Disen Liao
Author directory2026
Cross-Session Decomposition Attacks: Scaling Risk and Intent-Aligned Retrieval Defense
Disen Liao | Yihan Wang | Freda Shi | Yaoliang Yu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Disen Liao | Yihan Wang | Freda Shi | Yaoliang Yu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Scaling laws are usually read as a capability story: lower language-modeling loss yields more useful models. We study a safety consequence of this mechanism in cross-session decomposition attacks, where benign-looking subqueries are asked across independent interactions and later recomposed toward a forbidden objective. We formalize this setting as compositional safety risk and prove a conditional risk-transfer bound: when the reference environment already contains dispersed evidence for a risky reconstruction, the gap between deployed composed risk and reference composed risk is controlled by the model’s excess loss on allowed subqueries. Synthetic withholding experiments show that wider transformers assign lower loss to held-out instructions that never appear verbatim in training but are recoverable from injected supporting facts. A 600-intent pretrained-LLM evaluation shows that larger Qwen3 and Gemma3 family members can yield greater harmful-capability uplift under a fixed decomposition-composition pipeline. As a defense, IntentAlign-MiniLM, our 22M intent-aligned retriever, outperforms much larger embedding models on held-out intent retrieval and yields the best learned-retriever harmful recall across tested guardrails.
How Tokenization Limits Phonological Knowledge Representation in Language Models and How to Improve Them
Disen Liao | Freda Shi
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Disen Liao | Freda Shi
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Tokenization is the first step in every language model (LM), yet it never takes the sounds of words into account. We investigate how tokenization influences text-only LMs’ ability to represent phonological knowledge. Through a series of probing experiments, we show that subword-based tokenization systematically weakens the encoding of both local (e.g., rhyme) and global (e.g., syllabification) phonological features. To quantify this effect, we introduce the syllabification-tokenization alignment distance (STAD), a metric that measures the misalignment between a model’s tokenization and the natural syllable boundaries of words, and find that higher misalignment correlates with poorer phonological representations, providing a simple diagnostic for phonology-aware tokenization. To address these limitations, we propose a lightweight IPA-based fine-tuning method that infuses phonological awareness into LMs, leading to consistent improvements across three phonology-related tasks while largely preserving math and general reasoning ability, with 1.1% and 0.9% drops on GSM8K and MMLU, respectively.[Our code is available at https://github.com/liaodisen/Tokenization-Phonology]