Donghyeon Ko
Author directory2026
What Models Know, How Well They Know It: Knowledge-Weighted Fine-Tuning for Learning When to Say “I Don’t Know”
Joosung Lee | Hwiyeol Jo | Donghyeon Ko | Kyubyung Chae | Cheonbok Park | Jeonghoon Kim
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Joosung Lee | Hwiyeol Jo | Donghyeon Ko | Kyubyung Chae | Cheonbok Park | Jeonghoon Kim
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities across diverse user queries, they still suffer from hallucinations, often arising from knowledge misalignment between pre-training and fine-tuning. To address this misalignment, we reliably estimate a fine-grained, instance-level knowledge score via multi-sampled inference. Using the knowledge score, we scale the learning signal according to the model’s existing knowledge, while encouraging explicit “I don’t know” responses for out-of-scope queries. Experimental results show that this approach allows the model to explicitly express uncertainty when it lacks knowledge, while maintaining accuracy on questions it can answer. Furthermore, we propose evaluation metrics for uncertainty, showing that accurate discrimination between known and unknown instances consistently improves performance.
2025
Building Helpful-Only Large Language Models: A Complete Approach from Motivation to Evaluation
Donghyeon Ko | Sohee Yang | Donghyun Kwak | Sang-Woo Lee
Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 4th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Donghyeon Ko | Sohee Yang | Donghyun Kwak | Sang-Woo Lee
Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 4th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF) is widely used for customizing the safety policies of large language models (LLMs) at scale. However, standard aligned LLMs are poorly suited in this setting, as their fixed alignment prevents adaptation to new policies. To address this, prior works have employed Helpful-Only LLMs (HOLLMs). Despite their effectiveness, no public framework exists for training or evaluating HOLLMs. In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for developing HOLLMs that enable custom safety alignment. We first define the key attributes of a HOLLM and then propose Refusal-Avoidant Instruction Learning (RAIL), a novel training method that constructs HOLLMs from open-source datasets. We also introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework including a new benchmark: Helpfulness Evaluation without Limitations from Policies (HELP). Experiments show that the HOLLM achieves a 30.28% reduction in refusal rate over the strongest refusal-optimized baseline without compromising general capabilities. The HOLLM also achieves a 29.25% higher accuracy on HELP compared to the best-performing baseline. These results demonstrate that RAIL effectively cultivates the key attributes required of a HOLLM.