The WMT26 General MT task evaluates systems on 10 language pairs that have no human references (neither translated from scratch nor post-edited from MT output by humans). We describe how we built the pseudo-references for these pairs and six other language pairs (in which some forms of human references are available): seven models translate the 3,277 official documents under up to five prompt conditions, giving a total of 26 system–prompt combinations; then three reference-free quality estimation (QE) models score every candidate; and a per-document selector picks one translation, which GPT-5.5 post-edits where needed. Working without references exposed a failure mode of QE-guided selection: the metrics rank fluent output in the wrong language above correct translations. Adding a confidence-scaled language identification penalty to the score fusion drives the wrong-language count to zero, and the resulting selector still scores better on MetricX than the rank-fusion baseline it replaces. Since no references were available for these pairs while we were building them, we calibrate every selection decision on last year’s WMT25 human judgments. The human evaluation, released after construction, shows the cost of getting selection wrong: our references stand with the strongest participating systems when the selector kept a frontier-model candidate, and fall up to 17 ESA points below them when it did not. We release the selection method and the provenance of every reference.

We present the findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems, continuing last year’s unification of the earlier separate WMT Metrics and Quality Estimation shared tasks. This year we evaluated three complementary views of segment-level translation quality on a common test set: fine-grained error-span detection, continuous quality-score prediction, and a new task on identifying error-free translations. Submissions to upstream tasks were also converted automatically to downstream predictions. The evaluation covered 21 translation directions using human cESA judgments from the WMT26 General Machine Translation task, with optional reference translations generated as either native, post-edited, or pseudo-references, depending on the translation direction. Official evaluation data was complemented by five submitted challenge sets. Across all three primary tasks, unsupervised LLM-as-a-judge approaches outperformed all traditional and supervised metrics, while open-weight models such as Gemma 4 were found to be largely competitive with proprietary frontier models. Reference-free LLM judges are highly competitive, and the benefit of adding a reference largely depends on its provenance and on the evaluator model family.

The WMT25 Shared Task on Automated Translation Evaluation Systems evaluates metrics and quality estimation systems that assess the quality of language translation systems. This task unifies and consolidates the separate WMT shared tasks on Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics and Quality Estimation from previous years. Our primary goal is to encourage the development and assessment of new state-of-the-art translation quality evaluation systems. The shared task this year consisted of three subtasks: (1) segment-level quality score prediction, (2) span-level translation error annotation, and (3) quality-informed segment-level error correction. The evaluation data for the shared task were provided by the General MT shared task and were complemented by “challenge sets” from both the organizers and participants. Task 1 results indicate the strong performance of large LLMs at the system level, whilereference-based baseline metrics outperform LLMs at the segment level. Task 2 results indicate that accurate error detection and balancing precision and recall are persistent challenges. Task 3 results show that minimal editing is challenging even when informed by quality indicators. Robustness across the broad diversity of languages remains a major challenge across all three subtasks.

Machine translation is used in e-commerce to translate second-language queries into the primary language of the store, to be matched by the search system against the product catalog. However, many queries contain spelling mistakes. We first present an analysis of the spelling-robustness of a population of MT systems, quantifying how spelling variations affect MT output, the list of returned products, and ultimately user behavior. We then present two sets of practical experiments illustrating how spelling-robustness may be specifically improved. For MT, reducing the number of BPE operations significantly improves spelling-robustness in six language pairs. In end-to-end e-commerce, the inclusion of a dedicated spelling correction model, and the augmentation of that model’s training data with language-relevant phenomena, each improve robustness and consistency of search results.

The ability of machine translation (MT) models to correctly place markup is crucial to generating high-quality translations of formatted input. This paper compares two commonly used methods of representing markup tags and tests the ability of MT models to learn tag placement via training data augmentation. We study the interactions of tag representation, data augmentation size, tag complexity, and language pair to show the drawbacks and benefits of each method. We construct and release new test sets containing tagged data for three language pairs of varying difficulty.