Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly organized into multi-agent systems for complex reasoning and decision-making tasks. However, scaling such systems can substantially increase inference cost, especially when multiple agents repeatedly process overlapping or role-irrelevant context. Many existing multi-agent frameworks focus on orchestration and role specialization, but still rely on full-context sharing or static context routing, leading to redundant token consumption, increased runtime, and inefficient memory utilization. We present Role-Conditioned Context Routing (RCR), an execution-time layer that allocates role-relevant shared-memory items to agents under token budgets. Given a structured shared memory and a set of role-specialized agents, RCR selectively routes task-relevant memory items to each agent according to its role, optional task-stage metadata, and token budget. RCR integrates role-conditioned relevance scoring, token-budgeted memory selection, and iterative memory updates to reduce redundant context exposure during multi-agent execution. Experiments on multi-hop QA, embodied reasoning (ALFWorld), and web-based decision-making (WebShop) show that RCR reduces token usage by 35% on average and runtime by 38% on average relative to Full-Context, while maintaining or improving task performance.

Current data science (DS) code generation benchmarks equate correctness with quality, overlooking execution time differences that span orders of magnitude between correct solutions. We introduce DSEffi-Bench, the first benchmark specifically targeting execution efficiency in LLM-generated DS code, comprising 1,000 instances across 10+ DS libraries with stress-testing harnesses and human-validated references. Evaluating 16 models across 3 tiers, we find that correctness alone fails to characterize efficiency: GPT-5.4 leads in correctness (Pass, 66.9%) but its efficiency score (B|P, 71.7%) nearly matches GPT-5.4-mini (71.6%), which solves 47 fewer tasks; Kimi-K2.5 ranks lowest in correctness among frontier models (40.2%) yet achieves the highest efficiency score (73.6%) across all 16 models. A human-annotated five-category taxonomy reveals that 79.1% of efficiency deficits extend beyond algorithmic complexity to domain-specific root causes, with distinct failure profiles across model tiers and libraries. Two exploratory experiments provide initial evidence that these diagnostics can guide improvement, yielding up to +14.7% efficiency gains via taxonomy-guided optimization and approaching Claude-Opus-4.6 Best@3 in efficiency at 13.0× lower cost via library-conditioned routing. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Albert-Gong/DSEffi-Bench.

Large language models are increasingly deployed as coding agents, shifting safety from individual responses to action sequences. Existing benchmarks, however, primarily assess whether models refuse unsafe prompts, leaving impacts on stateful workspaces largely unexamined. We present SABER, a benchmark for environment-aware operational safety that places models in realistic agent-style projects and evaluates safety from the final environment state after a sequence of actions. Beyond binary safety-violation reports, SABER categorizes violations by cause, enabling analysis of model-specific safety profiles. Our evaluations show that even the best-performing model has more than a 54% harmful safety-violation rate (HSR), suggesting that current alignment remains insufficient for realistic project environments. SABER further reveals distinct safety profiles across models. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/sssr-lab/saber.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have substantially improved the functional correctness of code translation, the critical dimension of execution efficiency remains overlooked. We present Trace, the first benchmark to explicitly assess efficiency in LLM-translated code. Trace includes 1,000 efficiency-critical tasks across C++, Java, and Python, each augmented with stress tests that reveal efficiency disparities often overlooked by small-scale tests. Using Trace, we conduct an extensive evaluation of 28 representative LLMs and highlight several key insights: 1) Correctness and efficiency are often misaligned: the correctness leader Claude-Sonnet-4-Think achieves only moderate time efficiency, outperformed by smaller open-source LLMs such as Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct. 2) Inefficiency is both prevalent and patterned: 23.5% of correct translations suffer from notable inefficiency, mainly arising from algorithm implementation discrepancy (11.9%), language construct mismatch (66.4%), and resource management inefficiency (21.7%).3) Inference-time prompt strategies bring only modest improvements, indicating that simple prompting alone is insufficient to improve translation efficiency. Together, our results establish execution efficiency as an essential dimension of code translation and position Trace as a principled foundation for efficiency-oriented evaluation. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/Albert-Gong/TRACE.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has been widely adopted to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) on Text-to-SQL tasks. However, existing methods often rely on execution-based or LLM-based Bradley–Terry reward models. The former suffers from high execution latency caused by repeated database calls, whereas the latter imposes substantial GPU memory overhead, both of which significantly hinder the efficiency and scalability of RL pipelines. To this end, we propose a novel reward model framework for RL-based Text-to-SQL named Graph-Reward-SQL, which employs the GMNScore outcome reward model. We leverage SQL graph representations to provide accurate reward signals while significantly reducing time cost and GPU memory usage. Building on this foundation, we further introduce StepRTM, a stepwise reward model that provides intermediate supervision over Common Table Expression (CTE) subqueries. This encourages both functional correctness and readability of SQL. Extensive comparative and ablation experiments on standard benchmarks, including Spider and BIRD, demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing reward models.

Training LLMs with Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture on long sequences poses significant challenges due to the all-to-all communication bottleneck of expert parallelism. While existing approaches attempt to hide the communication costs in computation through token-level pipelining within MoE layers, their effectiveness is limited by the insufficient computation. We present FoldMoE, a high-performance MoE training system that enables token-level overlapping across entire Transformer blocks through novel attention-MoE pipelining. We propose an efficient pipeline schedule, and a novel token buffering design to decouple attention and MoE layer partitioning, along with a time-uniform micro-batching strategy for enhanced efficiency. Evaluations on GPT-MoE models with sequences up to 32K tokens show that FoldMoE achieves up to 1.49x and 2.72x speedup over state-of-the-art token-level overlapping and non-overlapping baselines respectively.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have reshaped code generation by synergizing their exceptional comprehension of natural language and programming syntax, thereby substantially boosting developer productivity. These advancements have prompted numerous efforts to quantitatively evaluate their coding capabilities. However, persistent challenges, such as benchmark leakage, data dissipation, and limited system accessibility, continue to impede a timely and accurate assessment. To address these limitations, we introduce CodeArena, an online evaluation framework tailored for LLM code generation. Its key innovation is a collective evaluation mechanism, which dynamically recalibrates individual model scores based on the holistic performance of all participating models, mitigating score biases caused by widespread benchmark leakage. In addition, CodeArena ensures open access to all submitted solutions and test cases and provides automation-friendly APIs to streamline the code evaluation workflow. Our main contributions are: (1) a collective evaluation system for unbiased assessment, (2) a public repository of solutions and test cases, and (3) automation-ready APIs for seamless integration.