, called K-LJP, that incorporates (I) ”label-level knowledge” (such as definitions and relationships among labels) to enhance the representation of case facts for each task, and (ii) ”task-level knowledge” (such as the alignment between law articles and corresponding charges) to improve task synergy. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate our method’s effectiveness in comparison to state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models have drawn considerable attention in modern open-domain question answering. The effectiveness of RAG depends on the quality of the top retrieved documents. However, conventional retrieval methods sometimes fail to rank the most relevant documents at the top. In this paper, we introduce ASRANK, a new re-ranking method based on scoring retrieved documents using zero-shot answer scent which relies on a pre-trained large language model to compute the likelihood of the document-derived answers aligning with the answer scent. Our approach demonstrates marked improvements across several datasets, including NQ, TriviaQA, WebQA, ArchivalQA, HotpotQA, and Entity Questions. Notably, ASRANK increases Top-1 retrieval accuracy on NQ from 19.2% to 46.5% for MSS and 22.1% to 47.3% for BM25. It also shows strong retrieval performance on several datasets compared to state-of-the-art methods (47.3 Top-1 by ASRANK vs 35.4 by UPR by BM25).

Legal claims refer to the plaintiff’s demands in a case and are essential to guiding judicial reasoning and case resolution. While many works have focused on improving the efficiency of legal professionals, the research on helping non-professionals (e.g., plaintiffs) remains unexplored. This paper explores the problem of legal claim generation based on the given case’s facts. First, we construct ClaimGen-CN, the first dataset for Chinese legal claim generation task, from various real-world legal disputes. Additionally, we design an evaluation metric tailored for assessing the generated claims, which encompasses two essential dimensions: factuality and clarity. Building on this, we conduct a comprehensive zero-shot evaluation of state-of-the-art general and legal-domain large language models. Our findings highlight the limitations of the current models in factual precision and expressive clarity, pointing to the need for more targeted development in this domain. To encourage further exploration of this important task, we will make the dataset publicly available.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed listwise document reranking by enabling global reasoning over candidate sets, yet single models often struggle to balance fine-grained relevance scoring with holistic cross-document analysis. We propose DeepAgentRank (DeAR), an open-source framework that decouples these tasks through a dual-stage approach, achieving superior accuracy and interpretability. In Stage 1, we distill token-level relevance signals from a frozen 13B LLaMA teacher into a compact 3, 8B student model using a hybrid of cross-entropy, RankNet, and KL divergence losses, ensuring robust pointwise scoring. In Stage 2, we attach a second LoRA adapter and fine-tune on 20K GPT-4o-generated chain-of-thought permutations, enabling listwise reasoning with natural-language justifications. Evaluated on TREC-DL19/20, eight BEIR datasets, and NovelEval-2306, DeAR surpasses open-source baselines by +5.1 nDCG@5 on DL20 and achieves 90.97 nDCG@10 on NovelEval, outperforming GPT-4 by +3.09. Without fine-tuning on Wikipedia, DeAR also excels in open-domain QA, achieving 54.29 Top-1 accuracy on Natural Questions, surpassing baselines like MonoT5, UPR, and RankGPT. Ablations confirm that dual-loss distillation ensures stable calibration, making DeAR a highly effective and interpretable solution for modern reranking systems.

In this work, we present a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art reranking methods, encompassing large language model (LLM)-based, lightweight contextual, and zero-shot approaches, with respect to their performance in information retrieval tasks. We evaluate in total 22 methods, including 40 variants (depending on used LLM) across several established benchmarks, including TREC DL19, DL20, and BEIR, as well as a novel dataset designed to test queries unseen by pretrained models. Our primary goal is to determine, through controlled and fair comparisons, whether a performance disparity exists between LLM-based rerankers and their lightweight counterparts, particularly on novel queries, and to elucidate the underlying causes of any observed differences. To disentangle confounding factors, we analyse the effects of training data overlap, model architecture, and computational efficiency on reranking performance. Our findings indicate that while LLM-based rerankers demonstrate superior performance on familiar queries, their generalisation ability to novel queries varies, with lightweight models offering comparable efficiency. We further identify that the novelty of queries significantly impacts reranking effectiveness, highlighting limitations in existing approaches.

