Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has advanced rapidly in recent years, driven by large-scale pretrained models and end-to-end architectures such as SLAM-ASR. A key component of SLAM-ASR systems is the Whisper speech encoder, which provides robust acoustic representations. While model pruning has been explored for the full Whisper encoder–decoder architecture, its impact within the SLAM-ASR setting remains under-investigated. In this work, we analyze the effects of layer pruning in the Whisper encoder when used as the acoustic backbone of SLAM-ASR. We further examine the extent to which LoRA-based fine-tuning can recover performance degradation caused by pruning. Experiments conducted across three Whisper variants (Small, Medium, Large-v2), three languages representing distinct resource levels (Danish, Dutch, English), and over 200 training runs demonstrate that pruning two encoder layers causes only 2–4% WER degradation, and that combining this pruning with LoRA adaptation consistently outperforms the unpruned baseline while reducing total parameters by 7–14%. Moreover, our error analysis reveals that LoRA primarily compensates through the language model’s linguistic priors, reducing total word errors by 18.2%, with substitution errors showing the largest reduction. However, for low-resource Danish, LoRA introduces increased insertion errors, indicating that compensation effectiveness depends on the LLM’s pre-existing language proficiency and available training data.

Speech-LLMs are expensive to run, making compression important for real-world deployment. However, compressed models are usually selected using aggregate word error rate (WER), which can hide how pruning affects different demographic groups. In this work, we systematically study the effect of audio encoder pruning on SLAM-ASR for different demographic groups. Using the Fair-Speech and Common Voice datasets, we found that the pruning does not affect all demographic groups equally; the gap between best- and worstperforming groups increases in fold. These disparities appear across all three encoder scales, but only the largest model initially hides them behind aggregate WER. LoRA adaptation improves WER for every group, but benefits groups already performing well more strongly and widens for certain groups. On Common Voice English, Danish, and Dutch, accent gaps persist but do not clearly widen, showing that the fairness effects of pruning vary across datasets and must be measured directly. Our findings suggest that for pruned models, deployment decisions should include per-group WER, with the worst-performing group’s error rate as an explicit criterion.