Cheng-Yu Hsieh
2024
Found in the middle: Calibrating Positional Attention Bias Improves Long Context Utilization
Cheng-Yu Hsieh
|
Yung-Sung Chuang
|
Chun-Liang Li
|
Zifeng Wang
|
Long Le
|
Abhishek Kumar
|
James Glass
|
Alexander Ratner
|
Chen-Yu Lee
|
Ranjay Krishna
|
Tomas Pfister
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024
Large language models (LLMs), even when specifically trained to process long input contexts, struggle to capture relevant information located in the middle of their input. This phenomenon has been known as the lost-in-the-middle problem. In this work, we make three contributions. First, we set out to understand the factors that cause this phenomenon. In doing so, we establish a connection between lost-in-the-middle to LLMs’ intrinsic attention bias: LLMs exhibit an U-shaped attention bias where the tokens at the beginning and at the end of its input receive higher attention, regardless of their relevance. Second, we mitigate this positional bias through a calibration mechanism, found-in-the-middle, that allows the model to attend to contexts faithfully according to their relevance, even though when they are in the middle. Third, we show found-in-the-middle not only achieves better performance in locating relevant information within a long context, but also eventually leads to improved retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) performance across various tasks, outperforming existing methods by up to 10 percentage point. These findings open up future directions in understanding LLM attention bias and its potential consequences.
2023
Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes
Cheng-Yu Hsieh
|
Chun-Liang Li
|
Chih-kuan Yeh
|
Hootan Nakhost
|
Yasuhisa Fujii
|
Alex Ratner
|
Ranjay Krishna
|
Chen-Yu Lee
|
Tomas Pfister
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023
Deploying large language models (LLMs) is challenging because they are memory inefficient and compute-intensive for practical applications. In reaction, researchers train smaller task-specific models by either finetuning with human labels or distilling using LLM-generated labels. However, finetuning and distillation require large amounts of training data to achieve comparable performance to LLMs. We introduce Distilling step-by-step, a new mechanism that (a) trains smaller models that outperform LLMs, and (b) achieves so by leveraging less training data needed by finetuning or distillation. Our method extracts LLM rationales as additional supervision for training small models within a multi-task framework. We present three findings across 4 NLP benchmarks: First, compared to both finetuning and distillation, our mechanism achieves better performance with much fewer labeled/unlabeled training examples. Second, compared to few-shot prompted LLMs, we achieve better performance using substantially smaller model sizes. Third, we reduce both the model size and the amount of data required to outperform LLMs; our finetuned 770M T5 model outperforms the few-shot prompted 540B PaLM model using only 80% of available data on a benchmark, whereas standard finetuning the same T5 model struggles to match even by using 100% of the dataset.
Search
Co-authors
- Chun-Liang Li 2
- Ranjay Krishna 2
- Chen-Yu Lee 2
- Tomas Pfister 2
- Chih-kuan Yeh 1
- show all...