When multiple normative frameworks yield equally valid answers, which framework should a language model select, and can it answer correctly within it? We formalize this as normative pluralism and study it in Islamic finance with a four-choice taxonomy that decomposes framework selection from within-framework correctness. The decomposition exposes a failure mode invisible to two-choice instruments, the stereotype trap: a model leans toward the culturally appropriate framework but produces factually wrong answers within it. Across twelve models, two languages, and fifty demographic signals, cultural cues redirect framework selection at severe cost: redirection and correctness are inversely coupled (r=−0.89 Arabic, r=−0.81 English). Under the strongest signal, large open-weight models reach 97% Islamic-frame selection, a result two-choice instruments would report as near-perfect alignment, yet 57-66% of those responses misquote the Islamic rule. We argue that cultural default bias is competence-conditioned routing: models default to the framework where they are most accurate, and the cues prescribed as mitigation expose the competence gap they were meant to correct.

Medical benchmarks are dominated by single-turn, multiple-choice clinical cases that poorly reflect real consultations. Practically, clinicians elicit evidence interactively, and patient communication varies widely. We introduce MEDROUNDSQA, a multi-turn diagnostic benchmark derived from 1,387 clinical cases across 17 specialties. Each case is converted into a structured 24-slot clinical record and then instantiated as controlled doctor–patient dual-agent dialogues under varying patient personas, with the underlying clinical content held fixed. We further classify cases by difficulty using model-based uncertainty to enable easy-to-hard analysis. Evaluations of fifteen LLM doctor agents show that (i) moving from a single-turn diagnosis on the standardized records to multi-turn consultations causes large degradations of roughly 13–39 points; (ii) more turns reliably improve question relevance, but diagnostic accuracy exhibits diminishing returns and typically plateaus after 6–12 turns; and (iii) patient persona differences can shift diagnosis accuracy by about 7–8 points from the lowest to highest education levels, highlighting equity risks that single-turn benchmarks miss.

English financial NLP has progressed rapidly through benchmarks for sentiment, document understanding, and financial question answering, while Arabic financial NLP remains comparatively under-explored despite strong practical demand for trustworthy finance and Islamic-finance assistants. We introduce SAHM, a document-grounded benchmark and instruction-tuning dataset for Arabic financial NLP and Shari’ah-compliant reasoning. SAHM contains 14,380 expert-verified instances spanning seven tasks: AAOIFI standards QA, fatwa-based QA/MCQ, accounting and business exams, financial sentiment analysis, extractive summarization, and event–cause reasoning, curated from authentic regulatory, juristic, and corporate sources. We evaluate 19 strong open and proprietary LLMs using task-specific metrics and rubric-based scoring for open-ended outputs, and find that Arabic fluency does not reliably translate to evidence-grounded financial reasoning: models are substantially stronger on recognition-style tasks than on generation and causal reasoning, with the largest gaps on event–cause reasoning. We release the benchmark, evaluation framework, and an instruction-tuned model to support future research on trustworthy Arabic financial NLP.

Cross-architecture GPU code transpilation is essential for unlocking low-level hardware portability, yet no scalable solution exists. We introduce CASS, the first dataset and model suite for source- and assembly-level GPU translation (CUDA ↔ HIP, SASS ↔ RDNA3). CASS contains 60k verified host-device code pairs, enabling learning-based translation across both ISA and runtime boundaries. We generate each sample using our automated pipeline that scrapes, translates, compiles, and aligns GPU programs across vendor stacks. Leveraging CASS, we train a suite of domain-specific translation models that achieve 88.2% accuracy on CUDA → HIP and 69.1% on SASS → RDNA3, outperforming commercial baselines including GPT-5.1, Claude-4.5, and Hipify by wide margins. Generated code matches native performance in 85% of cases, preserving both runtime and memory behavior. To support rigorous evaluation, we introduce CASS-Bench, a curated benchmark spanning 18 GPU domains with ground-truth execution. All data, models, and evaluation tools will be released as open source to support progress in GPU compiler tooling, binary compatibility, and LLM-guided code translation.

The rapid adoption of LLM-based agentic systems has produced a rich ecosystem of frameworks (smolagents, LangGraph, AutoGen, CAMEL, LlamaIndex, i.a.). Yet many existing benchmarks are model-centric: they fix the agentic setup and do not compare other system components. We argue that implementation decisions substantially impact performance, including choices such as topology, orchestration logic, and error handling. MASEval addresses this evaluation gap with a Python library that treats the entire agentic system as the unit of analysis. Important design decisions such as harness and context engineering are first-class citizens. MASEval helps practitioners identify the best implementation for their use case and researchers systematically study agentic systems, opening new avenues for principled system design. Through the first systematic system-level comparison across 3 benchmarks, 3 models, and 3 frameworks, we find that, across models of comparable cost and capability, framework choice matters as much as model choice. MASEval is available under the MIT licence at https://github.com/maseval/MASEval.

