Open-Domain Timeline Summarization (Open-TLS) seeks to construct coherent evolutionary narratives for a topic by distilling information from large, unstructured web streams. Existing retrieve-and-generate pipelines often fail to capture logically necessary but semantically distant evidence, resulting in macro-level causal gaps (missing intermediate stages) and micro-level element gaps (underspecified milestones). We propose Active Timeline Completion (ATC), an iterative framework that converts implicit narrative gaps into targeted retrieval questions, enabling reflection-driven evidence acquisition. ATC leverages three complementary mechanisms—parametric causal gap detection, historical trajectory analogy, and dynamic ontology-guided completion—while a Logical Utility Verification module ensures only evidence directly addressing these gaps updates the timeline. Experiments on Open-TLS demonstrate that ATC consistently outperforms strong baselines in both content coverage and temporal alignment, showing that active, question-driven retrieval improves the completeness and coherence of open-domain timelines.

Concept induction, which infers appropriate abstract categories from concrete instances, is both a core ontology engineering task and a testbed for LLM semantic abstraction. Although LLMs offer broad knowledge and reasoning that may ease expert-driven ontology construction, prior work shows that knowledge deficiencies still limit them in specialized domains, while systematic evaluation of their induction failures remains lacking. To address this gap, we propose a familiarity-controlled evaluation framework that uses knowledge probing to separate item familiarity from concept induction ability. The evaluation reveals a systematic tendency to induce overly general concepts: LLMs often produce semantically correct but overly broad labels, and direct property augmentation improves performance without resolving this granularity mismatch. We further propose PPACI, an ontology-prior-guided approach that builds concept prototypes by integrating concept definitions with member item properties. For each query group, PPACI uses item properties to retrieve local item-level and global group-level candidate concepts as induction anchors. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that PPACI reduces overly general predictions by 17–28 percentage points while maintaining competitive induction quality. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/Orchideous77/PPACI.

Open-domain timeline summarization (TLS) faces challenges from information overload and data sparsity when processing large-scale textual streams. Existing methods struggle to capture coherent event narratives due to fragmented descriptions and often accumulate noise through iterative retrieval strategies that lack effective relevance evaluation. This paper proposes: Reflective Retrieval-Augmented Timeline Summarization with Causal-Semantic Intergration, which offers a novel perspective for open-domain TLS by time point completion and event element completion. R2A-TLS establishes an initial retrieval, reflection, and deep retrieval system that reduces noise through a double filtering mechanism that iteratively generates a timeline for each text which passes the filtering. Then, the system reflects on the initial timeline with the aim of identifying information gaps through causal chain analysis and FrameNet based element validation. These gaps are reformulated into targeted queries to trigger deep retrieval for refining timeline coherence and density. Empirical evaluation on Open-TLS dataset reveals that our approach outperforms the best prior published approaches.

“本文针对两阶段事件共指消解方法存在的触发词词目启发机制缺乏同义词聚类能力和小模型理解触发词指代事件能力有限等问题,提出了一种基于大模型增强的两阶段高效的事件共指消解方法,一阶段引入大模型进行同义词聚类,二阶段大模型提供触发词解释文本增强小模型。此外,设计了引导小模型侧重触发词特征向量的损失函数。本文方法在保持近似线性时间复杂度的同时,在ECB+和GVC数据集上的CoNLLF1得分分别提升了2.9和8.0。”

Citing comprehensively and appropriately has become a challenging task with the explosive growth of scientific publications. Current citation recommendation systems aim to recommend a list of scientific papers for a given text context or a draft paper. However, none of the existing work focuses on already included citations of full papers, which are imperfect and still have much room for improvement. In the scenario of peer reviewing, it is a common phenomenon that submissions are identified as missing vital citations by reviewers. This may lead to a negative impact on the credibility and validity of the research presented. To help improve citations of full papers, we first define a novel task of Recommending Missed Citations Identified by Reviewers (RMC) and construct a corresponding expert-labeled dataset called CitationR. We conduct an extensive evaluation of several state-of-the-art methods on CitationR. Furthermore, we propose a new framework RMCNet with an Attentive Reference Encoder module mining the relevance between papers, already-made citations, and missed citations. Empirical results prove that RMC is challenging, with the proposed architecture outperforming previous methods in all metrics. We release our dataset and benchmark models to motivate future research on this challenging new task.