Large language model agents have made strong progress on software engineering, yet current systems suffer from a context coupling problem: the standard code editing interface conflates code inspection, modification planning, and edit execution within a single context window, forcing agents to interleave exploratory viewing with strictly formatted edit generation. Irrelevant context accumulates and edit reliability degrades. We propose SWE-Edit, which decomposes the editing interface into two specialized subagents: a Viewer that extracts task-relevant code on demand, and an Editor that executes modifications from high-level natural language plans—letting the main agent focus on reasoning while delegating context-intensive operations to clean context windows. We further show that effective edit-format selection can be trained into a small model rather than requiring frontier-scale capacity: GRPO training on Qwen3-8B improves edit success by 12.5 pp and brings an 8B open-source editor to parity with GPT-5-nano on downstream SWE-Bench resolve rate, with the learned adaptive find-replace/whole-file-rewrite policy contributing primarily on the cost axis (-11.8% agent cost). To enable rapid editor iteration, we release PR-Edit, a lightweight editor-level evaluation that rank-orders the editor models we test consistently with their downstream SWE-Bench resolve rate. We release our code at https://github.com/microsoft/SWE-Edit.

Code translation benchmarks are essential for evaluating the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-based systems. Existing benchmarks mainly target individual functions, overlooking repository-level challenges like intermodule coherence and dependency management. Recent repository-level efforts exist, but suffer from poor maintainability and coarse evaluation granularity. We introduce Skeleton-Guided-Translation, a framework for benchmarking Java-to-C# translation at the repository level, featuring fine-grained quality evaluation. It follows a two-step process: first translating repository “skeletons”, then refining the entire repository guided by these skeletons. Based on this, we present TRANSREPO-BENCH , the first test-driven benchmark of high-quality Java repositories paired with C# skeletons, unit tests, and build configurations. Our adaptive unit tests support multiple and incremental translations without manual tuning, enhancing automation and scalability. We also propose fine-grained metrics that evaluate translation quality per test case, overcoming limitations of binary metrics in distinguishing build failures. Evaluations using TRANSREPO-BENCH reveal issues like broken cross-file references, showing that our structured approach reduces dependency errors and preserves interface consistency.

Large Language Models have advanced automated software development, however, it remains a challenge to correctly infer dependencies, namely, identifying the internal components and external packages required for a repository to successfully run. Existing studies highlight that dependency-related issues cause over 40% of observed runtime errors on the generated repository. To address this, we introduce DI-BENCH, a large-scale benchmark and evaluation framework specifically designed to assess LLMs’ capability on dependency inference. The benchmark features 581 repositories with testing environments across Python, C#, Rust, and JavaScript. Extensive experiments with textual and execution-based metrics reveal that the current best-performing model achieves only a 48% execution pass rate on Python, indicating significant room for improvement. DI-BENCH establishes a new viewpoint for evaluating LLM performance on repositories, paving the way for more robust end-to-end software synthesis.