Identifying personality accurately can improve interpretability and adaptability for human–computer interaction and psychological assessment. Recent studies have introduced evidence utterance into large language models (LLMs) for personality recognition, providing supporting evidence to explain personality labels. However, the mixed background and social expressions in dialogue scenarios interfere with the identification of evidence utterance. At the same time, the overconfidence of LLMs leads to biased personality inference. Inspired by the lens theory in psychology, how to systematically explore the mutual influence between evidence utterance identification and personality recognition while improving the performance of both tasks remains a key challenge. In this paper, we reframe personality recognition as an Evidence-Personality Iterative Reasoning problem (EPIR). A graph model is employed to select an initial evidence utterance set, and personality recognition is performed based on a Generative-Discriminative Feedback mechanism. Then, the inferred results are fed back to the graph mapping network to dynamically adjust evidence utterance filtering. This interactive iterative process continues until the evidence and personality results across different iterations converge. Experimental results on the two public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

We observe that entropy in reinforcement learning functions analogously to the learning rate in LLMs. Maintaining stable entropy, as demonstrated in DAPO, helps stabilize RL training, while rapid entropy annealing (i.e., so-called entropy collapse) accelerates local performance improvement and enables faster convergence. We argue that these two processes are not antithetical, but can be effectively controlled and scheduled within a single training run, similar to learning rate scheduling. We propose Entropy Schduling (ES), which optimizes different pre-set goals (e.g. k in optimizing Pass@k) by controlling and scheduling entropy at each step of the RL process. We find that maintaining stable entropy early in training followed by entropy annealing achieves superior performance. Moreover, since stable-state entropy and annealed entropy exhibit distinctly different learning dynamics, curriculum learning can be seamlessly integrated to maximize model performance based on different entropy phases. We show that entropy scheduling is straightforward to implement and intuitive in design. Extensive experiments suggest that it delivers consistent and stable performance improvements across diverse models and algorithms.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents for long-horizon tasks, managing unbounded interaction trajectories under fixed context budgets becomes a core systems challenge. Unlike standard long-context documents, agent trajectories are heterogeneous and interleave observations, reasoning traces, and tool executions, so compression must preserve temporal dependencies, actionable state, and structural fidelity. Yet existing methods remain fragmented, making it difficult to compare design choices and reason about their reliability implications. This survey introduces a unified taxonomy of agent context compression along three dimensions: compression target (what is compressed), compression mechanism (how it is transformed and retained), and control policy (who decides when compression is triggered). We further organize recurring failures in compressed execution into F1: Pre-compression Decision Error, F2: In-compression Information Loss, and F3: Post-compression Access Failure, and examine domain-specific trade-offs in software engineering, web navigation, and deep research. By unifying the design space, failure taxonomy, and evaluation perspective, this survey provides a foundation for building scalable and recoverable LLM agents.

As social media grows, harmful information spreads rapidly across platforms and evolves over time, showing cross-platform and cross-temporal variations. Existing methods rely on fixed model parameters during training, which fail to handle substantial semantic discrepancies, leading to Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) problems. While test-time tuning enables dynamic parameter adjustment, it may lead to excessive adaptation to individual samples. The key challenge is how to adapt to semantic variations during testing while preventing overfitting from continuous tuning. To tackle this issue, this paper proposes RLAT, a reinforcement learning (RL)–guided adaptive tuning method for harmful text detection. First, a tuning joint optimization module is designed to update parameters and adapt to semantic variations during testing. It tunes the model by optimizing consistency loss and applying word-level attention constraints to reduce over-reliance on local words and learn a more robust global representation. Then, to mitigate overfitting caused by continuous tuning, a RL–guided adaptive decision model is introduced to direct the tuning process. It reduces the influence of local samples by selecting data and controlling parameter updates, thereby improving overall test performance. Experimental results show that the RLAT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in cross-platform and cross-temporal scenarios across multiple public datasets.

