Daud Abolade


2024

pdf bib
Voices Unheard: NLP Resources and Models for Yorùbá Regional Dialects
Orevaoghene Ahia | Anuoluwapo Aremu | Diana Abagyan | Hila Gonen | David Ifeoluwa Adelani | Daud Abolade | Noah A. Smith | Yulia Tsvetkov
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Yoruba—an African language with roughly 47 million speakers—encompasses a continuum with several dialects. Recent efforts to develop NLP technologies for African languages have focused on their standard dialects, resulting in disparities for dialects and varieties for which there are little to no resources or tools. We take steps towards bridging this gap by introducing a new high-quality parallel text and speech corpus; YORULECT across three domains and four regional yoruba dialects. To develop this corpus, we engaged native speakers, traveling to communities where these dialects are spoken, to collect text and speech data. Using our newly created corpus, we conducted extensive experiments on (text) machine translation, automatic speech recognition, and speech-to-text translation. Our results reveal substantial performance disparities between standard yoruba and the other dialects across all tasks. However, we also show that with dialect-adaptive finetuning, we are able to narrow this gap. We believe our dataset and experimental analysis will contribute greatly to developing NLP tools for Yoruba and its dialects, and potentially for other African languages, by improving our understanding of existing challenges and offering a high-quality dataset for further development. We will release YORULECT dataset and models publicly under an open license.

pdf bib
AfriMTE and AfriCOMET: Enhancing COMET to Embrace Under-resourced African Languages
Jiayi Wang | David Adelani | Sweta Agrawal | Marek Masiak | Ricardo Rei | Eleftheria Briakou | Marine Carpuat | Xuanli He | Sofia Bourhim | Andiswa Bukula | Muhidin Mohamed | Temitayo Olatoye | Tosin Adewumi | Hamam Mokayed | Christine Mwase | Wangui Kimotho | Foutse Yuehgoh | Anuoluwapo Aremu | Jessica Ojo | Shamsuddeen Muhammad | Salomey Osei | Abdul-Hakeem Omotayo | Chiamaka Chukwuneke | Perez Ogayo | Oumaima Hourrane | Salma El Anigri | Lolwethu Ndolela | Thabiso Mangwana | Shafie Mohamed | Hassan Ayinde | Oluwabusayo Awoyomi | Lama Alkhaled | Sana Al-azzawi | Naome Etori | Millicent Ochieng | Clemencia Siro | Njoroge Kiragu | Eric Muchiri | Wangari Kimotho | Toadoum Sari Sakayo | Lyse Naomi Wamba | Daud Abolade | Simbiat Ajao | Iyanuoluwa Shode | Ricky Macharm | Ruqayya Iro | Saheed Abdullahi | Stephen Moore | Bernard Opoku | Zainab Akinjobi | Abeeb Afolabi | Nnaemeka Obiefuna | Onyekachi Ogbu | Sam Ochieng’ | Verrah Otiende | Chinedu Mbonu | Yao Lu | Pontus Stenetorp
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Despite the recent progress on scaling multilingual machine translation (MT) to several under-resourced African languages, accurately measuring this progress remains challenging, since evaluation is often performed on n-gram matching metrics such as BLEU, which typically show a weaker correlation with human judgments. Learned metrics such as COMET have higher correlation; however, the lack of evaluation data with human ratings for under-resourced languages, complexity of annotation guidelines like Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM), and limited language coverage of multilingual encoders have hampered their applicability to African languages. In this paper, we address these challenges by creating high-quality human evaluation data with simplified MQM guidelines for error detection and direct assessment (DA) scoring for 13 typologically diverse African languages. Furthermore, we develop AfriCOMET: COMET evaluation metrics for African languages by leveraging DA data from well-resourced languages and an African-centric multilingual encoder (AfroXLM-R) to create the state-of-the-art MT evaluation metrics for African languages with respect to Spearman-rank correlation with human judgments (0.441).