The Anglocentric nature of scholarly communication has many implications, such as limiting publication, discoverability and access from other language communities (even for major languages); putting minoritized languages at risk in the academic domain; and excluding many from peer review. The OSCAIL project addresses these challenges by exploring how machine translation (MT) enhanced by large language model (LLM)–based technologies can support access to scientific knowledge. Outputs will include evaluation datasets, protocols and best practices for MT in scholarly communication, and a prototype integration of MT tools into Open Journal Systems, the world’s most widely used open-source scholarly publishing platform.

RAG systems are usually compared as complete pipelines, making it difficult to attribute improvements to individual components. We evaluate chunking, retrieval, fusion, and reranking through a full factorial design with paired component substitutions and equal context budgets. Across five benchmarks, chunking interacts with retrieval architecture, BM25 fusion changes direction by domain, and reranking is the only intervention we test that remains beneficial across nearly all upstream configurations. Claim-level transitions further show that similar net recall can conceal very different changes in visible evidence. These findings demonstrate that RAG components cannot be ranked independently and motivate interaction-aware evaluation instead of winner-take-all pipeline comparisons.