We identify a special group of token vectors inside large language models (LLMs) — which we term magnetic vectors — that organize the surrounding tokens by either attracting or repelling them. Particularly, tokens pointing the same way as an attracting magnet are elongated; tokens pointing the same way as a repelling magnet are compressed. Just as physical magnets pull or push away the iron filings around them, these vectors organize their surroundings through two opposing polarities. Moreover, we identify a statistically significant pattern in linguistic category where function words consistently act as repelling magnets in early layers, and we also find magnets consistently reorganize their polarities in unique ways deeper in the model. In a further case study we find this observation may unveil a deliberate, layer-wise organization in how LLMs process language.

This pattern is consistent across different LLM architectures, sizes, and layer configurations. It is also causally relevant. When the LLM is fine-tuned for a downstream task, the task-functional tokens emerge as magnets. E.g., in question answering, the answer-span tokens become uniquely repelling magnets in the final layer, geometrically carving the answer out of the surrounding context. Furthermore, removing early-layer repelling magnets devastates syntactic tasks (POS tagging accuracy drops from 91% to below 10%) while sparing semantic ones, and removing late-layer attracting magnets does the reverse. We believe this phenomenon warrants further investigation, as it opens the first probe-free path to understanding how language models geometrically organize linguistic computation across their layers.

Deep search agents that combine large language models with retrieval tools excel at complex, multi-hop queries. Yet, existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp rely on black-box web search APIs, facing key limitations. (1) Fairness: for agents, dynamic and opaque web APIs hinder reproducibility and fair comparisons across agents. (2) Disentanglement: for retrieval, the lack of a fixed document corpus makes it impossible to isolate retriever contributions from end-to-end search agent accuracy. We introduce BrowseComp-Plus, a benchmark derived from BrowseComp that employs a fixed, human-verified corpus, enabling controlled retrieval for deep search agents. BrowseComp-Plus clearly distinguishes agent performance: with a BM25 retriever, the open-source Search-R1 achieves 3.86% accuracy, while GPT-5 achieves 55.9%. Additionally, BrowseComp-Plus makes retrieval gains explicit: pairing GPT-5 with Qwen3-Embedding-8B retriever further improves accuracy to 70.1% while reducing search calls. Overall, BrowseComp-Plus provides a fair and disentangled testbed, advancing both deep search agent evaluation and retrieval research for agentic search. Code and data can be found at: https://texttron.github.io/BrowseComp-Plus/