Recent advances in handling long sequences have unlocked new possibilities for long-context in-context learning (ICL). While existing research predominantly focuses on performance gains driven by additional in-context examples, the impact on the trustworthiness of generated responses remains underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how increased examples influence predictive uncertainty—an essential aspect in trustworthiness. We begin by systematically quantifying uncertainty across different “shot” configurations in ICL, emphasizing the role of example quantity. Through uncertainty decomposition, we introduce a novel perspective on performance enhancement, focusing on epistemic uncertainty (EU). Our results reveal that additional examples reduce total uncertainty in both simple and complex tasks by injecting task-specific knowledge, thereby diminishing EU and enhancing performance. For complex tasks, these advantages emerge only after addressing the increased noise and uncertainty associated with longer inputs. Finally, we investigate the progression of internal confidence across layers, uncovering the underlying mechanisms that drive the reduction in uncertainty.

Positional bias (PB), manifesting as non-uniform sensitivity across different contextual locations, significantly impairs long-context comprehension and processing capabilities. Previous studies have addressed PB either by modifying the underlying architectures or by employing extensive contextual awareness training. However, the former approach fails to effectively eliminate the substantialperformance disparities, while the latter imposes significant data and computational overhead. To address PB effectively, we introduce Pos2Distill, a position to position knowledge distillation framework. Pos2Distill transfers the superior capabilities from advantageous positions to less favorable ones, thereby reducing the huge performance gaps. The conceptual principle is to leverage the inherent, position-induced disparity to counteract the PB itself. We identify distinct manifestations of PB under retrieval and reasoning paradigms, thereby designing two specialized instantiations: Pos2Distill-R1 and Pos2Distill-R2 respectively, both grounded in this core principle. By employing the Pos2Distill approach, we achieve enhanced uniformity and significant performance gains across all contextual positions in long-context retrieval and reasoning tasks. Crucially, both specialized systems exhibit strong cross-task generalization mutually, while achieving superior performance on their respective tasks.

Stance detection aims to identify the attitudes toward specific targets from text, which is an important research area in text mining and social media analytics. Existing research is mainly conducted in monolingual setting on English datasets. To tackle the data scarcity problem in low-resource languages, cross-lingual stance detection (CLSD) transfers the knowledge from high-resource (source) language to low-resource (target) language. The CLSD task is the most challenging in zero-shot setting when no training data is available in target language, and transferring stance-relevant knowledge learned from high-resource language to bridge the language gap is the key for improving the performance of zero-shot CLSD. In this paper, we leverage the capability of large language model (LLM) for stance knowledge acquisition, and propose KEAR, a knowledge elicitation and retrieval framework. The knowledge elicitation module in KEAR first derives different types of stance knowledge from LLM’s reasoning process. Then, the knowledge retrieval module in KEAR matches the target language input to the most relevant stance knowledge for enhancing text representations. Experiments on multilingual datasets show the effectiveness of KEAR compared with competitive baselines as well as the CLSD approaches trained with labeled data in target language.

In this paper, we investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) actively recall or retrieve their internal repositories of factual knowledge when faced with reasoning tasks. Through an analysis of LLMs’ internal factual recall at each reasoning step via Knowledge Neurons, we reveal that LLMs fail to harness the critical factual associations under certain circumstances. Instead, they tend to opt for alternative, shortcut-like pathways to answer reasoning questions. By manually manipulating the recall process of parametric knowledge in LLMs, we demonstrate that enhancing this recall process directly improves reasoning performance whereas suppressing it leads to notable degradation. Furthermore, we assess the effect of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a powerful technique for addressing complex reasoning tasks. Our findings indicate that CoT can intensify the recall of factual knowledge by encouraging LLMs to engage in orderly and reliable reasoning. Furthermore, we explored how contextual conflicts affect the retrieval of facts during the reasoning process to gain a comprehensive understanding of the factual recall behaviors of LLMs. Code and data will be available soon.