While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel as static solvers, transforming them into autonomous agents remains challenging. This transition requires continuous environmental interaction, yet current agents lack the necessary persistent procedural memory. Existing approaches predominantly employ Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to inject explicit textual guidelines into model contexts. However, relying solely on symbolic instructions can introduce a text-action disconnect, frequently failing to activate the internal representations necessary for correct task execution. To address this, the paper introduces Neural Procedural Memory (NPM), a training-free framework that represents agent memory through implicit activation steering rather than explicit instructions. By distilling procedural skills from historical contrastive experiences into steering vectors in the activation space, NPM directly activates the task-relevant neural mechanisms to guide task execution. Evaluations across four agent benchmarks show that NPM performs comparably to baselines using explicit textual instructions. Furthermore, the results show that combining implicit steering with explicit workflows provides complementary advantages, leading to more robust task execution. Representational analyses indicate that these steering vectors encode consistent task logic, forming organized structures within the activation space. These findings suggest that implicit activation steering provides a promising approach for managing agent memory.

Existing reinforcement learning (RL) approaches treat large language models (LLMs) as a unified policy, overlooking their internal mechanisms. In this paper, we decompose the LLM-based policy into Internal Layer Policies and Internal Modular Policies via the Transformer’s residual stream. Our entropy analysis of internal policy reveals distinct patterns: (1) universally, internal policies evolve from high-entropy exploration in early layers to deterministic refinement in the top layers; and (2) Qwen exhibits an explicit progressive reasoning structure, contrasting with the abrupt convergence in Llama. Furthermore, we discover that optimizing internal layers induces feature refinement, forcing lower layers to capture high-level reasoning representations early. Motivated by these findings, we propose Bottom-up Policy Optimization (BuPO), a novel RL paradigm that reconstructs the LLM’s reasoning foundation from the bottom up by optimizing internal layers in early stages. Extensive experiments on complex reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of BuPO.

While memory systems are essential for agent architectures, pervasive architectural fragmentation restricts systematic research. Existing implementations typically couple different stages of the memory lifecycle, entangle evaluation logic with specific datasets, and provide limited support for the management of heterogeneous memory types. We introduce MemTools, an interoperability research framework that decouples memory system components from their underlying deployment environments. MemTools standardizes the memory lifecycle through declarative data contracts, enabling the interchangeable assembly of components across different systems. It orthogonally separates benchmark datasets from execution protocols to facilitate controlled assessments. Furthermore, MemTools provides a unified computational interface for coordinating symbolic, neural, and multimodal memory representations within a shared runtime. Empirical evaluations on cross-system component integration, evaluation protocol reconfiguration, and heterogeneous memory coordination demonstrate that MemTools enables systematic isolation and analysis of memory design variables. These findings suggest that MemTools provides a practical and extensible infrastructure for advancing principled research on agent memory.

Large Language Models (LLMs) can improve commonsense reasoning through generating intermediate knowledge. However, the effectiveness of this knowledge introspection is not always guaranteed. This paper first systematically investigates and reveals an introspection paradox: while simple introspection tends to benefit weaker models, it often degrades the performance of stronger ones, particularly on simpler tasks. Our deep analysis indicates that this paradox arises from a complex interplay among model capability, task difficulty and the quality of generated knowledge. Further interpretability analysis reveals the origins of low-quality knowledge generation. To better employ introspected knowledge in LLM, this paper proposes a training-free Adaptive Introspection Strategy that operates in two stages using only the model’s internal states: Knowledge Detection, which dynamically identifies and discards potentially low-quality knowledge, and Knowledge Regeneration, which employs attention smoothing to guide the model away from harmful failure modes during knowledge generation. Extensive experiments on five Llama models with different sizes and eight commonsense reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach effectively mitigates the limitations of standard introspection and has consistent performance gains across almost all settings.