Metaphorical text expresses meaning through cross-domain mappings rather than literal surface content, which makes it difficult for text-to-image systems to generate semantically faithful images. We propose CMIG, a structured prompting framework inspired by Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). CMIG identifies source–target mappings, filters projectable source attributes, and selects a visual realization strategy in a reproducible reasoning workflow. Experiments on DALL⋅E 3, Imagen 2, and FLUX-1 show that CMIG consistently improves semantic alignment and yields a better overall balance of human-rated metaphor quality, visual coherence, and controllability on metaphorical prompts. To support systematic evaluation, we also construct a 3,500-instance visual metaphor benchmark.

Current metaphor recognition mainly rely on Metaphor Detection Theory (MDT), such as the Metaphor Identification Procedure, which recognizes metaphors by comparing the basic meaning of target word with context meaning. Existing studies have gradually adopted literal annotations to model basic meanings, rejecting the aggregated meanings of target words. However, these methods ignore the problem of interference caused by literal annotations, and do not make full use of semantic expression relations of MDT, making the models difficult to detect and generalize. To address these challenges, we propose a dependency-based Dual-Attention and Global Semantic Improvement (DAGS) framework. DAGS first extracts literal annotations of target words as basic meaning from several mainstream corpora. Then, we apply dependency tree and dual-attention while filtering on input sentences and basic meanings. Finally, we improve the MDT to further consider the global semantic relationship on contexts. The DAGS can not only extract features from multiple information sources but alsoeffectively removes redundancy, while focusing on mission-critical information. We achieve state-of-the-art on several mainstream metaphor datasets (e.g., VUA ALL, VUAverb, TroFi and PSUCMC), which suggests that filtering and global semantic improvement of contexts is crucial for enhancing metaphor recognition performance.

Metaphor, as an advanced form of cognition, is challenging to understand their meaning. Current metaphor detection tasks only provide labels (i.e., metaphor or literal) without interpreting how to understand them. In this paper, we improve the metaphor detection task and explore the reason of metaphor. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first work to reason about metaphor using mainstream Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, we utilized ChatGPT3.5 to expand the mainstream datasets in current metaphor detection, including VUA ALL, TroFi, and MOH-X. We input the original sentence, target word, and usage (metaphor or literal) into ChatGPT, guiding it to generate corresponding metaphor reason. Then, we designed supervised baseline experiments (e.g., RoBERTa, GPT-2) and zero-shot experiments with LLMs (e.g., LLaMA3). For the results generated by the above experiments, we provided the case study. We devised four methods that include manual evaluation to evaluate the reason performance of the model, and discussed extensively the advantages and disadvantages of these evaluation methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/yc-cy/Metaphorical-Reasoning.