Event linking associates event mentions in text with entries in a knowledge base (KB), or identifies them as out-of-KB events. Although existing methods use different architectures, candidate event acquisition can still be weakened by short ambiguous mentions, noisy arguments, and evidence that is unevenly useful for retrieval. We present MACE, a Multi-Agent Candidate Event acquisition method that refines event structure before linking. MACE uses evidence-specialized LLM agents to acquire time, location, participant, and event-type evidence, exposes intermediate queries to candidate-event lookup tools, and lets a coordinator revise the evidence set before final candidate construction. Experiments on two event linking benchmarks show that adding MACE to different event linking models consistently improves accuracy. These results show that MACE improves event linking through better candidate event acquisition without modifying the event linking model.

Predictive political question answering (QA), such as predicting how a political actor will vote, goes beyond factual lookup. External political resources offer rich historical evidence, but rarely contain the answer itself. Existing LLM augmentation methods, including actor-profile-based simulation and knowledge graph evidence injection, improve political reasoning but largely treat external resources as knowledge-based evidence, leaving prediction-relevant signals under-modeled. We identify two complementary signals for predictive political QA: actor stances that capture issue-specific preferences, and high-order structure signals that capture indirect dependencies among political actors. We propose PSL, a dual-view framework that converts semi-structured political records into inference-oriented evidence for LLMs. PSL extracts stance signals from question-relevant actor records in a semantic view, and learns structure-aware actor representations from an actor interaction graph in a vector view. Across three real-world datasets and multiple LLMs, PSL consistently outperforms baselines, with ablations confirming the complementary gains of stance and structure signals.

Knowledge Bases (KBs) play a key role in various applications. As two representative KB-related tasks, knowledge base completion (KBC) and knowledge base question answering (KBQA) are closely related and inherently complementary with each other. Thus, it will be beneficial to solve the task of joint KBC and KBQA to make them reinforce each other. However, existing studies usually rely on the small language model (SLM) to enhance them jointly, and the large language model (LLM)’s strong reasoning ability is ignored. In this paper, by combining the strengths of the LLM with the SLM, we propose a novel framework JCQL, which can make these two tasks enhance each other in an iterative manner. To make KBC enhance KBQA, we augment the LLM agent-based KBQA model’s reasoning paths by incorporating an SLM-trained KBC model as an action of the agent, alleviating the LLM’s hallucination and high computational costs issue in KBQA. To make KBQA enhance KBC, we incrementally fine-tune the KBC model by leveraging KBQA’s reasoning paths as its supplementary training data, improving the ability of the SLM in KBC. Extensive experiments over two public benchmark data sets demonstrate that JCQL surpasses all baselines for both KBC and KBQA tasks.

Event temporal reasoning (ETR) aims to model and reason about the relationships between events and time, as well as between events in the real world. Proficiency in ETR is a significant indicator that a large language model (LLM) truly understands the physical world. Previous question-answering datasets available for evaluating the ETR ability lack a systematic taxonomy and pay limited attention to compound questions. In this paper, we propose a unified taxonomy for event temporal questions and construct a comprehensive benchmark ETRQA, to evaluate the ETR abilities of LLMs based on this taxonomy. ETRQA not only inherits and expands the evaluation content of existing datasets but also contains multiple categories of compound questions. We evaluate two leading LLM series, Llama and Qwen, on ETRQA across various settings. Our experimental results indicate that large-scale LLMs exhibit certain ETR abilities. Yet they do not perform well in solving specific types of reasoning tasks, including reasoning involving time spans, reasoning for compound questions, and reasoning with fine temporal granularity. Additionally, we hope ETRQA can benefit the temporal reasoning research community for future studies.