Large Language Models (LLMs) encapsulate a surprising amount of factual world knowledge. However, their performance on temporal questions and historical knowledge is limited because they often cannot understand temporal scope and orientation or neglect the temporal aspect altogether.In this study, we aim to measure precisely how robust LLMs are for question answering based on their ability to process temporal information and perform tasks requiring temporal reasoning and temporal factual knowledge. Specifically, we design eight time-sensitiverobustness tests for factual information to check the sensitivity of six popular LLMs in the zero-shot setting.Overall, we find LLMs lacking temporal robustness, especially to temporal reformulations and the use of different granularities of temporal references. We show how a selection of these eight tests can be used automatically to judge a model’s temporal robustness for user questions on the fly. Finally, we apply the findings of this study to improve the temporal QA performance by up to 55%.

Video Question-Answer-Distractors (QADs) show promising values for assessing the performance of systems in perceiving and comprehending multimedia content. Given the significant cost and labor demands of manual annotation, existing large-scale Video QADs benchmarks are typically generated automatically using video captions. Since video captions are incomplete representations of visual content and susceptible to error propagation, direct generation of QADs from video is crucial. This work first leverages a large vision-language model for video QADs generation. To enhance the consistency and diversity of the generated QADs, we propose utilizing temporal motion to describe the video objects. In addition, We design a selection mechanism that chooses diverse temporal object motions to generate diverse QADs focusing on different objects and interactions, maximizing overall semantic uncertainty for a given video. Evaluation on the NExT-QA and Perception Test benchmarks demonstrates that the proposed approach significantly improves both the consistency and diversity of QADs generated by a range of large vision-language models, thus highlighting its effectiveness and generalizability.

Medical Dialogue Systems (MDSs) have emerged as promising tools for automated healthcare support through patient-agent interactions. Previous efforts typically relied on an idealized assumption — patients can accurately report symptoms aligned with their actual health conditions. However, in reality, patients often misreport their symptoms, due to cognitive limitations, emotional factors, etc. Overlooking patient misreports can significantly compromise the diagnostic accuracy of MDSs. To address this critical issue, we emphasize the importance of enabling MDSs to “listen to patients” by tackling two key challenges: how to detect misreport and mitigate misreport effectively. In this work, we propose PaMis, a novel framework that can detect patient misreports based on calculating the structural entropy of the dialogue entity graph, and mitigate them through generating controlled clarifying questions. Our experimental results demonstrate that PaMis effectively enhances MDSs reliability by effectively addressing patient misreports during the medical response generation process.

Information retrieval in specialized domains (e.g., legal and medical) faces challenges in aligning user queries, often expressed in colloquial language, with highly structured, terminology-rich documents. This discrepancy creates a distribution gap in the text representation. Recent methods aim to enhance queries by generating intermediary elements (e.g., keywords, pseudo-documents) before performing retrieval with large language models (LLMs). However, by treating LLMs and retrievers separately, these approaches risk producing unreliable or irrelevant intermediaries, which can significantly degrade retrieval performance. To address this issue, we propose CoEvo, an alternating optimization framework that facilitates the coevolution of LLMs and retrieval models. CoEvo operates through two key steps: L-step directs the LLM in generating intermediaries by leveraging an archive of historical examples known to enhance retrieval. R-step trains the retriever using contrastive learning on the intermediaries produced by the LLM. Finally, we evaluate and flexibly leverage content generated by the LLM to amplify the effectiveness of coevolution. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in retrieval performance across both legal and medical domains.

