Doug Arnold


1999

pdf bib
Web Access to Corpora: the W3Corpora Project
Doug Arnold
EACL 1999: Computer and Internet Supported Education in Language and Speech Technology

1996

pdf bib
TSNLP - Test Suites for Natural Language Processing
Sabine Lehmann | Stephan Oepen | Sylvie Regnier-Prost | Klaus Netter | Veronika Lux | Judith Klein | Kirsten Falkedal | Frederik Fouvry | Dominique Estival | Eva Dauphin | Herve Compagnion | Judith Baur | Lorna Balkan | Doug Arnold
COLING 1996 Volume 2: The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

1994

pdf bib
Test Suites for Natural Language Processing
Lorna Balkan | Doug Arnold | Siety Meije
Proceedings of Translating and the Computer 16

1993

pdf bib
Experiments in Reusability of Grammatical Resources
Doug Arnold | Toni Badia | Josef van Genabith | Stella Markantonatou | Stefan Momma | Louisa Sadler | Paul Schmidt
Sixth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

1992

pdf bib
A Constraint-Based Approach to Translating Anaphoric Dependencies
Louisa Sadler | Doug Arnold
COLING 1992 Volume 2: The 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

pdf bib
Rationalism and the treatment of referential dependencies
Doug Arnold | Louisa Sadler
Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

1991

pdf bib
EUROTRA: an assessment of the current state of the EC’s MT programme Machine Translation Seen as Interactive Multilingual Text Generation
Doug Arnold | Louisa Sadler
Proceedings of Translating and the Computer 13: The theory and practice of machine translation – a marriage of convenience?

1989

pdf bib
An Approach to Sentence-Level Anaphora in Machine Translation
Gertjan van Noord | Joke Dorrepaal | Doug Arnold | Steven Krauwer | Louisa Sadler | Louis des Tombe
Fourth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

1988

pdf bib
‘Relaxed’ compositionality in machine translation
Doug Arnold | Steven Krauwer | Louis des Tombe | Louisa Sadler
Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

1987

pdf bib
A Model for Preference
Dominique Petitpierre | Steven Krauwer | Louis des Tombe | Doug Arnold | Giovanni B. Varile
Third Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

1985

bib
A MUl View of the <C,A>, T Framework in EUROTRA
Doug Arnold | Lieven Jaspaert | Rod Johnson | Steven Krauwer | Mike Rosner | Louis des Tombe | Nino Varile | Susan Warwick
Proceedings of the first Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

bib
A Preliminary Linguistic Framework for EUROTRA, June 1985
Louis des Tombe | Doug Arnold | Lieven Jaspaert | Rod Johnson | Steven Krauwer | Mike Rosner | Nino Varile | Susan Warwick
Proceedings of the first Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

1984

pdf bib
Robust Processing in Machine Translation
Doug Arnold | Rod Johnson
10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

pdf bib
Robust processing in machine translation
Doug Arnold | Rod Johnson
Proceedings of the International Conference on Methodology and Techniques of Machine Translation: Processing from words to language

We attempt to develop a general theory of robust processing for natural language, and especially Machine Translation purposes. That is, a general characterization of methods by which processes can be made resistant to malfunctioning of various kinds. We distinguish three sources of malfunction: (a) deviant inputs, (b) deviant outputs, and (c) deviant pairings of input and output, and describe the assumptions that guide our discussion (sections 1 and 2). We classify existing approaches to (a)and (b)-robustness, noting that not only do such approaches fail to provide a solution to (c)-type problems, but that the natural consequence of these solutions is to make (c)-type malfunctions harder to detect (section 3) In the final section (4) we outline possible solutions to (c)-type malfunctions.