Large language models are increasingly deployed as interactive coding agents for end-to-end web development, yet existing benchmarks evaluate narrow slices of this workflow—typically text-conditioned generation with static correctness metrics—overlooking visual fidelity, interactivity, and codebase-level reasoning. We introduce WebCompass, a benchmark that covers the full web development lifecycle by spanning three input modalities (text, image, video) and three task types (generation, editing, repair). To match the diverse nature of these tasks, we pair checklist-guided LLM-as-a-Judge for patch-based evaluation with a novel Agent-as-a-Judge protocol that executes generated websites in a real browser and synthesizes targeted test cases. Experiments on ten models reveal a 25-point gap between the best closed- and open-source models, persistent weaknesses in visual aesthetics even among frontier systems, and divergent performance profiles across task types that challenge the notion of a single "best" web coding agent.