We introduce ComplexTempQA,a large-scale dataset consisting of over 100 million question-answer pairs designed to tackle the challenges in temporal question answering. ComplexTempQA significantly surpasses existing benchmarks in scale and scope. Utilizing Wikipedia and Wikidata, the dataset covers questions spanning over two decades and offers an unmatched scale. We introduce a new taxonomy that categorizes questions as attributes, comparisons, and counting questions, revolving around events, entities, and time periods, respectively. A standout feature of ComplexTempQA is the high complexity of its questions, which demand reasoning capabilities for answering such as across-time comparison, temporal aggregation, and multi-hop reasoning involving temporal event ordering and entity recognition. Additionally, each question is accompanied by detailed metadata, including specific time scopes, allowing for comprehensive evaluation of temporal reasoning abilities of large language models.

This paper presents DynRank, a novel framework for enhancing passage retrieval in open-domain question-answering systems through dynamic zero-shot question classification. Traditional approaches rely on static prompts and pre-defined templates, which may limit model adaptability across different questions and contexts. In contrast, DynRank introduces a dynamic prompting mechanism, leveraging a pre-trained question classification model that categorizes questions into fine-grained types. Based on these classifications, contextually relevant prompts are generated, enabling more effective passage retrieval. We integrate DynRank into existing retrieval frameworks and conduct extensive experiments on multiple QA benchmark datasets.

Multiple-choice visual question answering (MC VQA) requires an answer picked from a list of distractors, based on a question and an image. This research has attracted wide interest from the fields of visual question answering, visual question generation, and visual distractor generation. However, these fields still stay in their own territories, and how to jointly generate meaningful questions, correct answers, and challenging distractors remains unexplored. In this paper, we introduce a novel task, Visual Question-Answer-Distractors Generation (VQADG), which can bridge this research gap as well as take as a cornerstone to promote existing VQA models. Specific to the VQADG task, we present a novel framework consisting of a vision-and-language model to encode the given image and generate QADs jointly, and contrastive learning to ensure the consistency of the generated question, answer, and distractors. Empirical evaluations on the benchmark dataset validate the performance of our model in the VQADG task.

Detecting and answering ambiguous questions has been a challenging task in open-domain question answering. Ambiguous questions have different answers depending on their interpretation and can take diverse forms. Temporally ambiguous questions are one of the most common types of such questions. In this paper, we introduce TEMPAMBIQA, a manually annotated temporally ambiguous QA dataset consisting of 8,162 open-domain questions derived from existing datasets. Our annotations focus on capturing temporal ambiguity to study the task of detecting temporally ambiguous questions. We propose a novel approach by using diverse search strategies based on disambiguate versions of the questions. We also introduce and test non-search, competitive baselines for detecting temporal ambiguity using zero-shot and few-shot approaches.

Automatic Question Answering (QA) systems rely on contextual information to provide accurate answers. Commonly, contexts are prepared through either retrieval-based or generation-based methods. The former involves retrieving relevant documents from a corpus like Wikipedia, whereas the latter uses generative models such as Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate the context. In this paper, we introduce a novel context preparation approach called HINTQA, which employs Automatic Hint Generation (HG) techniques. Unlike traditional methods, HINTQA prompts LLMs to produce hints about potential answers for the question rather than generating relevant context. We evaluate our approach across three QA datasets including TriviaQA, Natural Questions, and Web Questions, examining how the number and order of hints impact performance. Our findings show that the HINTQA surpasses both retrieval-based and generation-based approaches. We demonstrate that hints enhance the accuracy of answers more than retrieved and generated contexts.

Temporal validity is an important property of text that has many downstream applications, such as recommender systems, conversational AI, and user status tracking. Existing benchmarking tasks often require models to identify the temporal validity duration of a single statement. However, many data sources contain additional context, such as successive sentences in a story or posts on a social media profile. This context may alter the duration for which the originally collected statement is expected to be valid. We propose Temporal Validity Change Prediction, a natural language processing task benchmarking the capability of machine learning models to detect context statements that induce such change. We create a dataset consisting of temporal target statements sourced from Twitter and crowdsource corresponding context statements. We then benchmark a set of transformer-based language models on our dataset. Finally, we experiment with a multitasking approach to improve the state-of-the-art performance.

