Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on massive training datasets, often including proprietary data, which raises concerns about unauthorized usage and copyright infringement. Existing dataset inference methods typically require access to log probabilities or other internal signals, but many modern LLMs restrict such access, motivating token-only inference approaches. We propose CatShift, a token-only dataset inference framework based on catastrophic forgetting, where models overwrite prior knowledge when trained on new data. Fine-tuning an LLM on a subset of its training data induces larger output shifts than fine-tuning on unseen data. CatShift compares these shifts against those from a known non-member validation set to infer whether a dataset was included in training. Experiments on both open-source and API-based LLMs show that CatShift remains effective without logit access, enabling practical protection of proprietary datasets.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive progress in image-text comprehension and generation, yet they remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks that can trigger harmful outputs and pose serious safety concerns. Existing multimodal jailbreak attacks have shown the feasibility of such attacks, but they still face two fundamental challenges: the lack of a atomic multi-modal strategy space, the absence of a concise and efficient executable framework beyond human-craft experience. To address these challenges, we first decompose the text-image jailbreak strategy space into three levels: structural, semantic, and syntactic, constructing a jailbreak strategy set encompassing both text and image modalities to systematically achieve combined coverage of different attack types. Then we propose a multimodal automated red team jailbreak method named Hierarchical Atomic Combination Attack (HACA). Specifically, based on a six-dimensional strategy space, a cross-modal joint planner is used to select and combine the different atomic jailbreak strategy for subsequent jailbreak command generation. Finally, at the implementation level, we explore to apply a unified generate executor to directly generate jailbreak instructions based on the selected multi-modal strategies. A series of experiments show that our automated red team method can achieve an attack success rate of average 95.48% against five mainstream MLLMs.

Safety, security, and compliance are essential requirements when aligning large language models (LLMs). However, many seemingly aligned LLMs are soon shown to be susceptible to jailbreak attacks. These attacks aim to circumvent the models’ safety guardrails and security mechanisms by introducing jailbreak prompts into malicious queries. In response to these challenges, this paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism specifically designed to protect LLMs against such sophisticated jailbreak strategies. Unlike previous approaches, which have often compromised the utility of the model for the sake of safety, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs. Our method uses strategically designed suffix prompts that effectively thwart a wide range of standard and adaptive jailbreak techniques. Empirical results conducted on Llama-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP, showing significant reductions in ASR with negligible impact on utility. Our approach not only outperforms existing defense strategies in balancing safety and functionality, but also provides a scalable and robust solution to various LLM platforms.