Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), trained by aligning visual encoders to LLMs on extensive vision-language data, demonstrate impressive performance across a broad variety of tasks that require understanding of both visual and textual inputs. Acknowledging this, recent work proposed to post-hoc convert generative LVLMs into vision-language encoders (VLEs) via supervised contrastive learning objectives. This type of training enables LVLMs to produce better representations, i.e., embeddings for image and text input, used in retrieval and (semantic) similarity tasks. Having observed that this type of VLEs (i.e., LVLMs turned into encoders) commonly employ last-token pooling in downstream tasks, without using special sequence-end tokens, in this focused contribution, we study the effect of pooling strategies on VLEs’ downstream performance. We empirically show that, in contrast to mean pooling, last-token pooling (without special sequence-end tokens) makes VLEs highly sensitive to end-of-input artifacts in fine-tuning and inference data, e.g., whether input sequences end with punctuation or newline characters. Finally, we show that introducing the special end-of-sequence token removes this sensitivity and makes VLEs robust to formatting artifacts of input text.