In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful tool for enhancing large language models (LLMs) in addressing downstream tasks. In this paper, we explore the vital task of example selection in ICL by mimicking the human learning process. We propose a Chain-of-Quizzes (CoQ) framework inspired by educational theories such as Bruner’s Spiral Learning and Mastery Learning theory. Specifically, our framework employs the LLMs to answer the quiz (question in the example) to sift ‘good’ examples, combines these examples iteratively with the increasing complexity, and utilizes a final exam to gauge the combined example chains. Our extensive experiments on diverse reasoning datasets show the proposed approach outperforms baseline models. These findings underscore the framework’s potential for future research.

Multiple-choice visual question answering (VQA) is to automatically choose a correct answer from a set of choices after reading an image. Existing efforts have been devoted to a separate generation of an image-related question, a correct answer, or challenge distractors. By contrast, we turn to a holistic generation and optimization of questions, answers, and distractors (QADs) in this study. This integrated generation strategy eliminates the need for human curation and guarantees information consistency. Furthermore, we first propose to put the spotlight on different image regions to diversify QADs. Accordingly, a novel framework ReBo is formulated in this paper. ReBo cyclically generates each QAD based on a recurrent multimodal encoder, and each generation is focusing on a different area of the image compared to those already concerned by the previously generated QADs. In addition to traditional VQA comparisons with state-of-the-art approaches, we also validate the capability of ReBo in generating augmented data to benefit VQA models.

Inquiry conversation is a common form of conversation that aims to complete the investigation (e.g., court hearing, medical consultation and police interrogation) during which a series of focus shifts occurs. While many models have been proposed to generate a smooth response to a given conversation history, neglecting the focus can limit performance in inquiry conversation where the order of the focuses plays there a key role. In this paper, we investigate the problem of response generation in inquiry conversation by taking the focus into consideration. We propose a novel Focus-aware Response Generation (FRG) method by jointly optimizing a multi-level encoder and a set of focal decoders to generate several candidate responses that correspond to different focuses. Additionally, a focus ranking module is proposed to predict the next focus and rank the candidate responses. Experiments on two orthogonal inquiry conversation datasets (judicial, medical domain) demonstrate that our method generates results significantly better in automatic metrics and human evaluation compared to the state-of-the-art approaches.

This research addresses the challenges of Cross-Lingual Summarization (CLS) in low-resource scenarios and over imbalanced multilingual data. Existing CLS studies mostly resort to pipeline frameworks or multi-task methods in bilingual settings. However, they ignore the data imbalance in multilingual scenarios and do not utilize the high-resource monolingual summarization data. In this paper, we propose the Aligned CROSs-lingual Summarization (ACROSS) model to tackle these issues. Our framework aligns low-resource cross-lingual data with high-resource monolingual data via contrastive and consistency loss, which help enrich low-resource information for high-quality summaries. In addition, we introduce a data augmentation method that can select informative monolingual sentences, which facilitates a deep exploration of high-resource information and introduce new information for low-resource languages. Experiments on the CrossSum dataset show that ACROSS outperforms baseline models and obtains consistently dominant performance on 45 language pairs.

Temporal reasoning represents a vital component of human communication and understanding, yet remains an underexplored area within the context of Large Language Models (LLMs). Despite LLMs demonstrating significant proficiency in a range of tasks, a comprehensive, large-scale analysis of their temporal reasoning capabilities is missing. Our paper addresses this gap, presenting the first extensive benchmarking of LLMs on temporal reasoning tasks. We critically evaluate 8 different LLMs across 6 datasets using 3 distinct prompting strategies. Additionally, we broaden the scope of our evaluation by including in our analysis 2 Code Generation LMs. Beyond broad benchmarking of models and prompts, we also conduct a fine-grained investigation of performance across different categories of temporal tasks. We further analyze the LLMs on varying temporal aspects, offering insights into their proficiency in understanding and predicting the continuity, sequence, and progression of events over time. Our findings reveal a nuanced depiction of the capabilities and limitations of the models within temporal reasoning, offering a comprehensive reference for future research in this pivotal domain.

