Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) enable interpretability research by decomposing entangled model activations into monosemantic features. However, under what circumstances SAEs derive most fine-grained latent features for safety—a low-frequency concept domain—remains unexplored. Two key challenges exist: identifying SAEs with the greatest potential for generating safety domain-specific features, and the prohibitively high cost of detailed feature explanation. In this paper, we propose Safe-SAIL, a unified framework for interpreting SAE features in safety-critical domains to advance mechanistic understanding of large language models. Safe-SAIL introduces a pre-explanation evaluation metric to efficiently identify SAEs with strong safety domain-specific interpretability, and reduces interpretation cost by 55% through a segment-level simulation strategy. Building on Safe-SAIL, we train a comprehensive suite of SAEs with human-readable explanations and systematic evaluations for 1,758 safety-related features spanning four domains: pornography, politics, violence, and terror. Using this resource, we conduct empirical analyses and provide insights on the effectiveness of Safe-SAIL for risk feature identification and how safety-critical entities and concepts are encoded across model layers. All models, explanations, and tools are publicly released in an open-source toolkit at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Safe-SAIL/.

Creating spoken dialogue datasets is methodologically challenging, and these challenges are amplified when the goal is to build multilingual, multi-parallel datasets at scale. This work introduces HEALTHDIAL, a large-scale, multilingual, and multi-parallel dataset for developing and evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)–based spoken dialogue systems. The dataset comprises 6,000 information-seeking dialogues (1,500 per language) grounded in trusted content from the World Health Organization (WHO) and 163 hours of user speech recorded from native speakers of diverse dialects across four official WHO languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, and Spanish. Each speaker is annotated with demographic (e.g., gender, age) and sociolinguistic (e.g., primary language, region of origin) variables. We report benchmark results across key dialogue tasks, which reveal consistent performance disparities across languages, even among high-resource ones. To support future research, we release the dataset, a prototype system, and a toolkit for data collection and system evaluation.

Confidence calibration, the alignment of a model’s predicted confidence with its actual accuracy, is critical for the reliable deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet remains under-explored in multilingual contexts. We conduct the first large-scale systematic study of multilingual calibration across eight model families and over 100 languages, finding that non-English languages are worse-calibrated than English (e.g., LLaMA3’s average Expected Calibration Error is 23.1% on non-English against 4.6% on English). To diagnose this, we investigate the model’s internal representations and find that the final layer, biased by English-centric training, provides a poor signal for multilingual confidence, whereas late-intermediate layers offer a better-calibrated signal. Building on this, we introduce a suite of training-free methods, including Language-Aware Confidence Ensemble (LACE), which adaptively selects an ensemble of layers for each language. Both the multilingual calibration gap and the late-intermediate peak persist beyond MCQA, in open-ended QA, chain-of-thought reasoning, and alternative MCQA scoring protocols. Our study highlights the costs of English-centric alignment and offers a path toward more globally equitable LLMs.

Cross-lingual alignment in multilingual language models is typically attributed to joint training: shared parameters, mixed-language batches, or explicit alignment objectives. We ask whether monolingual models trained on non-parallel data learn alignable representations without joint training. By testing on strictly monolingual language models, such as the Goldfish model families and independently developed models from different research labs, we find three results. Correlation: these models develop alignable representational geometry across layers, with alignment strengthening as data scale, model scale, or linguistic proximity increases. Construction: a single Procrustes rotation fit on parallel sentences maps hidden states between models. Causation: the same rotation transfers functional content; patching a rotated English residual into a German model on a factual cloze flips the prediction to the donor’s capital in most cases. We confirm that cross-lingual alignment can emerge from the structure of language and the information it carries rather than from joint training, and this points to practical future directions including model stitching, merging, and modular multilingual systems built from monolingual components.

Language identification (LID) is a fundamental step in curating multilingual corpora. However, LID models still perform poorly for many languages, especially on the noisy and heterogeneous web data often used to train multilingual language models. In this paper, we introduce CommonLID, a community-driven, human-annotated LID benchmark for the web domain, covering 109 languages. Many of the included languages have been previously under-served, making CommonLID a key resource for developing more representative high-quality text corpora. We show CommonLID’s value by using it, alongside five other common evaluation sets, to test eight popular LID models. We analyse our results to situate our contribution and to provide an overview of the state of the art. In particular, we highlight that existing evaluations overestimate LID accuracy for many languages in the web domain. We make CommonLID and the code used to create it available under an open, permissive license.

Do independently trained monolingual language models converge on shared linguistic principles? To explore this question, we propose to analyze a suite of models trained separately on single languages but with identical architectures and budgets. We train sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on model activations to obtain interpretable latent features, then align them across languages using activation correlations. We do pairwise analyses to see if feature spaces show non-trivial convergence, and we identify universal features that consistently emerge across diverse models. Positive results will provide evidence that certain high-level regularities in language are rediscovered independently in machine learning systems.

Most existing cross-lingual summarization (CLS) work constructs CLS corpora by simply and directly translating pre-annotated summaries from one language to another, which can contain errors from both summarization and translation processes. To address this issue, we propose ConvSumX, a cross-lingual conversation summarization benchmark, through a new annotation schema that explicitly considers source input context. ConvSumX consists of 2 sub-tasks under different real-world scenarios, with each covering 3 language directions. We conduct thorough analysis on ConvSumX and 3 widely-used manually annotated CLS corpora and empirically find that ConvSumX is more faithful towards input text. Additionally, based on the same intuition, we propose a 2-Step method, which takes both conversation and summary as input to simulate human annotation process. Experimental results show that 2-Step method surpasses strong baselines on ConvSumX under both automatic and human evaluation. Analysis shows that both source input text and summary are crucial for modeling cross-lingual summaries.