Arabic large language models must refuse harmful prompts without over-refusing benign or sensitive prompts, yet a single refusal rate hides this trade-off. We evaluate it using benign refusal B and harmful-prompt refusal H, where H measures refusal rather than harmful compliance. Across five Arabic-capable models and 130 runs on the full human-written AraSafe set, refusal-only supervised fine-tuning (SFT) collapses toward blanket refusal, whereas selected mixed-SFT configurations reach H≈90–93% at B=14–23%; four selected configurations exceed H=90% in all three runs, while Fanar does so in two of three. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and inference guards change B and H differently across models rather than acting as uniform upgrades. In a blinded 300-response audit, annotator binary-refusal agreement is 89.0% (𝜅=0.78); Qwen3Guard and Aya Expanse 32B reach 88.7% and 91.0% accuracy, respectively, with no conclusive paired difference. Selected SFT raises H on Arabizi for all five models, but none reaches 90%, showing only partial transfer from Modern Standard Arabic; overall, the results support model-specific operating-point selection: set a deployment target and retain only interventions that improve it.

Classical Arabic poetry generation requires simultaneously satisfying semantic, linguistic, and fine-grained prosodic constraints. Existing systems typically control broad poetic attributes but do not jointly model semantic intent, meter subform, and poem length. We present Shaer, a controllable Classical Arabic poetry generation framework jointly conditioned on natural-language descriptions, meter subforms, and target hemistich counts. To support this task, we construct an enriched corpus of 116,032 classical Arabic poems derived from Ashaar, containing normalized meter-subform labels and automatically generated, validated semantic descriptions. We then adapt Yehia-7B using QLoRA-based supervised fine-tuning with a completion-only objective. Our evaluation combines automatic assessment of base-meter conformity, requested-subform adherence, and length control with three LLM judges, blinded human evaluation, and memorization analysis. Shaer achieves 95.17% base-meter accuracy, 91.75% poem-level meter-subform accuracy, and 83.40% exact count accuracy. Relative to its untuned foundation model, these results represent gains of 68.68, 57.77, and 38.93 percentage points, respectively; Shaer also attains the highest base-meter accuracy among all evaluated systems. Multi-LLM evaluation and a blinded human assessment of top-ranked outputs further indicate competitive semantic and literary quality. Finally, analysis of all 3,481 test generations finds no exact copies from the training corpus or paired source poems. Code, models, and datasets are publicly available.

We present AraLingBench, a fully human annotated benchmark for evaluating the Arabic linguistic competence of large language mod- els (LLMs). The benchmark spans five core categories: grammar, morphology, spelling, reading comprehension, and syntax, through 150 expert designed multiple choice questions that directly assess structural language understanding. Evaluating 35 Arabic and bilingual LLMs reveals that current models demonstrate strong surface level proficiency but struggle with deeper grammatical and syntactic reasoning. AraLingBench highlights a persistent gap between high scores on knowledge-based benchmarks and true linguistic mastery, showing that many models succeed through memorization or pattern recognition rather than au- thentic comprehension. By isolating and measuring fundamental linguistic skills, AraLingBench provides a diagnostic framework for developing Arabic LLMs. The benchmark and evaluation code are available on Hugging Face and GitHub.