As an important application of Artificial Intelligence, legal intelligence has recently attracted the attention of many researchers. Previous works investigated diverse issues like predicting crimes, predicting outcomes of judicial debates, or extracting information/knowledge from various kinds of legal documents. Although many advances have been made, the research on supporting prediction of court judgments remains relatively scarce, while the lack of large-scale data resources limits the development of this research.In this paper, we present a novel, large-size Court Debate Dataset (CDD), which includes 30,481 court cases, totaling 1,144,425 utterances. CDD contains real-world conversations involving judges, plaintiffs and defendants in court trials. To construct this dataset we have invited experienced judges to design appropriate labels for data records. We then asked law school students to provide annotations based on the defined labels. The dataset can be applied to several downstream tasks, such as text summarization, dialogue generation, text classification, etc. We introduce the details of the different tasks in the rapidly developing field of legal intelligence, the research of which can be fostered thanks to our dataset, and we provide the corresponding benchmark performance.

Keyword extraction is an integral task for many downstream problems like clustering, recommendation, search and classification. Development and evaluation of keyword extraction techniques require an exhaustive dataset; however, currently, the community lacks large-scale multi-lingual datasets. In this paper, we present MAKED, a large-scale multi-lingual keyword extraction dataset comprising of 540K+ news articles from British Broadcasting Corporation News (BBC News) spanning 20 languages. It is the first keyword extraction dataset for 11 of these 20 languages. The quality of the dataset is examined by experimentation with several baselines. We believe that the proposed dataset will help advance the field of automatic keyword extraction given its size, diversity in terms of languages used, topics covered and time periods as well as its focus on under-studied languages.

Archive collections are nowadays mostly available through search engines interfaces, which allow a user to retrieve documents by issuing queries. The study of these collections may be, however, impaired by some aspects of search engines, such as the overwhelming number of documents returned or the lack of contextual knowledge provided. New methods that could work independently or in combination with search engines are then required to access these collections. In this position paper, we propose to extend TimeLine Summarization (TLS) methods on archive collections to assist in their studies. We provide an overview of existing TLS methods and we describe a conceptual framework for an Archive TimeLine Summarization (ATLS) system, which aims to generate informative, readable and interpretable timelines.

Les modèles de langues pré-entraînés connaissent un très grand succès en TAL, en particulier dans les situations où l’on dispose de suffisamment de données d’entraînement. Cependant, il reste difficile d’obtenir des résultats similaires dans des environnements multilingues avec peu de données d’entraînement, en particulier dans des domaines spécialisés tels que la surveillance des épidémies. Dans cet article, nous explorons plusieurs hypothèses concernant les facteurs qui pourraient avoir une influence sur les performances d’un système d’extraction d’événements épidémiologiques dans un scénario multilingue à faibles ressources : le type de modèle pré-entraîné, la qualité du tokenizer ainsi que les caractéristiques des entités à extraire. Nous proposons une analyse exhaustive de ces facteurs et observons une corrélation importante, quoique variable ; entre ces caractéristiques et les performances observées sur la base d’une tâche de veille épidémiologique multilingue à faibles ressources. Nous proposons aussi d’adapter les modèles de langues à cette tâche en étendant le vocabulaire du tokenizer pré-entraîné avec les entités continues, qui sont des entités qui ont été divisées en plusieurs sous-mots. Suite à cette adaptation, nous observons une amélioration notable des performances pour la plupart des modèles et des langues évalués.

Current Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs (KGQA) task mainly focuses on performing answer reasoning upon KGs with binary facts. However, it neglects the n-ary facts, which contain more than two entities. In this work, we highlight a more challenging but under-explored task: n-ary KGQA, i.e., answering n-ary facts questions upon n-ary KGs. Nevertheless, the multi-hop reasoning framework popular in binary KGQA task is not directly applicable on n-ary KGQA. We propose two feasible improvements: 1) upgrade the basic reasoning unit from entity or relation to fact, and 2) upgrade the reasoning structure from chain to tree. Therefore, we propose a novel fact-tree reasoning framework, FacTree, which integrates the above two upgrades. FacTree transforms the question into a fact tree and performs iterative fact reasoning on the fact tree to infer the correct answer. Experimental results on the n-ary KGQA dataset we constructed and two binary KGQA benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of FacTree compared with state-of-the-art methods.

