We introduce CUS-QA, a benchmark for evaluation of open-ended regional question answering that encompasses both textual and visual modalities. We also provide strong baselines using state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). Our dataset consists of manually curated questions and answers grounded in Wikipedia, created by native speakers from Czechia, Slovakia, and Ukraine, with accompanying English translations. It includes both purely textual questions and those requiring visual understanding. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs through prompting and add human judgments of answer correctness. Using these human evaluations, we analyze the reliability of existing automatic evaluation metrics. Our baseline results show that even the best open-weight LLMs achieve only over 40% accuracy on textual questions and below 30% on visual questions. LLM-based evaluation metrics show strong correlation with human judgment, while traditional string-overlap metrics perform surprisingly well due to the prevalence of named entities in answers.

Previous research shows that vision-language (VL) models struggle to understand fine-grained image details and tend to focus on the overall layout. Moreover, any weakness in English tends to be further amplified in the multilingual setting. To study that, we extend InpaintCOCO, an English dataset focused on fine-grained visual details, to 13 typologically diverse languages across five language families, creating MultiInpaintCOCO – a new multilingual benchmark of 953 minimal-pair examples. We further test several state-of-the-art models in multilingual multimodal retrieval, considering both light VL CLIP-like encoders and large language models. Our results show that performance degrades substantially for lower-resource languages, with the strongest predictor being the data resources available for the languages rather than typological similarity to English. In cross-lingual retrieval, most models exhibit a systematic bias toward English: when given a correct caption in a non-English language and an incorrect one in English, models preferentially select the English caption. This bias varies considerably across architectures. Among the tested models, Gemma 3 shows the strongest English preference while Qwen 3 is the least biased, despite both reaching similar monolingual accuracy across languages. The code is available at https://github.com/ufal/multi-inpaint-coco.

We present the joint CUNI and LMU submission to the MRL 2024 Shared Task on Multi-lingual Multi-task Information Retrieval.The shared task objective was to explore how we can deploy modern methods in NLP in multi-lingual low-resource settings, tested on two sub-tasks: Named-entity recognition and question answering.Our solutions to the subtasks are based on data acquisition and model adaptation.We compare the performance of our submitted systems with the translate-test approachwhich proved to be the most useful in the previous edition of the shared task.Our results show that using more data as well as fine-tuning recent multilingual pre-trained models leads to considerable improvements over the translate-test baseline.Our code is available at https://github.com/ufal/mrl2024-multilingual-ir-shared-task.