Uncertainty estimation (UE) enables LLM-powered systems to recognize when to abstain, yet existing research has predominantly focused on English. We present the first large-scale evaluation of UE methods across 22 languages, spanning high-, mid-, and low-resource settings. Using two human-curated Q A datasets, we compare open and closed box UE methods (nine in total) across different model sizes and architectures while eliciting long-form reasoning, avoiding LLM-as-a-judge and embedding-based scoring, which can introduce evaluation noise. We report three main actionable findings. First, we find that prompting models to reason in English while keeping questions in low-resource languages substantially improves UE performance, suggesting that comprehension of low-resource languages is largely intact, and that the reliability bottleneck lies in generation rather than understanding. Second, prompting models to reason in English closes the UE performance gap between low and high-resource languages, demonstrating that generation language matters more than the question language. Third, the choice of UE method should depend on model scale: at smaller scales, open-box probability-based methods outperform alternatives; at larger scales, closed-box self-verbalized uncertainty becomes superior. Finally, we provide an analysis of threshold selection for selective prediction, offering guidance on calibrating abstention in multilingual settings. We publish our code to support further research in multilingual UE. Our code available in Anonymous Github[https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Cross-and-Multilingual-Uncertainty-Estimation-7976/].

The growing use of large language models (LLMs) has increased the need for automatic evaluation systems, particularly to address the challenge of information hallucination. Although existing faithfulness evaluation approaches have shown promise, they are predominantly English-focused and often require expensive human-labeled training data for fine-tuning specialized models. As LLMs see increased adoption in multilingual contexts, there is a need for accurate faithfulness evaluators that can operate across languages without extensive labeled data. This paper presents STEMF (Self-Taught Evaluators for Multilingual Faithfulness), a framework that learns exclusively from synthetic multilingual data while leveraging cross-lingual transfer learning. Through experiments comparing language-specific and mixed-language fine-tuning approaches, we demonstrate a consistent relationship between an LLM’s general language capabilities and its performance in language-specific evaluation tasks. Our framework shows improvements over existing baselines, including state-of-the-art English evaluators and machine translation-based approaches.

As large language models are increasingly deployed across diverse real-world applications, extending automated evaluation beyond English has become a critical challenge. Existing evaluation approaches are predominantly English-focused, and adapting them to other languages is hindered by the scarcity and cost of human-annotated judgments in most languages. We introduce a decomposition-based evaluation framework built around a Universal Criteria Set (UCS). UCS consists of a shared, language-agnostic set of evaluation dimensions, producing an interpretable intermediate representation that supports cross-lingual transfer with minimal supervision. Experiments on multiple faithfulness tasks across languages and model backbones demonstrate consistent improvements over strong baselines without requiring target-language annotations.

Data annotation remains a central bottleneck in natural language processing, requiring human effort to obtain high-quality labels at scale. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a fast and cost-effective alternative, their reliability is highly instance-dependent: they perform well on simple inputs but often fail on examples requiring nuanced reasoning or contextual understanding. In this work, we address this challenge with QUORUM (QUality-Optimized Routing Using Multiple annotators), a budget-aware routing framework that dynamically assigns each instance to human or LLM annotators under a fixed annotation budget. Unlike prior approaches relying on model confidence or uncertainty estimates, QUORUM leverages feature-based signals to estimate instance difficulty and supports multiple annotations per instance, combining them through agreement-based rewards to improve reliability. We evaluate QUORUM across diverse closed- and open-ended annotation tasks in English and multilingual settings, and QUORUM improves annotation quality by up to 34.4% while reducing costs by 8.8% over competing methods. Code can be found at https://github.com/amazon-science/QUORUM.

Human annotation cost and time remain significant bottlenecks in Natural Language Processing (NLP), with test data annotation being particularly expensive due to the stringent requirement for low-error and high-quality labels necessary for reliable model evaluation. Traditional approaches require annotating entire test sets, leading to substantial resource requirements. Active Testing is a framework that selects the most informative test samples for annotation. Given a labeling budget, it aims to choose the subset that best estimates model performance while minimizing cost and human effort. In this work, we formalize Active Testing in NLP and we conduct an extensive benchmarking of existing approaches across 18 datasets and 4 embedding strategies spanning 4 different NLP tasks. The experiments show annotation reductions of up to 95%, with performance estimation accuracy difference from the full test set within 1%. Our analysis reveals variations in method effectiveness across different data characteristics and task types, with no single approach emerging as universally superior. Lastly, to address the limitation of requiring a predefined annotation budget in existing sample selection strategies, we introduce an adaptive stopping criterion that automatically determines the optimal number of samples. We release our code at https://github.com/amazon-science/NLPActiveTesting.

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for their safe and reliable deployment, particularly in critical applications where incorrect outputs can have serious consequences. Current UQ methods typically rely on querying the model multiple times using non-zero temperature sampling to generate diverse outputs for uncertainty estimation. However, the impact of selecting a given temperature parameter is understudied, and our analysis reveals that temperature plays a fundamental role in the quality of uncertainty estimates. The conventional approach of identifying optimal temperature values requires expensive hyperparameter optimization (HPO) that must be repeated for each new model-dataset combination. We propose Monte Carlo Temperature (MCT), a robust sampling strategy that eliminates the need for temperature calibration. Our analysis reveals that: 1) MCT provides more robust uncertainty estimates across a wide range of temperatures, 2) MCT improves the performance of UQ methods by replacing fixed-temperature strategies that do not rely on HPO, and 3) MCT achieves statistical parity with oracle temperatures, which represent the ideal outcome of a well-tuned but computationally expensive HPO process. These findings demonstrate that effective UQ can be achieved without the computational burden of temperature parameter calibration.