The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) into autonomous agents has expanded the scope of AI coding from localized code generation to complex, repository-level, and execution-driven problem solving. However, current benchmarks predominantly evaluate code logic in static contexts, neglecting the dynamic, full-process requirements of real-world engineering, particularly in backend development which demands rigorous environment configuration and service deployment. To address this gap, we introduce ABC-Bench, a benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate agentic backend coding within a realistic, executable workflow. Using a scalable automated pipeline, we curated 224 practical tasks spanning 8 languages and 19 frameworks from open-source repositories. Distinct from previous evaluations, ABC-Bench require the agents to manage the entire development lifecycle from repository exploration to instantiating containerized services and pass the external end-to-end API tests. Our extensive evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle to deliver reliable performance on these holistic tasks, highlighting a substantial disparity between current model capabilities and the demands of practical backend engineering.

Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence regularization is essential for stabilizing reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in large language models (LLMs), yet its exact computation requires summing over vocabularies of all tokens, incurring prohibitive memory costs during training. Existing stochastic estimators circumvent this bottleneck by estimating KL divergence using only the sampled token from the trajectory, but suffer from high variance (k₁) or systematic bias (k₂). We propose TIKE (Top-k Importance-weighted KL Estimator), which exploits the Zipfian structure of language model distributions: by deterministically integrating over only the top-k tokens, TIKE captures most of the probability mass while effectively reducing memory cost. To ensure correctness in off-policy settings characteristic of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), we incorporate importance sampling weights that correct for distribution shift between rollout and optimization policies. Experiments on models across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that TIKE consistently outperforms stochastic baselines, while exhibiting substantially lower gradient variance. Our analysis reveals that TIKE closely tracks the exact Rao-Blackwellized estimator with near-zero variance, offering a practical path toward stable, memory-efficient KL regularization for reasoning-intensive LLMs training.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates external knowledge with Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance factual correctness and mitigate hallucination. However, dense retrievers often become the bottleneck of RAG systems due to their limited parameters compared to LLMs and their inability to perform step-by-step reasoning. While prompt-based iterative RAG attempts to address these limitations, it is constrained by human-designed workflows.To address these limitations, we propose R3-RAG, which uses Reinforcement learning to make the LLM learn how to Reason and Retrieve step by step, thus retrieving comprehensive external knowledge and leading to correct answers. R3-RAG is divided into two stages. We first use cold start to make the model learn the manner of iteratively interleaving reasoning and retrieval. Then we use reinforcement learning to further harness its ability to better explore the external retrieval environment.Specifically, we propose two rewards for R3-RAG: 1) answer correctness for outcome reward, which judges whether the trajectory leads to a correct answer; 2) relevance-based document verification for process reward, encouraging the model to retrieve documents that are relevant to the user question, through which we can let the model learn how to iteratively reason and retrieve relevant documents to get the correct answer.Experimental results show that R3-RAG significantly outperforms baselines and can transfer well to different retrievers.

We present REARANK, a large language model (LLM)-based listwise reasoning rerank- ing agent. REARANK explicitly reasons be- fore reranking, significantly improving both performance and interpretability. Leveraging reinforcement learning and data augmentation, REARANK achieves substantial improvements over baseline models across popular informa- tion retrieval benchmarks, notably requiring only 179 annotated samples. Built on top of Qwen2.5-7B, our REARANK-7B demonstrates performance comparable to GPT-4 on both in- domain and out-of-domain benchmarks and even surpasses GPT-4 on reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmarks. These results under- score the effectiveness of our approach and highlight how reinforcement learning can en- hance LLM reasoning capabilities in reranking.