Multimodal Summarization (MS) has attracted research interest in the past few years due to the ease with which users perceive multimodal summaries. It is important for MS models to consider the topic a given target content belongs to. In the current paper, we propose a topic-aware MS system which performs two tasks simultaneously: differentiating the images into “on-topic” and “off-topic” categories and further utilizing the “on-topic” images to generate multimodal summaries. The hypothesis is that, the proposed topic similarity classifier will help in generating better multimodal summary by focusing on important components of images and text which are specific to a particular topic. To develop the topic similarity classifier, we have augmented the existing popular MS data set, MSMO, with similar “on-topic” and dissimilar “off-topic” images for each sample. Our experimental results establish that the focus on “on-topic” features helps in generating topic-aware multimodal summaries, which outperforms the state of the art approach by 1.7 % in ROUGE-L metric.

Although automatic text summarization (ATS) has been researched for several decades, the application of graph neural networks (GNNs) to this task started relatively recently. In this survey we provide an overview on the rapidly evolving approach of using GNNs for the task of automatic text summarization. In particular we provide detailed information on the functionality of GNNs in the context of ATS, and a comprehensive overview of models utilizing this approach.

Humorous texts can be of different forms such as punchlines, puns, or funny stories. Existing humor classification systems have been dealing with such diverse forms by treating them independently. In this paper, we argue that different forms of humor share a common background either in terms of vocabulary or constructs. As a consequence, it is likely that classification performance can be improved by jointly tackling different humor types. Hence, we design a shared-private multitask architecture following a transfer learning paradigm and perform experiments over four gold standard datasets. Empirical results steadily confirm our hypothesis by demonstrating statistically-significant improvements over baselines and accounting for new state-of-the-art figures for two datasets.

Knowledge graphs are essential for numerous downstream natural language processing applications, but are typically incomplete with many facts missing. This results in research efforts on multi-hop reasoning task, which can be formulated as a search process and current models typically perform short distance reasoning. However, the long-distance reasoning is also vital with the ability to connect the superficially unrelated entities. To the best of our knowledge, there lacks a general framework that approaches multi-hop reasoning in mixed long-short distance reasoning scenarios. We argue that there are two key issues for a general multi-hop reasoning model: i) where to go, and ii) when to stop. Therefore, we propose a general model which resolves the issues with three modules: 1) the local-global knowledge module to estimate the possible paths, 2) the differentiated action dropout module to explore a diverse set of paths, and 3) the adaptive stopping search module to avoid over searching. The comprehensive results on three datasets demonstrate the superiority of our model with significant improvements against baselines in both short and long distance reasoning scenarios.

In this paper, we address a novel task, Multiple TimeLine Summarization (MTLS), which extends the flexibility and versatility of Time-Line Summarization (TLS). Given any collection of time-stamped news articles, MTLS automatically discovers important yet different stories and generates a corresponding time-line for each story. To achieve this, we propose a novel unsupervised summarization framework based on two-stage affinity propagation. We also introduce a quantitative evaluation measure for MTLS based on previousTLS evaluation methods. Experimental results show that our MTLS framework demonstrates high effectiveness and MTLS task can give bet-ter results than TLS.

The spread of biased news and its consumption by the readers has become a considerable issue. Researchers from multiple domains including social science and media studies have made efforts to mitigate this media bias issue. Specifically, various techniques ranging from natural language processing to machine learning have been used to help determine news bias automatically. However, due to the lack of publicly available datasets in this field, especially ones containing labels concerning bias on a fine-grained level (e.g., on sentence level), it is still challenging to develop methods for effectively identifying bias embedded in new articles. In this paper, we propose a novel news bias dataset which facilitates the development and evaluation of approaches for detecting subtle bias in news articles and for understanding the characteristics of biased sentences. Our dataset consists of 966 sentences from 46 English-language news articles covering 4 different events and contains labels concerning bias on the sentence level. For scalability reasons, the labels were obtained based on crowd-sourcing. Our dataset can be used for analyzing news bias, as well as for developing and evaluating methods for news bias detection. It can also serve as resource for related researches including ones focusing on fake news detection.

