Personalized LLM assistants must recover sparse evidence from long conversation histories across queries of varying complexity. We introduce APDMem (Agent-controlled Progressive Disclosure Memory), a hierarchical long-term memory architecture that applies progressive disclosure to memory retrieval. Rather than relying on a flat memory store or fixed retrieval granularity, APDMem represents conversation history as four progressively detailed layers: thematic summaries, personalized key facts, turn-level evidence notes, and raw messages. At inference time, a controller applies progressive disclosure to the memory hierarchy: it first reads high-level summaries and drills into finer evidence only when needed. This creates an adaptive cost-fidelity trade-off: simple queries can terminate early, while complex temporal, multi-hop, or exact-evidence queries trigger deeper inspection. A note synthesizer converts retrieved evidence into a query-focused structure that consolidates facts, orders events, and flags contradictions before final answer generation. Experiments on LongMemEval show that APDMem achieves strong performance for long-context memory reasoning while accessing only 8% of the total conversations.

Legal documents have complex document layouts involving multiple nested sections, lengthy footnotes and further use specialized linguistic devices like intricate syntax and domain-specific vocabulary to ensure precision and authority. These inherent characteristics of legal documents make question answering challenging, and particularly so when the answer to the question spans several pages (i.e. requires long-context) and is required to be comprehensive (i.e. a long-form answer).In this paper, we address the challenges of long-context question answering in context of long-form answers given the idiosyncrasies of legal documents. We propose a question answering system that can (a) deconstruct domain-specific vocabulary for better retrieval from source documents, (b) parse complex document layouts while isolating sections and footnotes and linking them appropriately, (c) generate comprehensive answers using precise domain-specific vocabulary. We also introduce a coverage metric that classifies the performance into recall-based coverage categories allowing human users to evaluate the recall with ease. By leveraging the expertise of professionals from fields such as law and corporate tax, we curate a QA dataset. Through comprehensive experiments and ablation studies, we demonstrate the usability and merit of the proposed system.