Emilio Raimond
Author directory2026
Overview of SHROOM-Visions 2026: A Shared Task on Hallucination Detection in Large Vision-Language Models
Raúl Vázquez | Aman Sinha | Chuyuan Li | Artem Shelmanov | Artem Vazhentsev | Claudio Savelli | Eduardo Calò | Emilio Raimond | Stella Frank | Hengyu Luo | Flavio Giobergia | Vincent Segonne | Lorenzo Vaiani | Jörg Tiedemann | Timothee Mickus
The Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Uncertainty-Aware NLP
Raúl Vázquez | Aman Sinha | Chuyuan Li | Artem Shelmanov | Artem Vazhentsev | Claudio Savelli | Eduardo Calò | Emilio Raimond | Stella Frank | Hengyu Luo | Flavio Giobergia | Vincent Segonne | Lorenzo Vaiani | Jörg Tiedemann | Timothee Mickus
The Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Uncertainty-Aware NLP
In 2026, we held the fourth iteration of the SHROOM Shared Task series: SHROOM-Visions (Shared-task on Hallucinations and Related Observable Overgeneration Mistakes in Vision language models), which is hosted at the UncertaiNLP Workshop co-located with EMNLP 2026. Following the success of the 2024 and 2025 tasks, this time we aim to tackle hallucinations through a model-agnostic detection task focused on large vision-language models. Building on the recently introduced SHEEP dataset, designed for long-term evaluation across model generations, the task invites participants to detect and classify fine-grained hallucination spans in image-conditioned text generation (VQA, image captioning, etc.). The evaluation uses a five-class taxonomy of hallucinations spanning four languages: Chinese, English, French, and Italian. The shared task generated strong interest in the NLP community worldwide, with 27 teams contributing 600+ system submissions. The best systems achieve average scores of 0.58 in character-level correlation, 0.46 in label-conditioned correlation, and 0.51 in intersection-over-union (IoU) across four languages, outperforming the baselines by 30–40 points.
Can Humans Dream of Electric Sheep? Human-Written Samples for Fine-Grained Vision-and-Language Hallucination Benchmarking
Timothee Mickus | Claudio Savelli | Eduardo Calò | Emilio Raimond | Stella Frank | Hengyu Luo | Flavio Giobergia | Vincent Segonne | Chuyuan Li | Aman Sinha | Lorenzo Vaiani | Jörg Tiedemann | Raúl Vázquez
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Timothee Mickus | Claudio Savelli | Eduardo Calò | Emilio Raimond | Stella Frank | Hengyu Luo | Flavio Giobergia | Vincent Segonne | Chuyuan Li | Aman Sinha | Lorenzo Vaiani | Jörg Tiedemann | Raúl Vázquez
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
In an age of rapid model turnover, how do we make hallucination evaluation more perennial? We explore whether human-written hallucination samples could take the place of model-generated hallucinations, in order to make benchmarking detection independent of particular models. To this end, we construct SHEEP, a dataset of 1,600 human-written samples, spanning four languages (Chinese, English, French, Italian), and 18,400 samples from five vision-and-language models, all annotated for hallucinations using a fine-grained span-level labeling scheme. We find that human-written samples result in higher agreement and allow greater control of dataset contents, while remaining distributionally similar to samples derived from vision-and-language samples and providing a reasonable portrayal of detection capabilities — suggesting that human data is a viable substitute for model-based hallucination benchmarks.