In-context learning is a method for improving machine translation in Large Language Models, but its performance is sensitive to the quality of the few-shot example selection. Current retrieval strategies use semantic similarity by computing sentence embeddings, and these methods often require significant computational overhead and specialised expertise. We evaluate the impact of retrieval strategies on translation performance in a specialised domain, comparing traditional, token-based fuzzy matching against semantic sentence embeddings. We use a medical corpus from the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for the English-Romanian and English-German language pairs, and we evaluate translation quality with automatic metrics and manual evaluation. Our results show that 1-shot and 5-shot prompting significantly outperforms the 0-shot baselines for quality in automatic evaluations for both language pairs, and in manual evaluation for English-German. For the English-Romanian pair, the average scores of the manual evaluation for both quality and ranking follow the same trend, but with no statistical significance. Token-based fuzzy matching overwhelmingly has higher automatic quality scores than embedding-based retrieval.