Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are vulnerable to poisoning attacks that inject malicious documents into the retrieval process to manipulate model outputs. Recent Agentic RAG systems are more robust to such attacks because they iteratively perform retrieval and reasoning, allowing them to ignore weakly relevant poisoned documents and preserve the reasoning chain induced by the user query. However, existing attacks on Agentic RAG systems often assume white-box access to system prompts, reasoning traces, retrievers, or model parameters, limiting their applicability in realistic settings. In this paper, we study black-box poisoning attacks against Agentic RAG systems, where the attacker can only publish externally retrievable poisoned documents. We propose KidnapRAG, a sequential poisoning attack that hijacks the agent’s multi-step reasoning chain using three role-specific documents: Bait, Chain-Link, and Mal-Ins, which attract initial retrieval, induce query reformulation, and provide attacker-controlled evidence, respectively. Experiments across multiple Agentic RAG frameworks, LLM backbones, and benchmarks show that KidnapRAG consistently outperforms existing poisoning baselines under black-box conditions. Further analyses show that KidnapRAG progressively weakens the original retrieval intent, redirects retrieval behavior, and increases reliance on attacker-controlled evidence.

With the growing adoption of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, various attack methods have been proposed to degrade their performance. However, most existing approaches rely on unrealistic assumptions in which external attackers have access to internal components such as the retriever. To address this issue, we introduce a realistic black-box attack based on the RAG paradox, a structural vulnerability that emerges from the system’s effort to enhance trust by revealing both the retrieved documents and their sources to users. This transparency enables attackers to observe which sources are used and how information is phrased, allowing them to craft poisoned documents that are more likely to be retrieved and upload them to the identified sources. Moreover, as RAG systems directly provide retrieved content to users, these documents must not only be retrievable but also appear natural and credible to prevent users from questioning the search results. Unlike prior work that focuses solely on improving document retrievability, our attack method explicitly considers both retrievability and user trust in the retrieved content. Through extensive offline and online experiments, we demonstrate that our method significantly degrades system performance without internal access, while generating natural-looking poisoned documents.