Recent years have witnessed a significant interest in developing large multi-modal models (LMMs) capable of performing various visual reasoning and understanding tasks. This has led to the introduction of multiple LMM benchmarks to evaluate LMMs on different tasks. However, most existing LMM evaluation benchmarks are predominantly English-centric. In this work, we develop a comprehensive LMM evaluation benchmark for the Arabic language to represent a large population of over 400 million speakers. The proposed benchmark, named CAMEL-Bench, comprises eight diverse domains and 38 sub-domains including, multi-image understanding, complex visual perception, handwritten document understanding, video understanding, medical imaging, plant diseases, and remote sensing-based land use understanding to evaluate broad scenario generalizability. Our CAMEL-Bench comprises around 29,036 questions that are filtered from a larger pool of samples, where the quality is manually verified by native speakers to ensure reliable model assessment. We conduct evaluations of both closed-source, including GPT-4 series, and open-source LMMs. Our analysis reveals the need for substantial improvement, especially among the bestopen-source models, with even the closed-source GPT-4o achieving an overall score of 62%. Our benchmark will be publicly released.

The hardware ecosystem is rapidly evolving, with increasing interest in translating low-level programs across different instruction set architectures (ISAs) in a quick, flexible, and correct way to enhance the portability and longevity of existing code. A particularly challenging class of this transpilation problem is translating between complex- (CISC) and reduced- (RISC) hardware architectures, due to fundamental differences in instruction complexity, memory models, and execution paradigms. In this work, we introduce GG (Guaranteed Guess), an ISA-centric transpilation pipeline that combines the translation power of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) with the rigor of established software testing constructs. Our method generates candidate translations using an LLM from one ISA to another, and embeds such translations within a software-testing framework to build quantifiable confidence in the translation. We evaluate our GG approach over two diverse datasets, enforce high code coverage (>98%) across unit tests, and achieve functional/semantic correctness of 99% on HumanEval programs and 49% on BringupBench programs, respectively. Further, we compare our approach to the state-of-the-art Rosetta 2 framework on Apple Silicon, showcasing 1.73× faster runtime performance, 1.47× better energy efficiency, and 2.41× better memory usage for our transpiled code, demonstrating the effectiveness of GG for real-world CISC-to-RISC translation tasks. We will open-source our codes, data, models, and benchmarks to establish a common foundation for ISA-level code translation research.

Step-by-step reasoning is crucial for solving complex visual tasks, yet existing approaches lack a comprehensive framework for evaluating this capability and do not emphasize step-wise problem-solving. To this end, we propose a comprehensive framework for advancing multi-step visual reasoning in large multimodal models (LMMs) through three key contributions. First, we introduce a Visual Reasoning Chain Benchmark, the most comprehensive benchmark for multi-step visual reasoning, covering eight diverse categories and over 4k reasoning steps. This enables rigorous evaluation of LMMs’ ability to reason accurately and interpretably across multiple steps. Second, we propose a fine-grained reasoning metric that evaluates correctness and logical coherence at each step, providing deeper insights beyond traditional accuracy metrics. Third, we introduce LlamaV-o1, a state-of-the-art multimodal reasoning model trained using a multi-step curriculum learning approach. LlamaV-o1 is optimized for structured, step-by-step reasoning and significantly outperforms existing open-source models. It surpasses Llava-CoT with a 3.8% absolute gain across six benchmarks, achieving an average score of 67.3 while being 5x faster during inference scaling. Our benchmark, model, and code is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-oryx/LlamaV-o1.

With the growing adoption of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in document processing, robust text recognition has become increasingly critical for knowledge extraction. While OCR (Optical Character Recognition) for English and other languages benefits from large datasets and well-established benchmarks, Arabic OCR faces unique challenges due to its cursive script, right-to-left text flow, and complex typographic and calligraphic features. We present KITAB-Bench, a comprehensive Arabic OCR benchmark that fills the gaps in current evaluation systems. Our benchmark comprises 8,809 samples across 9 major domains and 36 subdomains, encompassing diverse document types including handwritten text, structured tables, and specialized coverage of 21 chart types for business intelligence. Our findings show that modern vision language models (such as GPT-4o, Gemini, and Qwen) outperform traditional OCR approaches (such as EasyOCR, PaddleOCR, and Surya) by an average of 60% in the character error rate (CER). Furthermore, we highlight significant limitations of current Arabic OCR models, particularly in PDF-to-Markdown conversion, where the best model Gemini-2.0-Flash achieves only 65% accuracy. This underscores the challenges of accurately recognizing Arabic text, including issues with complex fonts, numeral recognition errors, word elongation, and table structure detection. This work establishes a rigorous evaluation framework that can drive improvements in Arabic document analysis methods and bridge the performance gap with English OCR technologies.