Languages change over time and, thanks to the abundance of digital corpora, their evolutionary analysis using computational techniques has recently gained much research attention. In this paper, we focus on creating a dataset to support investigating the similarity in evolution between different languages. We look in particular into the similarities and differences between the use of corresponding words across time in English and French, two languages from different linguistic families yet with shared syntax and close contact. For this we select a set of cognates in both languages and study their frequency changes and correlations over time. We propose a new dataset for computational approaches of synchronized diachronic investigation of language pairs, and subsequently show novel findings stemming from the cognate-focused diachronic comparison of the two chosen languages. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first in the literature to use computational approaches and large data to make a cross-language diachronic analysis.

In this paper, we approach the multilingual text classification task in the context of the epidemiological field. Multilingual text classification models tend to perform differently across different languages (low- or high-resourced), more particularly when the dataset is highly imbalanced, which is the case for epidemiological datasets. We conduct a comparative study of different machine and deep learning text classification models using a dataset comprising news articles related to epidemic outbreaks from six languages, four low-resourced and two high-resourced, in order to analyze the influence of the nature of the language, the structure of the document, and the size of the data. Our findings indicate that the performance of the models based on fine-tuned language models exceeds by more than 50% the chosen baseline models that include a specialized epidemiological news surveillance system and several machine learning models. Also, low-resource languages are highly influenced not only by the typology of the languages on which the models have been pre-trained or/and fine-tuned but also by their size. Furthermore, we discover that the beginning and the end of documents provide the most salient features for this task and, as expected, the performance of the models was proportionate to the training data size.

The distribution of most dialectal variants have not only spatial but also temporal patterns. Based on the ‘apparent time hypothesis’, much of dialect change is happening through younger speakers accepting innovations. Thus, synchronic diversity can be interpreted diachronically. With the assumption of the ‘contact effect’, i.e. contact possibility (contact and isolation) between speaker communities being responsible for language change, and the apparent time hypothesis, we aim to predict the usage of dialectal variants. In this paper we model the contact possibility based on two of the most important factors in sociolinguistics to be affecting language change: age and distance. The first steps of the approach involve modeling contact possibility using a logistic predictor, taking the age of respondents into account. We test the global, and the local role of age for variation where the local level means spatial subsets around each survey site, chosen based on k nearest neighbors. The prediction approach is tested on Swiss German syntactic survey data, featuring multiple respondents from different age cohorts at survey sites. The results show the relative success of the logistic prediction approach and the limitations of the method, therefore further proposals are made to develop the methodology.

Enabling a mechanism to understand a temporal story and predict its ending is an interesting issue that has attracted considerable attention, as in case of the ROC Story Cloze Task (SCT). In this paper, we develop a multi-attention-based neural network (MANN) with well-designed optimizations, like Highway Network, and concatenated features with embedding representations into the hierarchical neural network model. Considering the particulars of the specific task, we thoughtfully extend MANN with external knowledge resources, exceeding state-of-the-art results obviously. Furthermore, we develop a thorough understanding of our model through a careful hand analysis on a subset of the stories. We identify what traits of MANN contribute to its outperformance and how external knowledge is obtained in such an ending prediction task.

Recent years have witnessed significant increase in the number of large scale digital collections of archival documents such as news articles, books, etc. Typically, users access these collections through searching or browsing. In this paper we investigate another way of accessing temporal collections - across-time comparison, i.e., comparing query-relevant information at different periods in the past. We propose an interactive framework called HistoryComparator for contrastively analyzing concepts in archival document collections at different time periods.