A major challenge for the operation of large language models (LLMs) is how to predict whether a specific LLM will produce sufficiently high-quality output for a given query. Existing approaches rely on external classifiers, most commonly BERT-based models, which suffer from limited context windows, constrained representational capacity, and additional computational overhead. We propose IntroLM, a method that enables causal language models to predict their own output quality during the prefilling phase without affecting generation using [CPX] tokens. By introducing token-conditional LoRA that activates only for the introspective [CPX] token, the model learns to predict the output quality for a given query while preserving the original backbone behavior and avoiding external evaluators. On question-answering benchmarks, IntroLM applied to Qwen3-8B achieves a ROC–AUC of 90% for success prediction, outperforming a DeBERTa-v3-Large classifier by 14%. When integrated into multi-model routing systems, IntroLM achieves superior cost–performance trade-offs, reducing end-to-end latency by up to 33% and large-model usage by up to 50% at matched reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/hhosseini1377/LLM_routing.

The use of LLMs to complete online surveys impacts the validity of survey-based research, but detecting such usage remains under-explored. We introduce an initial benchmark dataset, namely ASURRE, for AI-assisted survey participation to capture usage strategies ranging from full generation and revision to persona-grounded agentic completion. Controlled by these strategies, LLM-assisted survey responses are generated using multiple LLMs on three real-world surveys in different disciplines, paired with genuine human responses. Our evaluation of existing machine-generated text (MGT) detectors shows that naive AI usage is readily detectable, whereas persona-grounded agents that mimic entire respondents push detector performance toward chance. We further show that agentic completion cannot fully replicate respondent-level behaviour and leaves distinctive behavioural traces. While individual cues can be circumvented by targeted prompting, a simple few-shot, training-free aggregator over these cues improves mean AUROC by +0.14 over the best existing detector across agentic settings. Our project is available on GitHub.

Object hallucination remains a persistent reliability issue in large vision-language models, where generated object mentions may sound plausible but lack visual grounding. Recent training-free detectors use internal signals such as token likelihood, attention, visual confidence, or image-text similarity to identify hallucinated objects. These signals are useful, but they are often source-confounded. They measure how strongly an object is supported inside the model without distinguishing whether that support comes from object-specific visual evidence or the generated text prefix. In difficult cases, a hallucinated object can still receive high internal support because it fits the scene, is associated with nearby visual cues, or follows naturally from the generated text prefix. We propose VisER, a training-free two-sided metric for object-level hallucination detection. VisER evaluates each generated object mention from two complementary views. Visual Evidence measures whether object-context compatibility is backed by object-specific evidence from image tokens. Visual Reliance measures whether the object is supported more by the image than by the generated prefix. Combining these views gives a more source-aware grounding score, while avoiding additional object-level verification generations. Across multiple LVLMs and benchmarks, VisER improves AUROC and AUPR over a range of baselines.